Hyacinth's tPF Fakes List - combined UPDATES from March 2014
these are additions to the posts here:
posts 1077-1080
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-72.html#post26447774
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-72.html#post26447783
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-72.html#post26447792
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-72.html#post26447822
Check the dates here at the Answers thread or the posted link for more information
J8H-9929
IS SHOWING UP IN NUMEROUS FAKES
three fakes, all different styles, were found by an Ebay poster with J8H-9929 serial numbers. The -9929 style number also turned up in a totally fake bag with a prefix H4B which is already on the List as being one that should be checked when it's used in a handbag instead of an item from the Business or Travel lines. Although the List says that H4B- prefixes with style numbers starting with 99** or 98** are usually genuine, there are exceptions (3-27-14)
M3V-4916
A few bags have turned up with the above number, which is ALWAYS fake and never would have been used in a genuine
Coach. It's been found in several different styles but at least two of the fakes were trying to be Berkeley Drawstrings, which are a version of the Lula's Legacy Drawstring but made of a mix of suede (the reverse side of Coach's glove-tanned leather) and a pebbled leather in the same color. But the style number, creed description, plant and year codes are ALL wrong. (4-11-2014)
L4K- and ALL OTHER *4K- serial numbers - often or always fake
J4K- serial prefixes are already on the Fake Numbers List but we need to add all other *4K- serials as probable or usually fakes. That K plant code seems to be invalid for 1994. There may be a few valid L4K- numbers but they all should be authenticated. (4-12-14)
Also,
any serial prefixes from the mid to late 1990s where the "o" in the "No" in front of the serial number is more than half the height of the "N" needs to be carefully authenticated, like the one below.
D2J-6068
is always fake, no exceptions. Coach never seems to have used style number 6068 in a purse.
L04M-1894
showing up on a number of fakes in a variety of different styles. Style 1894 should be a hamptons tote. (6-14-2014)
C5C-2358
This always-fake number has been found on several "Court Bags" and is fake no matter what style it's in since -2358 is NOT a valid handbag style number, and definitely is NOT the right code for a Court Bag. The serial numbers will probably have an unusually thick font, and the creed font also will not be the one used during 1995 by the C plant (7-19-14)
-1814M.
That style is showing on various patterns of soho flap bags, some with optic signature patterns and some with regular signature patterns. Prefixes (I've been seeing) have 2002 and 2003 year codes. The REAL style 1814 belongs ONLY to a Kiwi Green Scribble Flower Purse Charm from around Spring 2006 (8-11-14)
B0973-12988
found in more fakes than genuine bags. The real style 12988 is an Op Art Crossbody Bag shown here:
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-81.html#post27327621
4437-576
has been found in many seemingly vintage bags, pictures of a few are here: (10-13-2014)
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-82.html#post27528280
M3U-
this prefix shows up in at least as many fakes as in genuine Coaches. It should ALWAYS be looked at by one of our experts (2-8-2015)
Pictures of some fakes are here:
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-84.html#post28049691
-7765
-7469
these style numbers are often found in fakes, see this post on Feb 9, 2015 for more details and pics:
http://forum.purseblog.com/coach-sh...enticity-questions-94198-84.html#post28052785