TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
i don't think i'd be thinking clearly at this point either. this is horrible!Ahhhhh OK! Sorry! You are all correct! Sorry, I am obviously not thinking logically here. Definitely! At the end of the day it is an $11K actual loss for me.
Thank you all for clearing me up!
I'm so sorry! This is awful. You should speak to an attorney about going after Pay Pal - because you had documentation it was authentic, they should have AT THE LEAST demanded the return of the item. Since they are the ones that decided you weren't going to get it returned, they need to pay for it.
I would contact Pay Pal on Monday one last time and ask for an ambassador. It's a new program that they have started since the sellers are being ripped off and scammed so much - they now have ambassadors that have the authority to make immediate decisions on appeals or handle special problems that sellers are having.
Does this buyer have an eBay ID? I know we'd all appreciate having it so we can block this scammer.
Also if you can provide information about the buyer and where they are located you might be amazed at what the tpf detectives can turn up with. Want to bet this purse winds up being sold by the scammer?
Also you can also try to file with Canadian law enforcement - this is theft of over $10,000. At a minimum they may be able to contact the buyer to find out where the purse is now.
Ah..... This makes sense then because then the pics, auction and FB WOULD have been relevant.
is it a silly question to ask whether you can sue paypal or not?
i understand its the buyer that said its SNAD, and that it is 'fake' but it is paypal that told her to destroy your property and took the 11k from you.
Ahhhhh OK! Sorry! You are all correct! Sorry, I am obviously not thinking logically here. Definitely! At the end of the day it is an $11K actual loss for me.
Thank you all for clearing me up!
I cannot appeal it.......PP told me it is not an option because the bag has been "destroyed" by the buyer........right.
As I say, they might still have found in the buyer's favour, as it might have just been assumed that the item was a bait and switch, on the seller's behalf; but if you had appealed it, then I'm pretty sure they would have looked into it in greater detail?
Might still not have done any good, I know, but at least I think you would have stood more of a chance of a fairer hearing?
You may have some recourse against PP for instructing the scammer to destroy your bag. I don't know where they have the legal authority to destroy someone's property whether or not it is authentic. They have never seen the bag and have no way of knowing whether it is authentic. They don't know whether scammer had your bag "authenticated" or some bad fake authenticated (bait and switch). They also don't know if the "authenticator" has the first clue about how to go about authenticating H bags. What they have essentially done is order someone to destroy your property - whether it is worth $250 or $9000. I would mention this angle to the attorneys you are speaking with on Monday and see if they can make something out of that. If you go against PP, you can do so in Small Claims Court here in Calif. Attorneys are not allowed but you can have help pulling your case and your evidence together. I think it is a pretty easy process and you may get at least some satisfaction that way. I am so sorry about this mess, OP!