Michael Kors Nordstrom stores are scrapping Michael Kors handbags

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I don't care if I'm spending 300 or 3,000 bucks, I still expect a quality product. UGGS are one of those brands that went straight downhill in the last few years IMHO. I bought all of mine years ago and what's being sold now has bad stitching, thin fur, 1 boot looks and feels different from the other, crooked ugg tags and seams with glue showing. Just cheaply slapped together. My 10 year old UGGS are better made than the new stuff.
 
I have 2 Susannahs in lambskin. The lambskin from the outlet feels stiff and hard; the lambskin on the Susannahs is soft and buttery.


I bought a small Fulton bag in black lambskin (wonderful to touch) but saw the same bag later in a department store and I am am pretty sure that one was not lambskin. Maybe they make some bags of the same model in lambskin and others in calfskin. (My lambskin bag has a slight sheep-smell to it.)
 
I was one of the first few posters and as someone said, this thread was not in the MK forum when I posted. Personally, I wouldn't visit a brand forum and then trash the line so please know that was NOT what I did.


As for my opinion his stuff is "crap"; in my opinion it is. The few items I have purchased or were gifted did not wear well. I don't care if it's costs $10 or $1000; if it doesn't hold up to how I use something, it's a waste of my money and junk. Again, MY opinion, nothing else.


To those who love the brand, great and rock it with pride! That's all that matters in the end : )


Sorry, but that is exactly what you just did. Your last comment is disingenuous, by the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alternageek
Michael Kors sharpens its department store strategy

If you are a shopper who likes buying Michael Kors handbags on sale at department stores, you are going to be out of luck soon.

On its fourth-quarter earnings conference call, Michael Kors executives laid out a strategy to cut back on the number of products it sells to wholesalers, or retailers that sell many other brands, to better control pricing and protect brand image.

"We have built a very solid business with department stores, not only domestically but internationally. We think the channel is a very strong channel, across the world, great banners that we operate our brand inside of, and we support them 100 percent in good times and in difficult times," said CEO John Idol.

"That being said, what has happened in North America, in particular, and you are starting to see a little bit of it in Europe, is that as mall traffic has declined, stores have taken an aggressive position on promotional activity to generate volume and traffic into their buildings," he said. "And we have seen that, magnified, over the last 12 months. And we believe that — that long-term — that is not healthy for the Michael Kors brand."

Idol and Michael Kors CFO Joe Parsons told analysts and investors that pulling back on the number of products it sends to its department store partners will ultimately make the brand stronger.

"Reducing the amount going into the wholesale channel will actually create a healthier environment for our department store customers and partners, and ourselves. There will be less product, more demand, and that demand will be more at full price versus sale," Idol said.

Competitors including Coach and Kate Spade have also been working at culling promotions to preserve profit margins and brand image. For higher-end brands, deep discounting dents brand equity, so analysts and investors have been rewarding the short-term pain for long-term gain that goes with moving back toward full-price selling.

Parsons noted that Kors expects wholesale sales to decline in the high-teen percentage range.

Idol also took a shot back at some of the discussion suggesting that the Kors' brand is losing its luster.
"Our customer continues to respond to the brand. I see constant communication from various press-related things about you know, the brand is dead, or losing its vibrancy, etc., and that's just flat out not true," he said.
Last week, a note from Wedbush Securities analyst Lupine Skelly said her team spoke to 112 Nordstrom handbag managers at 54 stores who claimed they stopped carrying the MICHAEL Michael Kors handbags in May. The Wedbush note also said other Nordstrom stores said that line would be eliminated by the end of June because of waning interest from customers as well as Macy's constant discounting of Kors products.

Kors acknowledged Wednesday that it will be cutting the number of units it sells to department stores, but it will be continuing its relationships with department stores like Nordstrom.

In response to the Wedbush report, Nordstrom had told CNBC "we are not discontinuing our relationship with Michael Kors handbags and accessories," while also acknowledging "we continue to edit our offerings across our business to best meet our customers' needs."

CNBC report
June 1
 
I have 2 Susannahs in lambskin. The lambskin from the outlet feels stiff and hard; the lambskin on the Susannahs is soft and buttery.

just curious if have you ever felt/owned Chanel lambskin, or Balenciaga lambskin? *those* are real lambskin bags. i purchased a MK bag one time a few years ago, which said it was leather, and although it felt very soft, it was more like a vegan leather, something manufactured as opposed to real. i returned it, because it wasn't leather, regardless of the claim on the tag. i just wonder how many people believe his bags are truly leather? they don't feel that way at all, especially if you own the real luxury brands, you can just feel the difference. MK bags are very poor quality leather, if they even are.
 
just curious if have you ever felt/owned Chanel lambskin, or Balenciaga lambskin? *those* are real lambskin bags. i purchased a MK bag one time a few years ago, which said it was leather, and although it felt very soft, it was more like a vegan leather, something manufactured as opposed to real. i returned it, because it wasn't leather, regardless of the claim on the tag. i just wonder how many people believe his bags are truly leather? they don't feel that way at all, especially if you own the real luxury brands, you can just feel the difference. MK bags are very poor quality leather, if they even are.

I wonder if they are bonded leather....like what cheap "leather" couches are made of. Half plastic/half leather combo. I wonder that about Rebecca Minkoff bags too, because of the smell. It's not rich leather.
 
just curious if have you ever felt/owned Chanel lambskin, or Balenciaga lambskin? *those* are real lambskin bags. i purchased a MK bag one time a few years ago, which said it was leather, and although it felt very soft, it was more like a vegan leather, something manufactured as opposed to real. i returned it, because it wasn't leather, regardless of the claim on the tag. i just wonder how many people believe his bags are truly leather? they don't feel that way at all, especially if you own the real luxury brands, you can just feel the difference. MK bags are very poor quality leather, if they even are.

I am one of those people who believe his leather bags are made of real leather. I am sure there is a difference in the quality of the leather but you cannot claim that all of his bags are made of the fake PVC "leather" that you claim it is. Vegan leather is essentially plastic (I assume your aren't referring to the designer vegan, animal friendly cork material) and I am 100% sure that the soft leather MK bags I own are leather, unless he can fake the leather smell and the texture underneath the surface it it gets scratched (and yes I do own real luxury brands (if LV leather counts) to compare. People who buy and like MK bags can own real luxury brands and we can be very happy with our MK bags, to assume we don't know the difference because we can't afford a luxury designer is so condescending
 
  • Like
Reactions: LovingLV81
I am one of those people who believe his leather bags are made of real leather. I am sure there is a difference in the quality of the leather but you cannot claim that all of his bags are made of the fake PVC "leather" that you claim it is. Vegan leather is essentially plastic (I assume your aren't referring to the designer vegan, animal friendly cork material) and I am 100% sure that the soft leather MK bags I own are leather, unless he can fake the leather smell and the texture underneath the surface it it gets scratched (and yes I do own real luxury brands (if LV leather counts) to compare. People who buy and like MK bags can own real luxury brands and we can be very happy with our MK bags, to assume we don't know the difference because we can't afford a luxury designer is so condescending

the post wasn't directed to you, so there is no need to say anything negative. the attitude is not condescending at all, but some women - many of whom will never buy LV/Chanel, etc. won't know the difference. for instance, Calvin Klein says his bags are leather, but he doesn't use any animal leather, so people who don't research far enough won't know they aren't buying actual leather, but manufactured leather. i assumed MK is doing something similar. but if you believe that the bags are real leather, that's good enough, right? rock your MK bags. however, they are not a luxury leather, not at all. companies source leather from different places/countries and i suppose he is just sourcing from countries, not know for soft and rich leathers, maybe China/Thailand? the premium you pay for luxury brands ensures the leather is coming from a market that is known for its materials (ie Paris/Italy). i don't know where his bags are made, but I suspect they aren't coming out of there.
 
His Saffiano leather is like Prada Saffiano leather. The leather bags I have all have that real leather smell & feel as does the suede. Comments made that those who own MK & "believe" the bags are "real leather" is "good enough" does have a condescending tone. It's obvious from your statements that it's not good enough for you.

MK has his bags made in several different countries just like Prada & some other high end designers. While I personally think the quality of his older bags are better, quality issues abound in all brands across the board. Many designers are now having their bags made in China/Asia due to keeping costs of manufacturing bags to a minimum & their profits higher.
 
Michael Kors sharpens its department store strategy......

I found this whole article very interesting. I have just come back from New York and it us very clear that things are very different from the UK and I can see why his brand is maybe taking a hit. I am someone who likes a bargain but I also dislike seeing tables of bags (from all the designers mentioned) heaped up with massive discounts. I also feel there is no incentive to buy a newly released bag when it is 50% off a few weeks later. Over here the brand is still fairly exclusive but recently I have seen a few more reductions. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
 
I found this whole article very interesting. I have just come back from New York and it us very clear that things are very different from the UK and I can see why his brand is maybe taking a hit. I am someone who likes a bargain but I also dislike seeing tables of bags (from all the designers mentioned) heaped up with massive discounts. I also feel there is no incentive to buy a newly released bag when it is 50% off a few weeks later. Over here the brand is still fairly exclusive but recently I have seen a few more reductions. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

+1 The article is very informative & it will be interesting to see how this will all play out in the future.
 
the post wasn't directed to you, so there is no need to say anything negative. the attitude is not condescending at all, but some women - many of whom will never buy LV/Chanel, etc. won't know the difference. for instance, Calvin Klein says his bags are leather, but he doesn't use any animal leather, so people who don't research far enough won't know they aren't buying actual leather, but manufactured leather. i assumed MK is doing something similar. but if you believe that the bags are real leather, that's good enough, right? rock your MK bags. however, they are not a luxury leather, not at all. companies source leather from different places/countries and i suppose he is just sourcing from countries, not know for soft and rich leathers, maybe China/Thailand? the premium you pay for luxury brands ensures the leather is coming from a market that is known for its materials (ie Paris/Italy). i don't know where his bags are made, but I suspect they aren't coming out of there.

I was just responding to the open question about anyone believing it is real leather. I don't doubt that there will be significant difference in leather quality and I'm sure the tanning process has a major impact on quality.
 
just curious if have you ever felt/owned Chanel lambskin, or Balenciaga lambskin? *those* are real lambskin bags. i purchased a MK bag one time a few years ago, which said it was leather, and although it felt very soft, it was more like a vegan leather, something manufactured as opposed to real. i returned it, because it wasn't leather, regardless of the claim on the tag. i just wonder how many people believe his bags are truly leather? they don't feel that way at all, especially if you own the real luxury brands, you can just feel the difference. MK bags are very poor quality leather, if they even are.

I've felt both. Back to back on the same day in Atlanta. I wasn't impressed with Chanel. at those prices, angels should sing every time I wear the bag. My lifestyle just does not go with a bag that equates to 6 house payments. Luxury must not be my thing.
 
Top