:bump:
i think it's important to keep this thread visible, since these claims are all fairly recent.
i think it's important to keep this thread visible, since these claims are all fairly recent.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
No, I have to disagree here.
As a seller, you can be persuasive, of course and it is entirely up to you how you price the item; but you still have a legal obligation to ensure that anything you say/write is FACTUAL.
So, if you claim, to use your example, that an item is being sold at your cost, that must be the case.
Otherwise, it's fraud, pure and simple.
OK, so you may well think that any buyer, with any sense/experience, would know they were being 'sold'; as who on earth would sell anything professionally for no profit? But whether that is the case, or not, is completely irrelevant.
Whether a buyer is naive, or not, makes no difference in the eyes of the law, if a seller has been dishonest.
Although I agree it is always wise to do one's due diligence, as a buyer, it is not the legal responsibility of any buyer to do so.
So, no, according to the law, the buyer does not bear the burden if they do not have things 'checked' before finalising the transaction.![]()
Whoa! I bought a pair of pearl earrings from Elena and almost bought a pricey pearl and diamond pair of earrings, but got something from Tiffany's instead. After reading this thread I'm glad that I didn't. I have no idea if the pearl earrings I got were as advertised or not, I do wear them and they look nice, but who knows. The backs didn't fit that well IMO, so that is one thing I was disappointed by and sort of kept me from spending more.
well guys.. i was wearing this diamond hoops that I got from E and went to my local jeweller and he said they were beautifully made great quality etc. he didnt give me appraisal but looked it over with an eye piece and said they were beautiful.. not sure what that means but it made me feel better
No, I have to disagree here.
As a seller, you can be persuasive, of course and it is entirely up to you how you price the item; but you still have a legal obligation to ensure that anything you say/write is FACTUAL.
So, if you claim, to use your example, that an item is being sold at your cost, that must be the case.
Otherwise, it's fraud, pure and simple.
OK, so you may well think that any buyer, with any sense/experience, would know they were being 'sold'; as who on earth would sell anything professionally for no profit? But whether that is the case, or not, is completely irrelevant.
Whether a buyer is naive, or not, makes no difference in the eyes of the law, if a seller has been dishonest.
Although I agree it is always wise to do one's due diligence, as a buyer, it is not the legal responsibility of any buyer to do so.
So, no, according to the law, the buyer does not bear the burden if they do not have things 'checked' before finalising the transaction.![]()