Vintage Coach Photos & Chat

[Catbird9]

Hehehe no I haven't. here they are. My Thompson bucket bags.
View attachment 4670647 View attachment 4670648

You don't happen to need a matching eyeglass case, do you?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vtg-Coach-Leather-Eyeglass-Case/254520503840

(not my listing; not authenticated but I don't see any red flags.)

 

[houseof999]

Wow! What’s the tote bag on the second shelf?

It's style 4172. Can't recall the name. I thought I saved the catalog pic but I'm not finding it right now.

 

[houseof999]

You don't happen to need a matching eyeglass case, do you?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vtg-Coach-Leather-Eyeglass-Case/254520503840

(not my listing; not authenticated but I don't see any red flags.)

Lol do I? I don't wear eyeglasses but it could make a nice case for sunglasses! Thank you!

 

[Catbird9]

Lol do I? I don't wear eyeglasses but it could make a nice case for sunglasses! Thank you!

Yes, I have one in British tan and I use it for sunglasses. Love it.

 

[Lake Effect]

It's overcast today so it's hard to capture the differences.. here's another pic I took before I put them all in the bookshelf.
View attachment 4680419

Jelly! Completely jelly

 

[whateve]

You don't happen to need a matching eyeglass case, do you?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vtg-Coach-Leather-Eyeglass-Case/254520503840

(not my listing; not authenticated but I don't see any red flags.)

I love the yellow interior.

 

[Catbird9]

I love the yellow interior.

Me too! If I didn't already have one, I'd be making an offer on it.

 

[Tiggerhawk]

Can anyone tell me more about a couple of styles from 15 years ago? I’m trying to figure out dimensions based on the style number - all the listings online give the same range. I’m looking at 10131 and 10132 from 2006. I posted a couple of pics as well - marked them with what the listing is.

 

[Lake Effect]

Can anyone tell me more about a couple of styles from 15 years ago? I’m trying to figure out dimensions based on the style number - all the listings online give the same range. I’m looking at 10131 and 10132 from 2006. I posted a couple of pics as well - marked them with what the listing is.

Although you are not asking this, and I am sorry I do not know the dimensions, fyi the bags from this family have a bit of weight to them (in proportion to comparable sizes of other bags) between the pebbled leather and the hardware. I have handled them at thrift shops.

 

[Tiggerhawk]

Although you are not asking this, and I am sorry I do not know the dimensions, fyi the bags from this family have a bit of weight to them (in proportion to comparable sizes of other bags) between the pebbled leather and the hardware. I have handled them at thrift shops.

I’m okay with a good sturdy bag to be honest. I think my question maybe could have been worded “Should the 10132 be a bit larger since it’s style number is higher?” It seems to follow what I’m seeing on my stalking from other 2006 bags.

 

[whateve]

Can anyone tell me more about a couple of styles from 15 years ago? I’m trying to figure out dimensions based on the style number - all the listings online give the same range. I’m looking at 10131 and 10132 from 2006. I posted a couple of pics as well - marked them with what the listing is.

Although you are not asking this, and I am sorry I do not know the dimensions, fyi the bags from this family have a bit of weight to them (in proportion to comparable sizes of other bags) between the pebbled leather and the hardware. I have handled them at thrift shops.

I think the leather on these is marvelous. I've always loved the Chelsea line.

I don't have either of these styles in my files but I would bet 10132 is bigger.

 

[Lake Effect]

I think the leather on these is marvelous. I've always loved the Chelsea line.

I don't have either of these styles in my files but I would bet 10132 is bigger.

It is amazing leather to be sure. I saw one that had a bit of a boxy rectangle shape and I could not believe how heavy it was. Empty!

 

[whateve]

It is amazing leather to be sure. I saw one that had a bit of a boxy rectangle shape and I could not believe how heavy it was. Empty!

I used to have this one. It was absolutely gorgeous!

 

[Tiggerhawk]

I think the leather on these is marvelous. I've always loved the Chelsea line.

I don't have either of these styles in my files but I would bet 10132 is bigger.

thats what I am betting as well. The 10400 that I also want is bigger than the 10399 that I have, which also looks to be a bit larger than the 10398. I’m hoping their style number conventions are at least consistent within one manufacturing year!!

thanks everyone!

 

[Lake Effect]

I used to have this one. It was absolutely gorgeous!

Yummy. And it weighed a ton?? Rotator cuff special??