I meant my scarves are 90 cm, not that I have 90 of them. Just to be clear that I speak only of my 90 cm![]()
Indian Dust was ink jet printed - not screen printed - so a finer mist of color that does not soak through to the other side as for screen printing
Honestly yes on some of my authentic vintage ones I have noticed that. The process has changed over the years but even my Indian Dust scarf from 2008 was much more vivid on one side than the other.
I am curious to hear the answer to this, I recently picked up a vintage scarf and it is not as bright on the flip side as my newer 90s. Sorry I can't help...ETA or maybe that does? It was from the Finds thread so I am almost positive it is authentic, seller has all authentic ratingsI can take pics to compare if you would like, the difference is subtle but noticeable, this scarf is also lighter in color than my others.
I am afraid I just made it more confusing again...hopefully someone with authority will chime in.
Thank you ladies. This is making me feel better as I thought that all scarves were screen printed. Does anyone know if Lumieres do Paris was ink jet printed?