Just wanna say this because I am tired, in a way, of people complaining about Chanel quality issue.
Now people say their vintage bags are better and so on. So first of all we should consider that it is NOT Chanel fault if the leather is different or doesn’t feel the same, why? Because 10/20 years ago and more we lived in a different environment and animals were eating differently than today. Most people who complain about it they don’t consider this factor! Which is that food and environment and weather and all were SO much better in the past hence why, maybe things were better. Now can we demand that the bags that we have today are the same of the past? No! We can’t because these bags are made mostly of leather and it comes from animals. So every season is different cause they don’t use the same leather for 100 bags. You know what I mean right? So we have to accept that and deal with it. I really find it funny when I see people complaining because their o case from 5 season ago was so much better compared to their cardholder now. They don’t produce the same product from the same source. It’s impossible. So this is not Chanel fault. We can’t blame Chanel for this.
Then the things we can blame Chanel for are for example : the hardware and the stitching really. If those are defective so then yes it’s Chanel problem, yes it’s Chanel poor quality issue. But it’s not right to blame them for everything. Just wanted to share my thoughts. Please don’t be offended ❤️
I would disagree here. I think it's up to Chanel to ensure their leathers are top quality. I was in the H boutique a few weeks ago, and she said Chanel is notorious for picking up other discarded lots of leather that were subpar to the more high end houses like Hermes. They are well known for making things as cheap as possible while still churning out bags in the tens of millions per year, all the while raising prices. Where does it not fall on them to ensure their factories obtain the best leathers available? Why do other much less expensive houses procure much finer leathers (much thicker, more supple and more beautiful) and charge half the price? Go check out a Givenchy mystic PLEASE. Just play with it a minute, the leather is STUNNING. It's not that finer leathers are no longer available, it's that Chanel thinks slapping a CC on a second rate leather will still be a cute trick to the masses who only want to be seen for wearing a CC. Oh the power of the logo.
Now I still buy plenty of Chanel, but more RTW these days where the quality hasn't suffered as much (including their leathers tsk tsk). Def more Hermes gal for the bags, but I stick to Chanel for the "fun factor".
Also their dye & tanning processes have really suffered. Their leathers are no longer dyed through, and as someone else pointed out, the thinner leathers make that already flawed process even more cost efficient.
One of my top SA for Chanel kind of right sized my thought process about Chanel leather goods. She said that Chanel was always a clothing house, and bags were just meant to show the clothes complete with accessories. Chanel has never touted itself as a leather goods specialist, nor should we ever expect that level of quality from them in that respect. First and foremost, they are haute couture and RTW, and leather and "jewelry" were just add-ons that were never meant to represent the brand the way they do now. (This is also why Chanel doesn't care too much for non-RTW customers).
Hey Chanel, if you're out there - charge me MORE! I don't care. But use the finest materials you can find, with impeccable craftsmanship. I will come back 100% b/c to me it's more about quality than price....