Oh please -- she got everything she wanted, except the husband part so then she left.From what I've read from the articles, she's implying that he was controlling and psychologically and emotionally abusive.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Oh please -- she got everything she wanted, except the husband part so then she left.From what I've read from the articles, she's implying that he was controlling and psychologically and emotionally abusive.
Oh please -- she got everything she wanted, except the husband part so then she left.
No sympathy for them, what so ever... you want to avoid working a real job? You pay the price.
+1
Was she held against her will? I'm confused. Could she not leave?![]()
Oh please -- she got everything she wanted, except the husband part so then she left.
+1
Was she held against her will? I'm confused. Could she not leave?![]()
Agreed.
There was no abuse. They had employee rules like anyone else, the difference with them is that the reward was financially greater but the tasks were less dignified. Now they want to whinge about it when they've sucked everything out of it?
They were employees? I could have sworn they were his "girlfriends"
A boss would never give his "employees" curfews.
They were employees? I could have sworn they were his "girlfriends"
A boss would never give his "employees" curfews.
Weren't they given money in exchange for performing tasks?
Bosses do give time restrictions to their employees though. I don't see how this is any different, especially as they were living in the lap of luxury.
They were paid to be his girlfriends, so, yes, they worked for him. They did their part, followed the rules and got a nice paycheque for doing so. If they didn't do as requested, they could leave and be replaced.They were employees? I could have sworn they were his "girlfriends"
They were paid to be his girlfriends, so, yes, they worked for him. They did their part, followed the rules and got a nice paycheque for doing so. If they didn't do as requested, they could leave and be replaced.
with a husband and wife, there is usually love and one-on-one commitment. There are compromises which could include a husband or wife telling the spouse they aren't OK with them staying out late partying with friends, etc. (could be viewed as a curfew)And you don't see anything wrong with that?
May I ask you this. If it were a husband and wife, and the husband was controlling and emotionally abusing his wife, making her have a curfew, would that be okay, because he's paying the bills? A lot of people would say it is okay but I disagree.
But it wasn't a man and wife -- it was a woman who agreed to get paid for sex. She could leave anytime she wanted -- without a divorce lawyer!And you don't see anything wrong with that?
May I ask you this. If it were a husband and wife, and the husband was controlling and emotionally abusing his wife, making her have a curfew, would that be okay, because he's paying the bills? A lot of people would say it is okay but I disagree.
From what I've read from the articles, she's implying that he was controlling and psychologically and emotionally abusive.