Does anyone use Poshmark?

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

PM doesn't have an appeal process. They email you their final word and there's nothing you can do about it. You can't change their minds even if you send them proof of Authentication. I don't own or sell high end stuff but I had one pair of heels from JCPENNEY that were similar to YSL heels. I had mentioned the similarity in the description and they had removed my listing. I forget the exact reason they stated and I already deleted the email after rolling my eyes. It's so silly because mine weren't even fakes trying to be the real designer brand and they allow people to sell designer fakes All.The.Time!
 
So my account has been limited, because they "couldn't verify the authenticity" of my item. Ugh, I do not sell things of which I'm not absolutely certain about the authenticity. I started offloading my stuff on PM in high hopes that their authenticators would be a bit more competent than Vesitiare's, but apparently this is not the case. I will appeal/request another review and submit an authentication from a 3rd party to clear my name, but just hate to spend money on something that is supposed to be PM's job (item was over $500). What I'm worried about now is that I currently have 2 pending sales and the items are on their way to Posh's headquarters for an authenticity check and I have no clue what they are going to do with those now that my account has been limited (or that these items will even be authenticated correctly). Has this ever happened to anyone?
Their inability to "verify the authenticity" is not due to your item not having enough details to conclude it's authentic. Rather, it's their lack of knowledge and expertise to be able to know what details to look for to verify authenticity. THEY couldn't verify authenticity because they don't know what the heck they are doing. The app itself is fine. But the people running it are terrible at customer service. You would get no answer or the run around if you challenge their authentication "team's" credibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeenBurned
I don't know if they are still doing this but I think it was also very bad when they were asking random users to authenticate. I wonder what prompted that idea. [emoji849]
They still do. I just had a pop up notification for it yesterday. I really hope they don't rely on random user opinions alone for takedowns.
 
They still do. I just had a pop up notification for it yesterday. I really hope they don't rely on random user opinions alone for takedowns.
That's terrible. I know some vtg Coach but when I got requests to authenticate it was all over across the brands. It's one thing if they analyzed my specific purchases and my "likes" and asked accordingly, then I can see some logic behind it though it doesn't qualify me as an authenticator in any shape or form. But they were asking me to authentic things I have no clue about! [emoji53]
 
That's terrible. I know some vtg Coach but when I got requests to authenticate it was all over across the brands. It's one thing if they analyzed my specific purchases and my "likes" and asked accordingly, then I can see some logic behind it though it doesn't qualify me as an authenticator in any shape or form. But they were asking me to authentic things I have no clue about! [emoji53]
Me too. I confirmed a few items I was absolutely sure of, but there were tons of clothing and streetwear brands that I knew absolutely nothing about, and don't have in my search/like history. I just clicked 'not sure' for everything.
 
Or if you try to help, you find yourself booted from Poshmark! :annoyed:

I don't know if they are still doing this but I think it was also very bad when they were asking random users to authenticate. I wonder what prompted that idea. [emoji849]

They still do. I just had a pop up notification for it yesterday. I really hope they don't rely on random user opinions alone for takedowns.
I was never asked (by PM) to verify authenticity of Coach. I was tagged by users who wanted my opinion and evidently reported by the sleazy sellers.
 
The article is really old by this point in time, but I read on Forbes that posh contracts their authentications.

Here’s a blog posting (also old) where one of the contracted companies talks about the process a bit. I’m not sure if this is still one of the contracted authenticators (it’s from 2016) or how many posh might use. I never found any info to indicate that posh does any of it in-house—i think the items over $500 that are going to headquarters are just photographed to send to these outsourced authenticators or occasionally ship to them, but I don’t have any definite knowledge of this. It’s just my suspicion.

https://closetfullofcash.com/getting-to-know-*****************-com/

ETA: For whatever reason it won’t display the actual link. Maybe I’m a noob. But replace all the asterisks with “*****************” and it should work

ETA take 2: “authenticate” and “first” all one word. Sheesh!
 
Last edited:
PM doesn't have an appeal process. They email you their final word and there's nothing you can do about it. You can't change their minds even if you send them proof of Authentication. I don't own or sell high end stuff but I had one pair of heels from JCPENNEY that were similar to YSL heels. I had mentioned the similarity in the description and they had removed my listing. I forget the exact reason they stated and I already deleted the email after rolling my eyes. It's so silly because mine weren't even fakes trying to be the real designer brand and they allow people to sell designer fakes All.The.Time!
It was probably similar to ebay in that you can't mention a brand that your item isn't. You aren't allowed to point out the similarity to a designer brand in your listing. On ebay, it is called keyword spamming. It makes your item show up in a search someone does for YSL, and they might inadvertently actually think they are getting that brand.
 
It was probably similar to ebay in that you can't mention a brand that your item isn't. You aren't allowed to point out the similarity to a designer brand in your listing. On ebay, it is called keyword spamming. It makes your item show up in a search someone does for YSL, and they might inadvertently actually think they are getting that brand.
Oh, I didn't know that. that what happened to me as a buyer. I got email notification about newly listed Topshop sandals. they were called Topshop in title and both Topshop and Office in description (brand listed as "office").I bought them thinking they are Topshop and office maybe is the name of the line. Turned out they were not Topshop, they had completely different fit and I couldn't wear them. I emailed the seller, she told me that this is the brand sold in Topshop stores, she mentioned "office" in description (though she never used "sold in"). so I should piss off because her description is correct and no returns allowed. It was just $37, so I let it go. But I guess I would have point here if I wanted to push return.
 
I've never personally had experience because I don't do business with the company because I don't like their business practices. Perhaps someone who had a similar experience will chime in.

What bugs the sh!t out of me is Poshmark's lack of expertise and lack of willingness to admit they're wrong even when it couldn't be more obvious!

I'll relate just one of many cases I've witnessed as an authenticator and will try to make it as concise as possible.

  • Buyer purchased a relatively inexpensive Coach bag (well under the threshhold where PM authenticates)
  • Buyer received and questioned authenticity on AT Coach
  • Item was confirmed as obvious fake with known invalid serial number/creed and construction elements
  • Buyer opened dispute; Poshmark looked at listing and deemed bag as authentic.
  • Buyer appealed and as goodwill gesture, PM agreed to inspect the bag in person, instructing the buyer to ship it to them.
  • Poshmark received bag, examined it in person and again deemed it authentic but offered the buyer a refund to make her happy.
If Poshmark can make these types of mistakes on a Coach bag that is so obviously fake that it shouldn't have needed an expert, one can only imagine the mistakes they've made (and will continue to make) on luxury brands.
I'm moving soon and while gathering all my stuff and conducting inventory, I had my moment of enlightenment and realized I need to thin out my collection. In an effort to do so, and because I got frustrated with Vestiaire's authentication team, I thought I'd give PM a try.
You are correct. For the short time that I've been actively selling on Poshmark, I've seen an incredible amount of fake items. From $20 fakes to the better "super" fakes. Reporting doesn't seem to help and if occasionally they do remove a listing, it's for a poorly constructed, hurt-to-look-at fake. The better ones remain. This makes me wonder if reports are even reviewed by their authenticators and if they are, does this mean that their authentication team does not recognize these items as fake? Or they do, but simply don't care to remove? I have to take a minute to ponder which is worse.
Not only have I reported many listings (to no avail), I've also emailed Posh only to get generic replies that they will be looking into this and in the future to use the report button. Of course, they didn't look into anything, 'cause those scammers with closets full of fakes (with sprinkled in a few authentic ones) are still running wild on their site. I've reached out to numerous (potential) victims, but find this too time consuming, and in a few cases these buyers believed the scammer's version of the truth and turned around calling me the trouble maker. So needless to say I stopped. It's astounding to see the amount of buyers that are being/have been scammed on Posh with absolutely no consequences for the scammers. Most of these transactions are under the $500 threshold, or via PP. Not only do I now question their authenticators' expertise, but also PM's integrity. Why won't they delete listings of fakes and let scammers continue to roam free? I've seen mistakes made by PM in the ATC thread, but seeing that no one is always right 100% of the time, I had hoped that these were just isolated incidents.

If that Coach you mentioned is a horrid fake (and no expertise is needed to tell), it's worrying, or even downright scary that they aren't able to recognize it as such.

If not for some issues I ran into with Vestiaire's authenticators, I wouldn't have moved to PM. After 4 cases of incorrect authentication by VC, where I had to fight, appeal, call, email, explain, provide links/examples and in 2 cases also authenticity certificates by a reputable third party for my funds to be finally released (yes, they took their sweet time), I got so exhausted and thought I would try my luck elsewhere. The sad thing is that these items were fairly easy to authenticate, too. It's so ironic, I sell on VC, because I thought it would be stress-free (aka no scam buyers), but now it's their authentication team that stresses me out. Every time I sell something, it's hoping and praying that their authenticators would get it right. Seems like I'm going through the same thing with Posh now. I've never had an item rejected in all my years of selling to Fashionphile and Yoogis. It's just the lowballing that puts me off and made me want to set my own price. I've always thought that if what you send in is authentic, you wouldn't have to worry about it being rejected on grounds of authenticity. For certain items I can understand that mistakes are made if authentication is based on pics alone, but if you have the item in your hands and you can feel, smell, compare, but most importantly take your own pictures of all the needed details exactly the way you want them, I'm surprised by the incorrect authentications, especially when these items are fairly easy to authenticate and didn't need physical inspection to begin with.
 
I don't use Poshmark but we've seen numerous cases where they've been wrong about authenticity. I agree with Beenburned that the Coach mistakes we've seen were obvious. You didn't have to have an extensive knowledge of the brand to recognize the fake.

Were these Chanel items? By limiting you, have they prevented you from putting up other items? I don't have any advice to offer except to see if there is an appeal process and move your items to another venue. Do you use Tradesy or Mercari?

By limiting my account, not only can I not create new listings, they also deleted all the items I already had in my closet. It's scary that they (probably any rep working there) can limit your account, or even ban you (in which case you'll no longer be able to log in) on a whim. What if you still have pending sales, or funds not yet withdrawn? At least they don't pull this stunt at Vestiaire.
This ordeal really leaves a bad taste in my mouth, 'cause though I'm sure I will be able to prove my case (item is easy to authenticate and beyond any doubt authentic, period), it's just a colossal waste of time and time is not something I have a lot of at the moment.

Posh doesn't really have an appeal process like Ebay. The only thing you can do is emailing them mentioning your order #. There is a phone #, but all you will get is a voicemail redirecting you to their email support. Come to think of it, how is it possible that such a huge company does not have phone support where you actually get to talk to a rep?

I don't sell on Tradesy and Mercari (but do buy from occasionally), due to my lack of iron nerves and my fear for scam buyers. At least at VC and Posh (for items $500 and more) buyers can't claim to have received a box of rocks, or something funny. I've been reading this forum (Ebay) for too long and all the horror stories completely scared me off from selling on any site where I don't at least have some sort of "protection"

I'm not certain about Mercari, but will look into Tradesy if you can recommend it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whateve
I don't know if they are still doing this but I think it was also very bad when they were asking random users to authenticate. I wonder what prompted that idea. [emoji849]
I don't understand their requests to review reported listings either. Don't tell me this is how they determine which listings to delete and which to keep active. Isn't reviewing their authenticators' job? Out of curiosity I decided to try my hand at "reviewing" these listings and I got so many reported listings of Gucci. Seeing that I only have 2 Gucci bags and know next to nothing about their markers of authenticity, how can I possibly give any input? If Posh depends on random people to tell them what's real vs fake, no wonder it's an epic fail.
 
Top