That's how I am too, no sushi![]()
Excellent....more for me! Mwahahahahahaha!!!

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
That's how I am too, no sushi![]()
And I agree with you about the "labeling" associated with being called a hypocrite. You're exactly right, it solves nothing. However, the only reason it is being discussed (to this extent) is because the OP specifically asked if it was hypocritical to wear leather as a vegetarian. It's not even something that I would sit around and discuss - and as I said before, I don't really care what someone chooses to eat or wear.
If we really want to get technical, I would consider a hypocrite to be someone who would tell others that eating meat is wrong and eat meat themselves.
There technically is no contradiction between thinking the killing of animals for food is wrong but to be ok with the killing of animals for other products and goods because you're opposed/supportive of those purposes for different reasons.
I don't like calling people hypocrites, because it just serves no purpose. Maybe it makes the person doing the finger-pointing and name-calling feel better about themselves, but it doesn't do anything other than create hostility.
This has been discussed a million times before, but no one can really truly avoid animal products 100%. They're found in everything, everywhere.
Would you call someone who drives a Prius a hypocrite? I'm sure they're still using electricity and power and putting off carbon somewhere in their lives.
Would you call someone who tries to buy things made in the US a hypocrite because they have some 'Made in China' products in their home?
Calling someone who is trying to make a difference a hypocrite doesn't solve anything. It's just reprehensible, IMO.
What difference does it make what people do? If they want to avoid eating meat, yet wear/carry leather, who cares? unless someone is pushing their ways onto others (and that goes for anything, religion, vegan-ism, politics, & so on), why does it matter? And even then, just tell them to p!ss off LOL. Everyone has their own opinions and ways of living.
If a person is vegetarian due to moral or ethical uneasiness yet still purchases leather bags, then yes, I would be intrigued as to the logical fallacy upheld by such a mentality.
I have such thoughts all the time. I was a nutritional vegan for many years, but I was still wearing leather shoes and holding leather bags. And I love fur but I would never buy new, I inherited my fur coat.
Sure I feel like a hypocrite. I feel compassion towards all animals and I don't want them killed for any reason but I still want to wear leather shoes. I'm weird like that. I think more animals are killed for food than for their leather and fur, so I don't feel the same guilt for the shoes and bags as I feel for eating meat and other animal products.
IDK I wish I was a better person and I could live 100% vegan, and not buy anything leather ever again. It is a hard decision.
The logic is that one doesn't wish to be the PRIMARY cause for an animal having been bred and/or killed.
In most cases, animals are PRIMARILY bred and/or killed for their meat and things like the skins are just by-products of either that animal, or an animal that was itself born as a by-product of the meat and/or dairy industry (male calves and so on).
That is a perfectly logical position to adopt.
I agree so much.
In the long run more animals will die or be harmed from the plastic industry byproducts by choosing PU bags.
Lol it is an Ispahan (La rose d'Ispahan), a dessert Pierre Hermé whipped up http://www.pierreherme.com/retrait-...36ph0A000108ph8440239&mid=244&cid=-1&size_1=1, but you can also find it in Laduree.Lily25 - a little OT here - but what is that yummy looking thing as your profile pic?![]()
Lol it is an Ispahan (La rose d'Ispahan), a dessert Pierre Hermé whipped up http://www.pierreherme.com/retrait-...36ph0A000108ph8440239&mid=244&cid=-1&size_1=1, but you can also find it in Laduree.