I think looking back, and talking to members privately, they aren't sure taking a bag apart will change anyone's mind really and if its worth it to prove the point. Certain parties can not be named to protect their disclosures and findings, and I think that makes sense. I myself had been told by a long time SA who has worked with repairs months ago, that the 22 bags are not full leather...but really does it matter to anyone? You can take from that what you would like. People love the brand and if they want to buy a bonded leather bag for 6k so be it!
I'm questioning the seasonable bags as are many of my colleagues but not many want to talk about it publicly. As a consumer, I know when a brand is proud of their quality they miss no opportunity to talk about it at every level. As I look at this brand, I don't see transparency about the leather. It occurs to me that the only place leather is mentioned is on the website where it refers to a bag as lambskin etc. Someone in this thread mentioned earlier, that a bag can be called lambskin, calfskin or leather using only 40% of real leather I believe. Every consumer who wants transparency should ask for themselves, and it depends on how knowledgable your SA is and if they know the info. Ask yourself what really matters to you going forward. What does luxury mean to you? What makes that 6k bag worth it? All of us need to answer that question for ourselves. But know this, most luxury brands are not selling quality. They are selling the story, and the high price.