I think the most this will cause to happen is that PP will just make sure that merchandise is returned to the seller rather than destroyed by the buyer. And when I say merchandise, I mean whatever the buyer has lying around the house to send back as PP will only consider the tracking information as evidence of return.
Because at the end of the day, PP still has much more to lose through chargebacks and it is because of these chargebacks that PP finds in favor of the buyer.
I wonder if their investigation is really a matter of finding out if the item was paid via credit card or bank transfer. And if it was paid via bank transfer, then they are more apt to actually review the evidence since they don't fear a chargeback?
Because at the end of the day, PP still has much more to lose through chargebacks and it is because of these chargebacks that PP finds in favor of the buyer.
I wonder if their investigation is really a matter of finding out if the item was paid via credit card or bank transfer. And if it was paid via bank transfer, then they are more apt to actually review the evidence since they don't fear a chargeback?