Wow, with all this extra turnaround time, ebay had better remove the "shipping speed" DSR from the ratings. Even without this new service, buyers complain when items aren't hand-delivered next day!
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I agree, so far Authenticate4U have been very accurate.
And when you just think about the BS and unethical behavior that a few other authentication service owners and members have pulled here at tPF, I don't have any faith at all that Ebay's going to be able to figure out who are the honest ones and who are the incompetants, liars and cheats. Like everything else nowadays, it's all going to come down to plain and simple greed.
ETA - It sounds like a lot of the experienced posters at Ebay's Fashion Discussion Board are skeptical or downright negative too. Can't say I blame them.
http://community.ebay.com/t5/Fashion/AWESOME-NEWS-Ebay-Authenticate/m-p/26459399#U26459399
I assume SNAD for authenticity might be more difficult/impossible unless you use their service.Why would I pay eBay to authenticate from an anonymous authenticator when I can pay to get authentication from someone that I know of and trust?!?
Another too little, too late and not well executed "innovation" from eBay...
But if they rejected someone whose authentications were accepted in the past, they could be in hot water for conflict of interest. They were good enough then but not now?I assume SNAD for authenticity might be more difficult/impossible unless you use their service.
"But dear customer, this is the new and improved way of doing things! We're insisting on the best to protect you!" Eyeroll. It's certainly going to be interesting to see how this plays out.But if they rejected someone whose authentications were accepted in the past, they could be in hot water for conflict of interest. They were good enough then but not now?
But if they rejected someone whose authentications were accepted in the past, they could be in hot water for conflict of interest. They were good enough then but not now?
eBay isn't a private company. They've been public for 18 years.Unfortunately no. They're a private unregulated company that can unilaterally revise their terms of service at any time. They would have to violate other laws, like deceptive practices or laws regarding the sale of goods and services. By providing authentication, they may be exerting enough control over a transaction to be held liable for it, despite the terms of their user agreement (which you know will be updated to exculpate them from liability). It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
eBay isn't a private company. They've been public for 18 years.
So much for just being a venue. I know it has been a long while since they legitimately could make that claim but, this would appear to negate that claim.
Actually, that's been in ebay's TOS forever.So many corporations now are adding a new item to their TOS where their customers agree not to take part in any class action or ANY kind of legal action at all against the company in the event of a dispute or complaint, and forces them to accept binding arbitration instead, which can only be done on an individual basis and can be so costly and time-consuming that many individuals won't even bother after finding out what's involved. Banks, credit card and cable companies are infamous for adding it to their TOS's, contracts, etc, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if Ebay will have something like that into any signed agreement with them too.