Yesterday a prominent UK facelift surgeon admitted to his patient, “that part is notoriously difficult to hold as it’s the furthest away from the sutures”, “the same would happen anyway in a few months as that is the hardest to address and keep lifted” and that “even deep plane would have the same issue.”
And so in this case, ask for his revision policy. Your advice is excellent here. Perhaps try to persuade the consultant to agree to a reasonable one before surgery. Check the consultation letter. Or go for a second consult again to clarify.
On the one hand we have facelift surgeons globally selling facelifts that last 7-15 years and on the other hand we have surgeons confessing all facelifts relax at 4-6 months or it does not stay lifted after a few months, even deep plane.
Therefore, if what they say on paper or their sales tag does not match their actual performance, you could have reasonable grounds for asking for a revision, within a reasonable time period.
I would absolutely hold off on deep plane as it may be a last ditch facelift in my opinion because very few if any surgeon will take on revision of someone else’s deep plane and instead cite they do not want to deal with the scar tissue and the additional risk to the facial nerve from changes to the facial anatomy.
This is excellent advice! I must remember this.
Regarding credit card payments and Section 75, I believe that if we try to discuss with the consultant, and if he is unwilling, a legal letter stating your reasonable grounds could sometimes help the consultant to see your point of view, and carry out a revision. I think each case would depend on the length of time, what was stated in the original consulting letter, and reasonable expectations. Unless you show you are serious, sometimes the consultant will try to brush you off with a no.
I am not clear of the specifics of the Bray case, but he is not the surgeon for me, mainly because he is very dear. Additionally, to have to shell out another £20k for a revision by Bray after a year or two is not feasible, as a matter of principle, rather than economic concerns.
I would prefer a sympathetic surgeon who would try his best, a surgeon who is able to see sense and understand that 4 to 6 months in terms of facelift longevity is unreasonable, a surgeon who would want to set out to correct this short-lived facelift. Note that I am not saying the surgeon is terrible for performing a facelift that lasts only 4 to 6 months. I understand that there is a certain element of the unforeseeable where cosmetic surgery is concerned. However, it is only morally ethical, if charging £20 XXX amount, that a revision is carried out at the patient's request, if reasonable. Of course, the law is not about moral ethics at times.
I believe medicolegal issues are complicated and stressful. I have tried to put this down very simply. Every case differs.
It is only good to consider and think of all avenues or recourse.