I would like to argue that newer bags today cost over $2000 easily and the quality of 20 year old bags are way better. So for $1700 if it's in very good condition or better is a bargain.
Also, inflation!
If I'm paying $6/dozen eggs today, then $1.5k for a City that cost ~$1095 21 years ago
almost seems like a bargain!

(That might read sarcastic, but I meant it relatively seriously, lololol)
I'm definitely guilty of buying bags (and eggs, haha) at these "new" prices because 21 years ago, I didn't have the budget for it - but I'm totally cool with it, if the condition passes whatever standards I may have (it's clearly debatable if I have any), since I see emotional value in it.
The greater cause of annoyance imo, is TRR pricing which has definitely gone through the charts, since I last made the "
y'all, TRR's pricing has always been weird!" post.
... like, their pricing algorithm is a bit of a not so good joke and should really have some human reviewing it, because $1k for the Monk Multi-Zip that's missing two tassels, strap, and no mention of mirror is kinda quite high unless you're an avid collector and it's an HG, imho... but I guess on the other hand, other than the missing tassels and strap, it's in pretty good condition and the handles look like the edgepaint is still intact... - dang, why do I always start things wanting to find flaws and then end up selling myself that something isn't
that bad?! LOL
