345parkave said:Hikarupanda, thanks for your input. I actually drew a bag on the paper in the size 227 and "tried" it on, it did look huge on me still. Am I going insane?
Luccibag said:Oh and I'd go with the 227 in gray if you can still locate one. I saw one at Saks NY the other day. It was gorgeous. I saw an off white reissue a week or so ago and it was pretty but the color seems like it might get dirty or get transfer marks. I'd only do light colors like that in caviar.
athena said:i do think the 228 is a little bit big on you.
Pink*Petunia said:I would go with the 227 in grey. It would look perfect on you.
hikarupanda said:But I picked 226 at the end coz I cannot even close the 225 after putting my fat wallet in (since the double flap does take up some spaces so it actually hold less than it appears!).
almudena said:From this post, I gather I must have bought the 225... I can't fit my wallet in it either, so when I'm using it, I just take out the money and put it in the front compartment!
almudena said:I have bought the 2006 reissue, and now that I think about it, the SA mentioned something like "Chanel made the new small size a bit larger than the original". I didn't pay much attention then to ask what exactly he meant, whether he meant from the 1955 original, or the reissue "original" (2005). Any ideas?