it was for a $1599 OBO bag, buyer NEVER even negotiate price, just saids she WANTS that bag in her collection
OK.. WHY? And absolutely not arguing w/ you or picking on you, pot_luck. Just wondering as to your reasoning.
IF the BUYER makes an agreement, and then the BUYER chooses not to honor their agreement, WHY are they entitled to anything? The buyer INITIATED this transaction. The buyer chose not to honor the transaction. IMO, the buyer should pay the consequence for that, not the seller.
WHAT IF.... while the seller was waiting for the buyer to pay, seller got a better offer. So seller refunds buyer the deposit and says... "oops, sorry, got a better offer". Buyer might well be pissed if the SELLER had not honored HER agreement.... So why is it OK for the buyer NOT to fulfill her end of the bargain??
I just do not see a difference. When 2 parties make an agreement, they BOTH should be accountable, IMO. And one should not take precedence over the other. He who defaults pays the consequence. That's real life.
Further thoughts, anyone??
Dyyong.. how much was this bag??????????