Meanwhile, TOS has been making the rounds to promote his memoir at a dinner party the weekend before last (19 November) that was attended by investors, potential investors, and business associates. One of the guests was so horrified and disgusted at what TOS said that they told a source that they saw a man (TOS) who was deluded and who was unstable. Most of the guests were uncomfortable with TOS bringing up topics in his memoir, and when the host and others tried to change the subject, TOS got angry with them all and rudely persisted. They also noted whenever TOS repeated his stories, they altered each time at which point most guests realised the tales had little credibility.
Among the outbursts at the dinner party (TW was not invited) were defamatory comments about C3’s friends and inner circle (they could sue for defamation, as the family name means more than protecting C3’s wayward son, think of the renowned Second World War Prime Minister), and also a family tragedy in August 1979 that will be tied in with the August 1997 family tragedy. I don’t believe in conspiracy theories, but TOS was allegedly making accusations that the two tragic incidents are linked (same parties behind them!) and both involve his father.
Can C3 honestly expect all of his friends to remain silent if TOS attacks them? It’s one thing for C3 to stay silent, but should his friends (and their families) be defamed, and attacked by the world because C3 has no control over TOS? We’re talking about families with reputations spanning centuries, and why should they suffer due to C3’s inability to contain the damage that TOS and his wife have created?
Needless to say, investors will probably have to think twice about being associated with TOS or any of his business ventures, and some might be wisely considering extricating themselves at the earliest opportunity. It’s one thing to brag about having ties and an association with a member of the RF, but quite the opposite when it is someone who has a bad reputation and one whom the People have turned against. The point being, is that they wish to attract the masses for publicity, and not have people blacklist their brands for being linked to TOS. It goes without saying the investors and potential investors were not impressed with what they witnessed, and some might be having second thoughts about being investing money into controversial enterprises.
harrymarkle.wordpress.com
mol.im
It suits her.....
Thats what I want in my mashed potatoes - that scraggy fake hair that doesn't get washed.
