Harry and Meghan Appreciation Thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#466
My question was in regard to the royal Rota Harry was referring to in his documentary, which happened to include a journalist who spoke negatively about Meghan that happened to lunch with Camilla. Not sure how that is off topic - we are appreciating them by bringing context to the noise that is surrounding them (which is drowned out by the negativity in the other thread) and the things they’ve shared in their documentary about the media. It’s all very relevant to me. but OK I am sure this post will be deleted as well.

Edit: If moderation is going to be based off of what a mod’s interpretation of what “appreciation” means, that’s fine, but the first post needs to be modified with the mods note to reflect that definition because we all have different ways of showing appreciation to the couple - of which, mine is calling out the gaslighting and BS of the orchestrated media attack against them. I have had a number of posts deleted in this thread that are about Meghan and/or Harry ONLY when members of TRF are mentioned in tandem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thanks
Reactions: AmalieLotte92, kcf68, Babydoll Chanel and 5 others
#467
PurseUOut said:
My question was in regard to the royal Rota Harry was referring to in his documentary, which happened to include a journalist who spoke negatively about Meghan that happened to lunch with Camilla. Not sure how that is off topic - we are appreciating them by bringing context to the noise that is surrounding them (which is drowned out by the negativity in the other thread) and the things they’ve shared in their documentary about the media. It’s all very relevant to me. but OK I am sure this post will be deleted as well.
Click to expand...
Should we start a thread called “I feel somewhere on the neutral spectrum about Meghan and Harry” :lol:
 
  • Haha
  • Thanks
Reactions: mikimoto007, papertiger, AmalieLotte92 and 5 others
#469
PurseUOut said:
My question was in regard to the royal Rota Harry was referring to in his documentary, which happened to include a journalist who spoke negatively about Meghan that happened to lunch with Camilla. Not sure how that is off topic - we are appreciating them by bringing context to the noise that is surrounding them (which is drowned out by the negativity in the other thread) and the things they’ve shared in their documentary about the media. It’s all very relevant to me. but OK I am sure this post will be deleted as well.

Edit: If moderation is going to be based off of what a mod’s interpretation of what “appreciation” means, that’s fine, but the first post needs to be modified with the mods note to reflect that definition because we all have different ways of showing appreciation to the couple - of which, mine is calling out the gaslighting and BS of the orchestrated media attack against them. I have had a number of posts deleted in this thread that are about Meghan and/or Harry ONLY when members of TRF are mentioned in tandem.
Click to expand...
This is the first post on the other thread as the sticky...

"Hi!
A friendly reminder to stick to Harry and Meghan, a little off topic is natural, but not for pages. Let's stick to topic please. No politics, discussion about members, etc…. :tender:"

So if they are allowed to go "a little off topic" I think the same flexibility should be given here. The mod's interpretation of off topic here is much more stringent. I'm just saying :shrugs::shrugs:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Babydoll Chanel, prettyprincess, djuna1 and 2 others
#470
Addicted to bags said:
This is the first post on the other thread as the sticky...

"Hi!
A friendly reminder to stick to Harry and Meghan, a little off topic is natural, but not for pages. Let's stick to topic please. No politics, discussion about members, etc…. :tender:"

So if they are allowed to go "a little off topic" I think the same flexibility should be given here. The mod's interpretation of off topic here is much more stringent. I'm just saying :shrugs::shrugs:
Click to expand...

This thread is regularly “a little off topic” in all fairness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: papertiger, CobaltBlu, Starflower2305 and 1 other person
#471


FkI224WXoAAW1gA

FkI224XX0AINAfc
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: kcf68, M_Butterfly, Mimmy and 1 other person
#477
Addicted to bags said:
This is the first post on the other thread as the sticky...

"Hi!
A friendly reminder to stick to Harry and Meghan, a little off topic is natural, but not for pages. Let's stick to topic please. No politics, discussion about members, etc…. :tender:"

So if they are allowed to go "a little off topic" I think the same flexibility should be given here. The mod's interpretation of off topic here is much more stringent. I'm just saying :shrugs::shrugs:
Click to expand...
I don’t understand why the other thread can talk about the Clarkson article for pages but it can’t be discussed here. It’s been the top headline about MM and H all weekend.
 
  • Like
  • Thanks
Reactions: prettyprincess, M_Butterfly, D1SoCaligirl and 5 others
#479
mrsinsyder said:
After watching the documentary, I definitely think she thought she “knew” - she assumed the attention would be like it is in Hollywood. She wasn’t prepared for a whole machine made off of stories about them every day.
Click to expand...

Yeah I definitely think she glamorized being with “Prince” Harry in the beginning. And with him being the spare, the pressure wouldn’t be on her like it was on Kate dating William. Honestly if she were my 35+ divorcee biracial American friend, and a British prince fancied her, I would say she hit the romantic lottery and encourage her to lock him down too lol. I couldn’t imagine what her fate would be after marriage.

Judging by her demeanor at the wedding, I think Doria appeared to show concern about the life her daughter was marrying into.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmalieLotte92 and M_Butterfly
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top