@bagsaremyjam , I didn’t read any animus directed to you in the subsequent croc clarification. I did get some valuable info from it. Even assuming bad intent, it’s more constructive to the thread continuation to ignore rather than respond like above.
I reread your original post several times, and i incorrectly assumed real crocodile and some autocorrect issue. I was going to google the year when chanel ceased using exotics. (I thought perhaps your Gabrielle dated from that year. It never occurred to me that chanel would use croc embossed leather bc my SA laughed when I said I wanted a stingray bag, and she joked textile is now Chanel’s exotic.
when I googled cocodile, I got many references to croc Gabrielle that was made with cocodile croc embossed leather. ( google didn’t pull up any direct chanel copy for the bag) so to the casual reader, chanel is described as calling its embossed leather cocodile ,not the bag. Regardless, Chanel is being more disingenuous than tongue in cheek here. JMO. I clearly won’t stop buying the brand.
here are two pieces dated 03A that are fabric croc embossed, and more tongue in cheek than disingenuous. No true ambiguity except a faux effect bc the material is not leather. As I typed this, I wish that chanel had chosen a toile, canvas or hard wearing fabric of some kind for the 19 tote or the 22 rather than a problematic leather. The price could have remained the same, as evidenced by past bags. Or even the dior tapestry.
View attachment 5581479