On a separate note I do know of someone who used to buy bags but then sometimes sell her older bags to fund new purchases. She normally sold the bags on eBay. She sold bags very infrequently (maybe 3-4 bags in total over a few years) and she was 100% not a reseller and never sold the bags trying to make a profit. She didn't even purchase frequently, perhaps 2 bags each year. She received a text from her SA saying that it had come to their attention that she had been reselling bags and that they would no longer sell to her and she was essentially blacklisted. She was devastated about it and couldn't understand how they had come to that conclusion. Looking back I don't really understand how they would have found out unless they looked on eBay so perhaps these brands do have people employed to investigate eBay and other resale sites.
I 100% believe that Hermes and other brands should clamp down on people buying bags and selling them brand new straight after purchase for a profit. I don't think their should be a problem with selling used or new items a few years down the line when we have fallen out out love with them.
Can you tell us approx when this happened and in what country/city this happened? Curious if this is a new policy or the policy in a certain region.
I understand identifying people who are flipping BN bags at a high premium. But I don't understand the notion mentioned above about evaluating including commission in a resale price -- if you are selling yourself as the banned people ostensibly were, what commission are they paying? Sounds kind of rather an extensive evaluation to me.
I agree with 880 -- I think your SA generally knows whether you are buying for your own use (or family etc) as opposed to buying to flip. This whole notion of H forbidding people from selling things that no longer work for them, or some other personal circumstance sounds off to me.
Do other luxury retailers do this? Can you sell your Rolex without worrying about being blacklisted?