I'm not comfortable with the seller at all.
How do you (or Bababebi) know that the pictures she sent for authentication purposes are of the actual item?
As shown, at least some of the pictures in the Hermes listing were stolen from other sources and additionally, other listings from the same seller use pictures stolen from other sources.
For example, 2synch has this Celine listing:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/3100-Celine...633377?hash=item1eb058dfe1:g:I2AAAOSwe7BWxNzj
The first picture was stolen from this post here on TPF:
http://forum.purseblog.com/celine-r...e-reference-thread-741209-4.html#post24937423
I haven't gone through all the listings but in looking at the list of listings, many are stock or other sourced pictures.
Sellers are not supposed to infringe on the intellectual property of others by using pictures that they don't own.
and at this price point, buyers should be seeing her own pictures of the actual items she sells.
As for paypal fees, that's about 3% and yes, she'll be paying those, but it's the big money that she's screwing ebay out of.
I stand by my opinion that an honest seller won't rip off the site that gave them exposure.
Use the site; pay the fees.
Will it help me as a buyer if I just ask for the item to be relisted? Or should I just totally walk away? [emoji16]