I tread carefully in commenting on this thread, but as Shelock Holmes says, "How often have I said that when you have excluded the impossible whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
So we have a mystery. It's entertaining, engaging and succeeding in creating doubt in the reputations of authenticators, resellers, the vintage market and Hermes itself. Some posters cautiously suggest that the OP is a scammer, only to be denounced by what the motive would be, the rarity of the mou sellier, etc.
Suppose (and this is merely a mental exercise as I do not know the OP or the reseller, but have purchased both from H directly and vintage bags after authentication) the OP is the "super fake" counterfeiter?
My only support for this supposition is that the reseller, the authenticator and H are known to many in this forum and appear to have sterling reputations. (Although still possessed with the human foible of non-perfection). OP is the most unknown figure.
Here is some objective "evidence":
Photos posted by OP that were used for the authentication (see earlier in this thread):
Photo posted here:
https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/what-is-your-last-hermes-purchase.886190/page-1801#post-32322877
Are these pictures of the same bag? If so, where did the veining and worn area go? The bag in the last picture looks quite pristine, so why the need for the spa visit?