Consigning/buying with The Real Real TRR

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

apologies if this has already been asked, but i scrolled through and didn't see this addressed.
does anybody have experience with TRR selling them an inauthentic bag with a no return policy? i'm pretty sure the bag i just ordered isn't authentic and i want to know if anyone has been able to successfully recover their money despite the no return policy. i'm so frustrated!

They guarantee authenticity. If you have it authenticated and its deemed a fake they will take it back. Make sure you ask for a prepaid return label and a refund of your shipping fee if it turns out to be fake.
 
apologies if this has already been asked, but i scrolled through and didn't see this addressed.
does anybody have experience with TRR selling them an inauthentic bag with a no return policy? i'm pretty sure the bag i just ordered isn't authentic and i want to know if anyone has been able to successfully recover their money despite the no return policy. i'm so frustrated!

Yes, they'll take it back. It happened to me.
 
In reading over some reviews of The Real Real online, this one caught my eye: (Review isn't mine)

“Consignors Beware!!!!!”

"I sent several items to be consigned on August 31. I was told I'd receive 60% commission. The items were listed and they sold $1428 in the month of September. Strangely one of my items, a $425 Burberry coat was not listed for sale for a month. I had to email to get them to list it. On my online account it listed my commission as 60% which would be paid on October 15. Suddenly on October 1 the online account showed 55% commission. It stated that I needed to sell $72 more to be entitled to the 60% commission- any amount under that would be 55%. I contacted customer service and was told that they changed their policy on October 1. Clearly bait and and switch!!! How can they change our commission agreement retroactively? Why did they hold back an item to make it difficult to reach the minimum? I'm fighting it but it does not appear that they are trustworthy."

https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/www.therealreal.com


For those who consign with The Real Real, it seems that this reviewer is indeed accurate. Apparently, the "Consignor Terms" have changed as of Oct. 1st. Instead of receiving 60% (not to mention coupon codes) it's now 55%.
 
In reading over some reviews of The Real Real online, this one caught my eye: (Review isn't mine)

“Consignors Beware!!!!!”

"I sent several items to be consigned on August 31. I was told I'd receive 60% commission. The items were listed and they sold $1428 in the month of September. Strangely one of my items, a $425 Burberry coat was not listed for sale for a month. I had to email to get them to list it. On my online account it listed my commission as 60% which would be paid on October 15. Suddenly on October 1 the online account showed 55% commission. It stated that I needed to sell $72 more to be entitled to the 60% commission- any amount under that would be 55%. I contacted customer service and was told that they changed their policy on October 1. Clearly bait and and switch!!! How can they change our commission agreement retroactively? Why did they hold back an item to make it difficult to reach the minimum? I'm fighting it but it does not appear that they are trustworthy."

https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/www.therealreal.com


For those who consign with The Real Real, it seems that this reviewer is indeed accurate. Apparently, the "Consignor Terms" have changed as of Oct. 1st. Instead of receiving 60% (not to mention coupon codes) it's now 55%.
I'm not sure that's legal. While I don't know contract law and I'm aware that TOS can be subject to change, I'm not sure they can retroactively do what they're doing.

If someone consigns an item and the commission at the time of consignment is a certain amount, that's an agreement made between the two parties. For TRR to change that agreement without the acceptance of the consignor is wrong.

In this type of case, with a company the size of TRR and the amount of money involved, I'd check with the attorney general's consumer protection division, starting in the states where they're registered.

I believe they CAN change their fees anytime but can't reduce the payout on items received and agreed to prior to the change.

I don't do business with TRR because I don't like many of their ways of doing business but if someone is getting hit by this new change, I'd recommend going after them.

ETA: If someone knows contract law, I'd love to know what they think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikki_
I'm not sure that's legal. While I don't know contract law and I'm aware that TOS can be subject to change, I'm not sure they can retroactively do what they're doing.

If someone consigns an item and the commission at the time of consignment is a certain amount, that's an agreement made between the two parties. For TRR to change that agreement without the acceptance of the consignor is wrong.

In this type of case, with a company the size of TRR and the amount of money involved, I'd check with the attorney general's consumer protection division, starting in the states where they're registered.

I believe they CAN change their fees anytime but can't reduce the payout on items received and agreed to prior to the change.

I don't do business with TRR because I don't like many of their ways of doing business but if someone is getting hit by this new change, I'd recommend going after them.

ETA: If someone knows contract law, I'd love to know what they think.

You bring up some valid points.

If a consignor sends them merchandise to sell prior to their TOS change on Oct. 1st, how could they change the payout percentage? Is that even legal to do?
 
You bring up some valid points.

If a consignor sends them merchandise to sell prior to their TOS change on Oct. 1st, how could they change the payout percentage? Is that even legal to do?
My point exactly! I think the consignor would win a lawsuit (Judge Judy, are you on board?) if TRR pulled that!

And as a principle gal, I'd go after TRR if they did that to me. (But then again, not liking the way they do business, I don't buy from nor sell to them. Plus, from what I've read on other threads on TPF, they don't seem to care what they're customers want.)
 
My point exactly! I think the consignor would win a lawsuit (Judge Judy, are you on board?) if TRR pulled that!

And as a principle gal, I'd go after TRR if they did that to me. (But then again, not liking the way they do business, I don't buy from nor sell to them. Plus, from what I've read on other threads on TPF, they don't seem to care what they're customers want.)

If it was me, I'd file a complaint with the California dept of consumer affairs and see what happens next. No need to take them to court when you can get the attorney general to put the pressure on for you.
 
If it was me, I'd file a complaint with the California dept of consumer affairs and see what happens next. No need to take them to court when you can get the attorney general to put the pressure on for you.
True. That's why I mentioned the attorney general in my previous post. :)

Although seeing TRR trying to defend this practice in front of a bull like Judge Judy would be fun!
 
I keep trying to score Chanel brooches on TRR and I check religiously throughout the day. However they are always sold before I even see they are listed. Has anyone had success with scoring Chanel on TRR? Any tips?
 
Top