--- Authenticate This Gucci ---

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe it's just the way the picture was taken, but the imprint on the leather tag doesn't look right. Anyone else?

I agree w/hurleychic12...maybe you could ask for a better close up pic of the tag, as of right now from the one shown it does seem off. If you are going to ask for another pic might as well ask for a close up non blurry photo of the back of the tag too.
 
Yes, the seller has been very helpful in sending me additional photos, and she does offer a money back guarantee - but isn't this quite easy to say?

Yeah, I would also like some more responses, but maybe people just don't have a clue with this particular bag? ;)

But thank you so much for your answers so far!
You are welcome, I really wish I could be of more help, I think you're right you might not have gotten many any other responses because of lack of familiarity with this bag. Just make sure if you do decide to get it that you pay by credit card & preferably also pay pal so you have some recourse.
 
they both look fake to me.. sorry.

Can you tell me why they look fake to you, just so I know for future?! Thank you for saying so, I really was going to bid!! You've just saved me a lot of money, and a huge disappointment!

Perhaps it's worth making a list of the authentic eBay sellers, if anyone has the time, to help sheppard us newbies.

Thanks again for the reply! :)
 
eBay: Large Gucci Signature Web Leather Tote (item 260079213895 end time Jan-30-07 06:47:30 PST)

Hi all~!

Was just randomly looking for a laptop tote and stumbled upon this - it's cute but the seller has so few feedback and there are just a whole bunch of ambiguities regarding the authenticity (and I'm no expert).

So I figured I'd bring it over here and let all you professionals give me some advice on it~!

Is it real? Should I get it?

Thanks all~

Our bag obsessions must go on.....:sweatdrop:


The bag looks ok to me.
 
Hm, it seems the links to my pictures aren't working so I'll have to repost. If anyone could authenticate this either in this read or by PM that would be great!

Let's try this again:

BAG:
IMG_0002.jpg

IMG_0005.jpg

IMG_0007.jpg


SHOES:
IMG_0008.jpg

IMG_0009.jpg

IMG_0012.jpg

Does anyone else have any definitive opinion on these?
Or perhaps an idea of someone like My Poupette I could go to and ask?
 

Attachments

  • charmy5.jpg
    charmy5.jpg
    93.3 KB · Views: 25
  • charmy6.jpg
    charmy6.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 27
Ladies,

The seller provided me with more close up pics of the purse. I had to shrink the pics a little since the file she sent was too big to upload. She said the back of the tag read "154982" followed by "3444". Let me know what you think.

Thanks.
Yeah, for shure I think the tag is off now. Font looks too skinny IMO. Anyone else?
 
Thanks for the heads up emald37 vbmenu_register("postmenu_1724288", true); ! How about this bag? Have my eyes deceived me? I appreciate every reply!

eBay: MINT CLASSIC GUCCI GG MONOGRAM JACKIE O HOBO BAG!!!!! (item 220076352527 end time Feb-03-07 15:24:01 PST)

Thanks in advance!
Not sure, either way I think you need better non blurry photos of the inside tag(both front & back) and of the gold hardware on the front of the bag, all these photos are blurry in the auction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top