@MrsS
@Star3777:
W/r/t the excerpt from the Wikipedia article... what I was trying to get at was the following...
And someone please correct if this is illogical:
(1) Assuming a shopaholic uses toys to compensate for loneliness --> Obtain greater number or greater value of toys (by this I mean greater % of net worth or whatever proxy you wish to use), more loneliness compensated.
(2) Assuming dependence on materials for emotional support --> Obtain greater number or greater value of materials, more emotional support.
(3) Assuming purchase substituted for affection --> Obtain greater number or greater value of purchases, more affection.
(4) Assuming preoccupation with shopping allows avoidance of everyday problems --> Obtain greater number or greater value of items, more avoidance of everyday problems.
Has nothing to do with what one can afford.
My issue is not with you discovering the behavioral patterns of a shopaholic. It is with the tone of whom these shopaholics could have been in the TPF in prior posts leading up to your input and it sounded like those who can afford to do reveals were being judged as the "shopaholics" beforehand. The negative association is what bothers me.
"The greater the price tag, the greater the effect?" - that does actually have to do with what one can afford and someone who can afford alot, may be judged as a "shopoholic" - with it's negative associations that you have posted.
Considering I have 4 exotics to reveal, I find it offensive to feel ashamed suddenly to post them, lest I be deamed a "shopaholic".
As you said if I feel any shame, one should not post. Fact is the shame is what you "could" think of me, not what I damn well know.
Whateva...life goes on...