Even if there are compromises like you said "I don't want you staying out late and partying" that's different than having a curfew. A curfew is what a parent gives a child. Or a controlling partner.
There certainly are perks in that kind of set up… but I don't think it's as luxurious as people are making it seem.
Has it occurred to you while maybe she is milking it with a book, she's writing her story at the same time and it's true? Others (not you) were saying that they think she could be lying in this book and I don't think she is. That's all I'm saying.
I was just asking because of the statement you made. A lot of women who are gold diggers will actually marry someone like this (Hefner did marry I believe), and people will say it's okay because hey he's paying the bills, he has the right to do whatever he wants and treat her however. It's her fault, she put herself in his way, right? I disagree. I think he's still at fault. I don't think giving someone money or supporting them financially gives them a free pass for their behavior… yet a lot of people do.
People are often quick to judge people who stay in abusive relationships, asking them why they stayed, why they put up with it, etc., and don't ask "Why did that person abuse?" or in this case "Why is this creepy old man obviously preying on young women, and taking advantage of them when they have drug addictions or come from horrible backgrounds?" There's another side to the coin which people often don't think of, and I was just trying to get people to think about that.
I'm glad you were able to leave and you did the right thing. Holly stayed for her own reasons, probably because she thought she would get something out of it. She seemingly regrets it and is now telling her story. That's all I'm saying.
Others were saying that they think she could be lying… and I was like

This guy is such a creep… how do you not believe that he was giving her drugs and emotionally abusive? At least give her the benefit of the doubt. I get that she's a gold digger, but at the same time, what she's saying about him just makes sense. People are quick to criticize her but not Hefner for taking advantage of women who have drug addictions and come from bad backgrounds? I think he's at fault and deserves some criticizing too.
I don't think she's crying wolf. I think it is what it is and she's telling her story. I think she realizes the mistakes she made, regrets it, and is now writing about it. "Cautionary Tales of a Former Playboy Bunny" suggests that she's just saying "Don't do what I did" not "Poor me." She can write about the bad things that he did (because let's face it, he's a pervert) while still accepting blame and responsibility for her own actions. I haven't read the book yet obviously.