answers to AUTHENTICITY questions!!!

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I saw a small patchwork bag while I was out this morning. The serial number started with M3U, so I left it quick, thinking those were always fake. I did snap a bad picture of the full number to check against my list at home. M3U-10729. Now that I'm reading over the Fake Serial Number guide, I see that there were some genuine bags with this number from 2003. When were the patchwork lines produced? This bag was dark shades, with chocolate brown and burgundy. I'll appreciate any comments!

Coach didn't start using 5-number style numbers starting with 10*** until very late in 2005 to be sold as 2006 styles, so all M3U- prefixes in bags with any 10*** or higher 5-number style number, OR accessories with any 40*** or higher 5-number style number, are fake, no exceptions.
 
Last edited:
Coach didn't start using 5-number style numbers starting with 10*** until very late in 2005 to be sold as 2006 styles, so all M3U- prefixes in bags with any 10*** or higher 5-number style number, OR accessories with any 40*** or higher 5-number style number, are fake, no exceptions.

Thank you Hyacinth. That helps a lot. I like the definite, no exceptions. Makes it easier for a newbie like myself. :smile1:
 
FAKE SERIAL NUMBER PREFIX H5G-

Here's another one that's been turning up a lot in the last few months. It's found in both real and fake bags and ANY bag with this prefix needs to be authenticated, especially since the fakes have been outnumbering the genuine ones recently.

The genuine ones have a very specific and noticeable font and stamping and will all be classic leathers. The fakes have been turning up not just in copies of leather styles from 1995 but also in fake Signature styles and other styles that weren't even made until long after that year.

Even though some people might question the first one pictured below because of the uneveness of the letters and numbers, this is actually one of the REAL ones. The second one is probably fake, but there have been as many different fonts and stamping styles of the fake creeds and numbers so far as there have been of the fakes themselves. Please let the experts decide.
 

Attachments

  • 1995_G-plant_4115_outlet.jpg
    1995_G-plant_4115_outlet.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 217
  • 1995_G-plant-prob-FAKE-US-H5G-9950.jpg
    1995_G-plant-prob-FAKE-US-H5G-9950.jpg
    137.4 KB · Views: 225
Hyacinth -

I've been studying both G and H codes for a while now...

Have you noticed that the creeds with the G plant codes still have the "old" wording into 1997?

I have examples in my files from FEB 1995 through MAY 1997, all with the old wording. I have nothing yet for JUNE, JULY, and AUG 1997, but SEPT 1997 and forward have the new wording.

Just curious...
 
Hyacinth -

I've been studying both G and H codes for a while now...

Have you noticed that the creeds with the G plant codes still have the "old" wording into 1997?

I have examples in my files from FEB 1995 through MAY 1997, all with the old wording. I have nothing yet for JUNE, JULY, and AUG 1997, but SEPT 1997 and forward have the new wording.

Just curious...

I haven't seen any for 1997, but I've only started collecting "G" examples over the last few months, and concentrating mostly on *5G- numbers. If you want to post a few here or maybe a link to a public album somewhere I'd be very interested to see them. I'll be searching Ebay this morning to see what turns up

The G plant always struck me as being temporary, at least to Coach's corporate thinking. Just the thrown-together look of the serial number stamp makes it seem like that plant ended up with every else's cast-offs. "H" had the same feel, they both give the impression of being part-time plants for much of their production history.

It sounds like you've been studying these for a long time. If you'd like to share any of the information you've put together, you'll have a very appreciative audience right here. :smile1:
 
I haven't seen any for 1997, but I've only started collecting "G" examples over the last few months, and concentrating mostly on *5G- numbers. If you want to post a few here or maybe a link to a public album somewhere I'd be very interested to see them. I'll be searching Ebay this morning to see what turns up

The G plant always struck me as being temporary, at least to Coach's corporate thinking. Just the thrown-together look of the serial number stamp makes it seem like that plant ended up with every else's cast-offs. "H" had the same feel, they both give the impression of being part-time plants for much of their production history.

It sounds like you've been studying these for a long time. If you'd like to share any of the information you've put together, you'll have a very appreciative audience right here. :smile1:

Since I collect this stuff for my own personal use (edification? Heck - I have no real idea WHY I collect it!) all of my files are in WP. This means they're not easy-to-share jpg files...
I gave it a shot, putting together a few examples and printing them out on paper to scan & post. I tried it in color, but that didn't go too well, so I reprinted in gray scale.

I'm going to post a couple of pages worth - I HOPE some of it is legible enough to at least see that the creed wording is the old style. Here goes...
 

Attachments

  • Coach G creeds 1.jpg
    Coach G creeds 1.jpg
    277.1 KB · Views: 221
  • Coach G creeds 2.jpg
    Coach G creeds 2.jpg
    259 KB · Views: 214
Since I collect this stuff for my own personal use (edification? Heck - I have no real idea WHY I collect it!) all of my files are in WP. This means they're not easy-to-share jpg files...
I gave it a shot, putting together a few examples and printing them out on paper to scan & post. I tried it in color, but that didn't go too well, so I reprinted in gray scale.

I'm going to post a couple of pages worth - I HOPE some of it is legible enough to at least see that the creed wording is the old style. Here goes...
Thank you! They all have the same spacing. Most of the fakes I've seen have the numbers squished together.
 
Since I collect this stuff for my own personal use (edification? Heck - I have no real idea WHY I collect it!) all of my files are in WP. This means they're not easy-to-share jpg files...
I gave it a shot, putting together a few examples and printing them out on paper to scan & post. I tried it in color, but that didn't go too well, so I reprinted in gray scale.

I'm going to post a couple of pages worth - I HOPE some of it is legible enough to at least see that the creed wording is the old style. Here goes...

Great information, thanks for your effort with the photos!

I also found one today on Ebay from July 1997 with the NEW creed and an outlet stamp, so with all those photos the G plant from the mid-90s is confirmed as long as the serial number font(s) and layout matches, and the change happened in or around July
 

Attachments

  • 1997_G-plant-G7G-9089_Asheville Zip.jpg
    1997_G-plant-G7G-9089_Asheville Zip.jpg
    91.5 KB · Views: 211
Great information, thanks for your effort with the photos!

I also found one today on Ebay from July 1997 with the NEW creed and an outlet stamp, so with all those photos the G plant from the mid-90s is confirmed as long as the serial number font(s) and layout matches, and the change happened in or around July


Super! Thanks, Hyacinth. Okay, then, so JUNE or JULY 1997 it is. If I figure out which, I'll let you know.
 
Opinions on this creed? Have you ever seen them mix up the digit order on an H factory creed?
Hmmmm... I would think it's possible (?)

I have photos of about 3 dozen "H" plant creed patches, and not a single one of them has a transposed month/year. That said, I don't have one for March, April, or May of 1995.

The rest of it looks right, compared to the others I do have.
 
Hmmmm... I would think it's possible (?)

I have photos of about 3 dozen "H" plant creed patches, and not a single one of them has a transposed month/year. That said, I don't have one for March, April, or May of 1995.

The rest of it looks right, compared to the others I do have.
Thanks, that's what I thought too.
 
Top