Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I kindly request that all members participating in the MM and Harry thread dial back the vile rhetoric.

I am not opposed to discussing public personas on TPF, including the constant torrent of news surrounding the couple from this thread. But I find it troubling when their looks are being nitpicked apart to a degree that is just not appropriate.

This thread has drawn criticism over the years, and I discussed it at great length with Megs and the mods. I am not looking to close it down, but the vitriol needs to be dialed back.

My personal feelings about hate threads aside, this ultra-negative vibe is something better suited for other forums, Reddit, or elsewhere. I am holding our community to higher standards.

Thanks for reading.
 
She didn't make it big. She got married. To a bloke who was born big.

Big difference.
Yeah but it was enough for Pharrell to see it as symbolic and meaningful.

For those who forget, this was what he said at the Lion King premiere (which was conveniently overheard to release to the press).

"Love is amazing. It's wonderful," he added.

"Don't ever take that for granted but what it means in today's climate. I just wanted to tell you it's so significant for so many of us. Seriously.

"We cheer you guys on," he said.

Markle replied: "Thank you, they don't make it easy."

 
I have questions.

Is "their marriage just keeps getting stronger" code for "the Stockholm syndrom is escalating"?

Does "more space" mean more than 16 toilets?

How many minutes a day does Ghoul the motherhood natural spend with the children sans nanny?

View attachment 5716501

"They'll definitely have a lot more space when they move to a larger mansion"

More space than their current obnoxious house? For 2 adults & 2 kids? In need of a bigger mansion?

are-you-serious.gif
Also, who refers to a house/home as a 'mansion'? :lol:
Pretentious much :rolleyes: That must have been written by either Todger or TW.
Most people don't need a mAnSiOn with 16 bathrooms to raise 2 (or more) kids. They are so out of touch with reality it's unbelievable.
lost-your-mind.gif
 
Yeah but it was enough for Pharrell to see it as symbolic and meaningful.

For those who forget, this was what he said at the Lion King premiere (which was conveniently overheard to release to the press).

"Love is amazing. It's wonderful," he added.

"Don't ever take that for granted but what it means in today's climate. I just wanted to tell you it's so significant for so many of us. Seriously.

"We cheer you guys on," he said.

Markle replied: "Thank you, they don't make it easy."


Oh that's right! M did it all for LOVE :lol: :roflmfao:
 
"stuffed sausage Duchess"
:lol::lol::lol:

rachel zane usa GIF by Suits
 
Sam may have a Daily Mail/DMoS deal to tell her story after the suit. Ditto her lawyer.

IMHO, this suit is being handled in an amateurish fashion by Sam's attorneys - ex, the list of 38 questions should have been limited to those relevant to the relations between Sam / Harkles, because as filed, the list is just going to be subject to appeal/motions by MM attorney.

A suit should be clean and to the point if you HOPE TO WIN, so Sam may lack the expensive counsel needed to outgun MM's lawyers
but, if the goal is to provide fodder for a book/interview, then the suit is firing on all cylinders

AND ... we shoulds not forget another possible goal - Sam just wants a bit of payback for how badly (allegedly) MM has treated her family
Lawyers ask “irrelevant” questions interspersed with relevant questions. It’s a maneuver. Sort of luck trickery to lead to open to other questions. The defense can say it’s irrelevant due to ambiguity and object. I don’t think Sam’s lawyers are dumb. They are actually doing it right. Those high priced lawyers of hers might be too “comfortable” but it’s fair play.
 
Who is doing their PR lately? Remember the exaggerated curtsy at the Queen‘s funeral? Newsweek is saying it was the most wonderful expression of deep respect. :shocked:


 
Lawyers ask “irrelevant” questions interspersed with relevant questions. It’s a maneuver. Sort of luck trickery to lead to open to other questions. The defense can say it’s irrelevant due to ambiguity and object. I don’t think Sam’s lawyers are dumb. They are actually doing it right. Those high priced lawyers of hers might be too “comfortable” but it’s fair play.
Good point, I was thinking from the point of view of a lawyer client, hoping to keep costs down by keeping the suit lean and mean, every line my lawyer has to read costs me money
 
Who is doing their PR lately? Remember the exaggerated curtsy at the Queen‘s funeral? Newsweek is saying it was the most wonderful expression of deep respect. :shocked:


Her funeral curtsy gave me the chills too, except for different reasons. I saw it as a hypocritical thing to do to a woman who tried to include her into the family, and give her patronages and a platform that she could do something with. I found her curtsy to more of an insult than an expression of respect. Her little exaggerated curtsy performance in the Netflix doc cemented this idea for me.
 
Top