I would have told her to F* off.
I've used my bags every time I've gone out and no one's said anything. Granted I'm in a rural area most of the time these days, but I was in the city (Manhattan) Monday all day and no one even looked twice.
THIS.. Only I would have probably done worse.
I don't own anything branded or even anything newer than 2013 and that's long before the current monsters were relevant.
Judging people and having the self-righteous, holier than thou ego to confront them for carrying a 10-20 year old bag is beyond insanity.
There isn't a person out there whose home is free of all things that have had controversy or could be deemed questionable.
The items I own were made & sold LONG before this current group of people were associated with Bal. If people go down this path of retroactive outrage & condemnation, where does it end? If this happened to Gucci or Louboutin I wouldn't judge people for wearing items they had collected through the years. That's asinine.
I wouldn't buy from Bal now, wouldn't even go near their items. That's how a boycott works. This new iteration, created by the Internet & social media, of retroactive cancelling is pointless. I doesn't hurt Bal or any other company.
Boycott away.. I plan to but come correct.. Don't give Bal any of your money. Blaming others that are also outraged accomplishes nothing. People that owned Bal before this demon errrr,,, Demna,,, was part of it are not to blame and they do NOT deserve outrage or condemnation. There is no crystal ball to gaze into to predict how far a brand will fall in 10-20 years, what abyss they will dive into to. Punish the current monsters, I hope they go bankrupt but don't punish innocent people that are completely divorced from the current Bal brand.