I don't think they ever cared. They just pretended to.
Uh, that's what I thought. That they don't care because shill bidding means higher price = higher final value fee, right? No wonder the seller is so confident in doing so.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I don't think they ever cared. They just pretended to.
Follow up with my original post. Just got a random message from the seller, delilahjonz, from ebay:So I just bought a 23 piece rehab lot of coach bags. I get an message from the seller about one of the bags and says she is switching it out with another bag because the "inside seam is gross". The seller doesnt even wait for me to see if I'm okay with this and has already shipped the lot. How is this allowed? They are rehab bags so I didn't expect them to be in pristine condition but the one she was switching out was a style I was interested in. The one in its place is nice but I'm still a bit mad they didn't consult with me first as I paid for the other one.
She seems to be missing the point. She didn't ask you before switching the bags. The buyer is entitled to receive exactly what was shown in the listing, unless any changes are approved in advance. What she did was dishonest, unfair, and deserving of negative feedback, IMO. I'd be willing to bet she sold the Chester bag separately.Follow up with my original post. Just got a random message from the seller, delilahjonz, from ebay:
New message from: delilahjonz (230)
I switched the item out for the benefit of you, gave you a nicer bag instead of one with gross stuff down in the seams. I can’t believe you would give me a negative feedback for that. That’s rude.
I do not recommend this seller, she is not honest.
It actually looks like a SNAD chargeback, no reason for SNAD given, so how does she respond so she's not out the bag and $since PayPal protection is null for snad?My mom bought a bag off eBay, it was too big for her so she had me resell it. Here's my listing. It was back in december.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/391953596002?ssPageName=STRK:MESOX:IT
I did not include a picture of the little white tag inside the pocket because the pocket doesn't turn inside out andit was impossible to get the camera down there to capture the number.
Today she received an email from PayPal that the buyer has opened a dispute, doesn't believe the item is authentic, dispute was not opened in eBay ever.
What are my mom's next steps considering this bag was delivered over a month ago? Should she contact the original seller or open a dispute against the original seller?
It's trickier because she opened a credit card dispute, not a ebay or paypal dispute. You are at the mercy of her credit card company, and they don't ask to hear your side. I would call paypal. Ask them what information they require from you to respond to the claim and how you can be sure to get your bag back if she wins the dispute.It actually looks like a SNAD chargeback, no reason for SNAD given, so how does she respond so she's not out the bag and $since PayPal protection is null for snad?
Thank you. She called and payPay said they would see if they can get some more information. They also reversed the hold and said if the cc company decides for buyer and they have to reverse the hold again, the buyer would be required to return the item (whether it's dirty damaged or whatever condition she left it in), but I'm not sure that's true. I've seen plenty of people on here losing their item and $...It's trickier because she opened a credit card dispute, not a ebay or paypal dispute. You are at the mercy of her credit card company, and they don't ask to hear your side. I would call paypal. Ask them what information they require from you to respond to the claim and how you can be sure to get your bag back if she wins the dispute.
My mom bought a bag off eBay, it was too big for her so she had me resell it. Here's my listing. It was back in december.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/391953596002?ssPageName=STRK:MESOX:IT
I did not include a picture of the little white tag inside the pocket because the pocket doesn't turn inside out andit was impossible to get the camera down there to capture the number.
Today she received an email from PayPal that the buyer has opened a dispute, doesn't believe the item is authentic, dispute was not opened in eBay ever.
What are my mom's next steps considering this bag was delivered over a month ago? Should she contact the original seller or open a dispute against the original seller?
It actually looks like a SNAD chargeback, no reason for SNAD given, so how does she respond so she's not out the bag and $since PayPal protection is null for snad?
It's trickier because she opened a credit card dispute, not a ebay or paypal dispute. You are at the mercy of her credit card company, and they don't ask to hear your side. I would call paypal. Ask them what information they require from you to respond to the claim and how you can be sure to get your bag back if she wins the dispute.
Several comments:Thank you. She called and payPay said they would see if they can get some more information. They also reversed the hold and said if the cc company decides for buyer and they have to reverse the hold again, the buyer would be required to return the item (whether it's dirty damaged or whatever condition she left it in), but I'm not sure that's true. I've seen plenty of people on here losing their item and $...
Paypal charges a chargeback fee?Several comments:
1. It's really too bad when buyers don't approach the seller before opening disputes because you lose the opportunity to appease or explain any doubts they may have.
2. You can't ask her why she thinks it's fake.
3. Since you can't contact her bank/c.c. company nor does PP identify them, you can't submit anything.
4. It's really important to show (or attempt to show) pictures of any parts of the bag that may be necessary in order to prove authenticity. Even if the buyer had approached us on AT Coach, we couldn't have done much with what is shown in the listing.
5. I think PP's reply to you about fighting on your behalf is lip service. Unfortunately, there's no seller protection against SNAD claims with PP and particularly in cases of chargebacks
6. If the c.c. company decides in their client's favor, the likelihood of requiring her to return the bag is slim. Usually, c.c. disputes are resolved in favor of their client, refund is issued, paypal is notified that you lost the dispute and it ends there. The opportunity for PP to require the return isn't there.
7. Had the buyer filed through PP (which she could have done for 180 days), THEN you could have just offered the refund upon return.
I'm guessing that she filed as she did because she was aware that ebay only allows a 30-timeframe for disputes and probably assumed PP was the same.
At this point, I believe you have nothing to lose by contacting her, referring her here (or to ebay's fashion board) for authentication and reassurance and requesting the return of the bag, after which you'll issue the refund. And she could end/close the chargeback.
That way, you'll avoid Paypal's surcharge of a chargeback fee on top of the loss of your money and the bag.
I think it's $20 if it's decided against the seller.Paypal charges a chargeback fee?
Thank you for a thorough replySeveral comments:
1. It's really too bad when buyers don't approach the seller before opening disputes because you lose the opportunity to appease or explain any doubts they may have.
2. You can't ask her why she thinks it's fake.
3. Since you can't contact her bank/c.c. company nor does PP identify them, you can't submit anything.
4. It's really important to show (or attempt to show) pictures of any parts of the bag that may be necessary in order to prove authenticity. Even if the buyer had approached us on AT Coach, we couldn't have done much with what is shown in the listing.
5. I think PP's reply to you about fighting on your behalf is lip service. Unfortunately, there's no seller protection against SNAD claims with PP and particularly in cases of chargebacks
6. If the c.c. company decides in their client's favor, the likelihood of requiring her to return the bag is slim. Usually, c.c. disputes are resolved in favor of their client, refund is issued, paypal is notified that you lost the dispute and it ends there. The opportunity for PP to require the return isn't there.
7. Had the buyer filed through PP (which she could have done for 180 days), THEN you could have just offered the refund upon return.
I'm guessing that she filed as she did because she was aware that ebay only allows a 30-timeframe for disputes and probably assumed PP was the same.
At this point, I believe you have nothing to lose by contacting her, referring her here (or to ebay's fashion board) for authentication and reassurance and requesting the return of the bag, after which you'll issue the refund. And she could end/close the chargeback.
That way, you'll avoid Paypal's surcharge of a chargeback fee on top of the loss of your money and the bag.
That's weird. I wonder if she used a credit card that belongs to someone else, and they didn't realize she did.Thank you for a thorough replyI actually did message the buyer, a very polite message asking what was wrong with the bag, etc. She replied back that she too was confused and that she didn't open a dispute, she loves the bag and she'll call PayPal to see what is going on. I haven't heard back from her yet, but at least I have that message saying all that to add to the dispute. Fingers crossed on this one.
Thank you for a thorough replyI actually did message the buyer, a very polite message asking what was wrong with the bag, etc. She replied back that she too was confused and that she didn't open a dispute, she loves the bag and she'll call PayPal to see what is going on. I haven't heard back from her yet, but at least I have that message saying all that to add to the dispute. Fingers crossed on this one.
Or if she disputed another unauthorized charge and the c.c. company flagged all her recent purchases.That's weird. I wonder if she used a credit card that belongs to someone else, and they didn't realize she did.