Alexander Skarsgård

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

That is too bad about the reviews. I did not expect them to be great but I'll admit I had concerns about the plot too (which seems to be the main complaint aside from the CGI). It still basically seems to be (from the trailers) a Tarzan saves Jane plot despite Jane not being a damsel in distress. We'll see how it does at the box office - 98% wanting to see it is encouraging. Maybe it will find its place despite the poor reviews. It could still be an enjoyable popcorn film.

HQs of Alex arriving at LAX today (June 29, 2016):



Source: AlexanderSkarsgardOnline Tumblr
 
Last edited:
True enough, audiences are very PC - but you can hardly blame them in a climate where Scarlett Johannssen gets cast in an iconic Japanese role, that awful film Gods of Egypt gets cast with all-white actors, they try to pass Emma Stone off as part Hawaiian/part Japanese in Aloha and Daniel Craig has just been cast as the protagonist in a film with Halle Berry about the LA Riots.

I digress but there's no doubting the original ERB books had a fair amount of "better than thou" attitude when it came to indigenous populations and with the obvious wrong of that, people's first hurdle of a film like Tarzan has to be to overcome what could look like from the outside a white-saviour film, even though the film itself is sensitive to that and changes the angle. And I totally get that, and it's not irrelevant.

However the same could be said for the Indiana Jones films and people really love those. It's an adventure re-telling of an unfortunate time in history for many indigenous people.

I don't doubt that they've handled it well. For me, it's more a concern regarding commentary on the CGI and the actors.


And like I said - I'm still going to watch it.

Indiana Jones, which is one of my favorite franchises, is what I was hoping this movie would be like. I've seen a few comparisons to it from viewer reactions, so maybe it is. What's puzzling me is the dramatic differences in reviews. Some say the CGI is incredible and others say it sucks. There's no consensus. With ID2, every review that I read had the same basic issue. No storyline. And I'm under the impression that the acting in Tarzan is actually very sound from everyone involved because I'm really not seeing anything that says that any particular actor is terrible. It's more like nit picky *****ing than anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreeSpirit71
Indiana Jones, which is one of my favorite franchises, is what I was hoping this movie would be like. I've seen a few comparisons to it from viewer reactions, so maybe it is. What's puzzling me is the dramatic differences in reviews. Some say the CGI is incredible and others say it sucks. There's no consensus. With ID2, every review that I read had the same basic issue. No storyline. And I'm under the impression that the acting in Tarzan is actually very sound from everyone involved because I'm really not seeing anything that says that any particular actor is terrible. It's more like nit picky *****ing than anything else.

Same. I was hoping for that as well.
 
A very positive LOT-review:
( I like it) :smile:

Review: The Legend of Tarzan – Jungle heroics and alternative histories

June 29, 2016 Bob LeeperColumns, Movies, Top story

The Legend of TarzanThere hasn’t been a live-action Tarzan film in almost two-decades, quite a drought for a franchise that has produced over fifty films in the past century. But regardless of the abundance of historic movies featuring the Lord of the Jungle, many fans have been waiting their entire lives to see a true, realistic representation of Ape Man’s adventures on the big screen; and with The Legend of Tarzan that wait is finally over.
If you ever read the Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan novels, then you’ve had the look and feel of the Ape Man’s world and his exploits etched into your mind’s eye, as if with a badass and rather large hunting knife. Now you get to see the hero swing through the jungle and interact with the great apes in what is probably the most life-like way imaginable – and that alone is worth the price of admission into this wonderful movie.
Written by Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer, and directed by David Yates (of mostly Harry Potter film fame), The Legend of Tarzan is the almost perfect trifecta of a romance movie, a heroic adventure film, and a historical period drama; although the ‘history’ is certainly skewed for entertainment purposes.
Lord Greystoke (AKA John Clayton III, AKA Tarzan – as played by Alexander Skarsgard) has successfully adapted to civilization, but reluctantly returns to Africa with his high-spirited and not-so-hesitant wife, Jane (Margot Robbie), and real-life American Civil War hero, George Washington Williams (Samuel L. Jackson), in order to investigate the evil doings of Belgian’s King Leopold and his henchman, Captain Leon Rom (Christoph Waltz), who is in cahoots with Chief Mbonga (Djimon Hounsou), whom has an old score to settle with the Ape Man.
The film is set, as it should be, in the latter 1800s, and it mixes real history and political intrigue with the fictional hero’s century-old stories, which are in turn mashed-up together into one cohesive narrative. Will it help your enjoyment of the film if you have knowledge of both the Burroughs’ fiction and the historical facts? Sure, but it’s absolutely not necessary.
The Legend of Tarzan is woven with flashbacks of Tarzan’s ape-centric origin and his first interactions with Jane. Like with each Tarzan film before, artistic license has been taken with the source material that, in this case, appears to come from the first two Tarzan books. But fans will recognize bits of material from throughout the Ape Man mythos.
The Legend of TarzanIf you are a purist, you may be concerned with some missing pieces in this tweaked version of the story (the absence of the hero’s legendary knife comes immediately to mind), but if you are a die-hard fan I think you’re excitement for this film will temper any nerdy technical complaints.
Skarsgard’s Tarzan is good natured and humble while being stoic and physically imposing, with an animalistic glare powerful enough to make most men cower. Fans of the books will immediately recognize this hero as the godlike athlete that was conceived by Burroughs. That said, the actor also convincingly provides the Greystoke persona with a timidity one might see in a scared, but still dangerous beast wandering loose in the streets of nineteenth century London.
Part of the fun, and hence the movie’s title, is that Lord Greystoke is not necessarily thrilled with the narrative (or legend) that has been created surrounding his life among by apes. He doesn’t seek attention, but still, uncomfortably, finds himself in the spotlight, in both England and in his former African home.
The Legend of Tarzan’s Jane, as embodied by Margot Robbie, is the perfect companion to the Ape Man. As Skarsgard does with Tarzan, Robbie brings the literary character to bold and brilliant life. She’s strong, independent and dangerous when cornered – not to mention classy and breathtakingly beautiful.
Adding Samuel L. Jackson to the cast as George Washington Williams is a stroke of genius. Not only does he bring well deserved attention to the life of a real world hero, he also smooths out what might have been some awkward moments for modern moviegoers. That is, if Sam Jackson, one of the coolest characters on or off screen, is buying that Tarzan can communicate with animals and perform all the amazing physical feats that he does, then you as an audience member are likely to believe it as well.
Christoph Waltz is fantastically devious as Leon Rom, another real-life character blended into this fictional tale. Rom was one of the leaders involved in the Leopold atrocities against the indigenous people of the Congo Free State. And from what I’ve read about the real man/monster, the character in this film is Rom-lite (but then it is just a PG-13 movie.)
The Legend of TarzanThere are bound to be some political correctness police out there who will complain about the “white savior” aspects of this film, but even the harshest cynic will have to agree that this film does an even handed job of depicting the evils of European colonialism in the Victorian era, and even with the movie’s alternative take on history it brings attention to the real horrors that Belgium’s King Leopold brought to the African continent under the false guise of humanitarian philanthropy.
I am thrilled with this film, but I have to mention one awkward section in the third act when it seemed to me that the editor(s) might have been asleep at the wheel. Between a Rom battle with the great apes and the confrontation with Chief Mbonga at the entrance of Opar (yes, Burroughs fans, Opar plays a part in this story) there is not much transition happening here outside of Tarzan running quickly from one place to the other – a clunky moment to be sure, but a minor complaint in the big picture.
There are some huge and ultra-exciting action sequences in this movie, but what I loved most were its more subtle touches, some that might even go unnoticed by some moviegoers, like an almost imperceptible bull-ape grunt that Lord Greystoke makes when he is alone after committing to the mission with Williams. So-damn-perfect!
I’ve prophesied for some time that The Legend of Tarzan would be the date movie of this summer, and having now seen the movie I boldly stand by that prediction. Skarsgard and Robbie as Tarzan and Jane are characters you will either want to be or to be with (no matter what your sexual orientation.) This film has everything you could possibly want for a great time at the movies. Grade: 9/10

Photos © 2016 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

http://nerdvanamedia.com/movies/review-legend-of-tarzan/112550/
 
^Thanks, ladies.:smile:

From ASN:

New interview and photo shoot! Alex is featured in the June 30, 2016 edition (issue # 275) of The Journal, an online weekly magazine for MrPorter.com.

MR ALEXANDER SKARSGÅRD: HOLLYWOOD’S NEW HERO

The 6ft 4in Swede on taking on Tarzan, football and how he got an eight-pack


Photography by Mr Bjorn Iooss

Styling by Mr Allan Kennedy

Words by Mr Dan Rookwood, US Editor, MR PORTER

Mr Alexander Skarsgård stands on the rooftop of a Manhattan skyscraper, looks out onto the urban jungle below and thumps his chest. For a moment, it looks like the man who plays Tarzan might be about to let out the mythical character’s signature call of the wild. Turns out he’s just trying to clear a chesty cough. “Sorry, bad cold,” he croaks. The day before this interview, Mr Skarsgård had flown to LA and back within 24 hours – hence picking up the man-flu.

From up here, the 6ft 4in, 39-year-old Swede can just about see the East Village, where he lives with his girlfriend, Ms Alexa Chung, the British model and It girl. After today’s shoot, he is due to accompany Ms Chung to the CFDA Awards, a gala night on New York’s fashion calendar. In the morning, he’s off to Tokyo for a Tarzan premiere and then, if he can swing it, he’ll fly to France to see Sweden’s football team play in the European Championships.

Such is the life of a leading man. In The Legend of Tarzan, Mr Skarsgård heads up an all-star cast, with Ms Margot Robbie as an anything-but-plain Jane, Mr Samuel L Jackson as Tarzan’s unlikely sidekick and Mr Christoph Waltz doing a wonderful turn as the villain of the piece. The story begins with Mr Skarsgård playing John Clayton, Third Viscount Greystoke, living a humdrum aristocratic life in England with his wife Jane. Things take a decidedly less-genteel turn when they’re called back to the jungles of Africa, where he was raised by gorillas as a feral child called Tarzan.

Mr Skarsgård’s own childhood was wild in a rather different way. He was brought up on the island of Södermalm, a free-thinking community of artists and writers in southern Stockholm, the eldest of six children – five boys and one girl. “It was an incredible childhood, it really was. No one ever locked the doors. We didn’t even have keys,” he recalls. “My cousins were in the apartment above us, so the kids would just run up and down. And Grandma and Grandpa lived across the street.”

Mr Alexander Skarsgård’s father, Mr Stellan Skarsgård, 65, is Sweden’s most famous and best-loved actor who has appeared in Thor, Good Will Hunting, Mamma Mia! and The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo among many others. The legend of Stellan is an entertaining one. By all accounts, his liberal approach to life extended to his wardrobe. He often walked around the house naked despite the presence of guests, which may or may not explain his eldest son’s relaxed attitude towards nudity. (Mr Alexander Skarsgård famously went full frontal in the season six finale of True Blood.)

“My dad is a very social guy. He loves to cook. We always ate together as a family every night,” says Mr Skarsgård. Even after his parents divorced and his father married someone much younger with whom he has two more sons (that’s seven sons and one daughter – are you keeping up?), they remained best friends. So much so that they still dine together as a large and loud extended family most evenings and even bought holiday homes 200 yards away from each other. “It’s very unusual. I’m very aware of that and how lucky we are,” says Mr Skarsgård. “Almost all my siblings live within a four-block radius and every night my dad will cook for whoever swings by. There’s a big dinner party almost every night of the week.”

As a child, young Mr Alexander Skarsgård did some bit-part acting here and there before, at 13, landing a lead role in Swedish TV production Hunden Som Log (The Dog That Smiled), which made him abruptly famous. Uncomfortable with the recognition and the attention, he decided he didn’t want to act anymore – a decision his father supported. “Dad basically said: ‘Well, if you’re not feeling it, don’t do it. Go do other things, have fun, enjoy your life’,” says Mr Skarsgård. “I’m very grateful for that because if he had pushed me, I don’t think I’d be an actor today. I needed a break from it in my teenage years.”

Mr Skarsgård spent those teenage years doing typical teenage things like getting drunk, listening to punk and following his beloved football team Hammarby home and away. Then, at the age of 19, he surprised everyone by announcing he wanted to do his national service.

“I grew up in a very Bohemian hippy-dippy environment,” he says. His entire family are artists and pacifists – wine-drinking, pot-smoking people who hate the idea of the military. “Maybe, age 19, [signing up] was a reaction to that.” Not that he had any intention of seeing active service. “I wasn’t going to get sent to a war zone. In Sweden, our last war was 200 years ago, so it was more of a personal challenge. Obviously if you enlist here in the States, it’s a different conversation.”

Mr Skarsgård isn’t afraid to get out of his comfort zone. After 15 months with the Swedish marines, his next immersive educational experience was to study in England – and at random he picked Leeds, “a tough working-class town”. Why Leeds? “Well, my buddy and I wanted the full British experience. We thought, ‘If we go to London, we’ll just hang out with all our Swedish friends there’. So we looked at a map and I saw Leeds. I didn’t know anything about the city at all apart from Leeds United.” He still supports the team, despite their demise in recent years from the heady Champions League days in 2000-2001.

Eventually, perhaps inevitably, Mr Skarsgård returned to acting. Despite their father not putting any pressure on his children to follow his lead, Messrs Gustaf, Bill and Valter Skarsgård have become actors alongside their brother; it’s clearly in the genes.

Mr Skarsgård’s breakout role was a memorable cameo as a ditzy male model in Zoolander (“Earth to Meekus”). But it was his military training that helped get him his big break as the lead in Generation Kill, an HBO mini-series about the Iraq war. And straight after that, he landed his best known part, that of Eric Northman, a 1,000-year-old bar owner in HBO’s cult vampire series True Blood, which ran for seven hugely successful series from 2008 to 2014.

Although Mr Skarsgård has deliberately tried to avoid being typecast, there is a common theme to most of his roles: he normally has to get his kit off. So, with one full-frontal under his belt, he’s pretty comfortable without any clothes on, then? “Yes,” he concedes. “Although obviously you don’t want it to feel gratuitous.”

In The Legend of Tarzan, Mr Skarsgård spends most of the film running and swinging and grappling without his shirt on. Warner Bros offered to pair him with one of their trainers to get him in shape, but he asked to work instead with his friend Mr Magnus Lygdbäck, a trainer-nutritionist and fellow Swede whom he’d got to know socially while living in LA. “When you have to see the same person every morning at 4.30am, it’s important you get on well with them,” says Mr Skarsgård. Naturally lean of frame, he spent three months bulking up, adding 25lb (more than 11kg) by eating “an insane” 7,000 calories a day (three times his usual intake) and lifting heavy weights. Once he got to the green screens of Warner Bros’ Studios in Leavesden, just outside London, for eight weeks of preparation followed by four months of filming, he embarked on a very strict sugar-, gluten-, wheat-, dairy- and alcohol-free diet of six smaller meals per day alongside his twice-daily training sessions in order to chisel his eight-pack.

Although he hates dieting, Mr Skarsgård loves an intense physical challenge. In 2014, he trekked to South Pole with Prince Harry to raise money for charity. “He’s an incredible storyteller, so I think he’d be a very good actor,” says Mr Skarsgård of the prince. He also spent three weeks at sea a couple of years back, sailing across the Atlantic. So is he more at home in the wild than in the urban jungle? “I’m definitely a city guy, but I love the contrast, to get away for a complete break, with no phone,” he says. “That recharges my batteries.”

Depending on the success of this Tarzan reboot, he may have to get back into the roped-vine swing of things again soon. He has signed a three-movie deal and it doesn’t give too much away to say that everything is set up for a sequel, with Tarzan and Jane living back in the jungle with a new loincloth-diaper-clad arrival.

Having grown up in such a large and close family himself, is Mr Skarsgård planning one of his own? “Yeah. I’m not married, I don’t have kids,” he says, a little ruefully, and then tails off. He turns 40 in August, and would be forgiven some introspection at the imminence of such a landmark. “I feel OK about it,” he shrugs. “No midlife crisis yet.”

The Legend of Tarzan is released on 1 July in the US and 6 July in the UK

http://www.mrporter.com/journal/the-look/mr-alexander-skarsgrd-hollywoods-new-hero/1033

alex-mp-1.jpg alex-mp-2.jpg alex-mp-3.jpg alex-mp-4.jpg alex-mp-5.jpg alex-mp-6.jpg alex-mp-7.jpg
 
Thanks everyone for pic and reviews. I usually take reviews with a grain of salt cause I want to make my own opinion. But as you said, they seem to be like all over the place so hard th know if it's really good or that bad. Going to see it when it's release in Sweden.

Those last pic from rooftop are really gorgeous.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using PurseForum mobile app
 
^yw!

Behind-the-scenes pics from the shoot:

13534548_1186651948033398_1444413851_n.jpg


On location in New York with the king of the urban jungle Alexander Skarsgård, aka Tarzan (in a #BillCunningham-esque blue jacket). Click the link in my profile to read the interview. @mrporterlive @bjorniooss @jacopomaria #alexanderskarsgard #tarzan #mrporter

-danrookwood instagram

13562012_247441842303602_1853851915_n.jpg


Guess who? A special Swede features on #TheJournal today. Hint: he may be into vampires
blank.gif
#staytuned#NYC#MRPORTERontheroad

-mrporterlive instagram
 
From ASN:

Another new interview & photo shoot! Alex was interviewed by Amy Kaufman and photographed by Kirk McKoy for The LA Times.

Alexander Skarsgard tries to update Tarzan’s legend — and impress Dad. No pressure.

As a boy, Alexander Skarsgard thought Tarzan was the ultimate superhero. Sure, the king of the jungle couldn’t shoot spiderwebs from his wrists or laser beams from his eyes. But he didn’t need special mutations or gadgets. He was willing to take on any beast or man, equipped only with his biceps.

Alex and his father, the actor Stellan Skarsgard, would spend hours watching old black-and-white Tarzan movies together when he was little. They were meaningful to Stellan, who’d grown up watching the films starring Johnny Weissmuller at Saturday matinees in Sweden. So when, just shy of 40 years old, Alex was offered the chance to play the character in a big-budget adaptation, he knew he had to do it. He had to make his dad proud.

But his father’s reaction to the news was, uh, a tad surprising/not entirely supportive.

“I laughed,” recalled Stellan, 65, calling from his native country. “And he laughed too. It was not meaningful at all. It was extremely comic. I can’t explain my kid being Johnny Weissmuller. But I’m sure it’s great. He’s a much better actor than Johnny Weissmuller.”

The fact that the younger Skarsgard has yet to convince his own dad that he’s the right guy to play the iconic character gives you a sense of the kind of expectations he is up against at the box office this weekend. “The Legend of Tarzan,” which hit theaters Friday, marks director David Yates’ attempt to modernize Edgar Rice Burroughs’ jungle hero. Before his death in 1950, Burroughs wrote more than two dozen Tarzan stories, which were then adapted for the big screen numerous times – the most memorable being 1932’s “Tarzan the Ape Man” and 1984’s “Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes.”

For the 39-year-old Skarsgard, who’s best known for his work on HBO’s “True Blood” and in independent films like Lars Von Trier’s “Melancholia,” “Tarzan” serves as a test of his strength as a leading man. For years, Hollywood has struggled to find a young male action hero as popular as Arnold Schwarzenegger or Bruce Willis. Colin Farrell tried and failed. So did Jake Gyllenhaal. Same with Taylor Kitsch.

Not that Skarsgard will cop to wanting to be a movie star, anyway. When it comes to discussing his career ambitions in interviews, Skarsgard gives those frustratingly diplomatic actor answers: He wants to take on any project that will challenge him. His choices are based on the quality of the material and the reputation of the filmmaker. He relies on his gut.

“I don’t really have a three-year plan or a five-year plan,” said the actor, who in the last year has appeared in both the critically acclaimed Sundance hit “The Diary of a Teenage Girl” and the underwhelming “Zoolander 2.” “I don’t know what’s next, and that’s what I find quite exciting. I dig it.”

It was a Saturday in early June and Skarsgard had flown in from his home in New York City for the day to shoot promos for “Big Little Lies,” an upcoming seven-episode miniseries on HBO. He was sitting outside a Culver City soundstage by craft services, still dressed in costume – a crisp-collared shirt, tailored slacks – as costars Reese Witherspoon and Laura Dern took off in chauffeured cars.

Skarsgard’s first major Hollywood role was in a different HBO miniseries, the Persian Gulf War tale “Generation Kill.” He first came to Los Angeles nearly two decades ago, after an 18-month stint in the Swedish military. His enrollment in the national service was somewhat of a rebellion against his upbringing in Södermalm, a trendy part of Stockholm he likens to London’s Soho.

“I grew up in a very urban, bohemian family where everyone was a hippie or a pacifist,” the actor recalled, removing the wedding ring he was wearing as part of his costume. “It was artistically and intellectually stimulating, but they were definitely not into outdoor sports or activities. We never went up skiing in the mountains on Easter.”

So at 19 he joined the navy, helping to secure some of the 40,000 islands surrounding the Swedish coast. The country’s last war was more than 2,000 years ago – it remained neutral during WWII – so he knew he wouldn’t be dropped into gun-heavy combat. He just wanted a real challenge – and that’s exactly what he got, according to his father.

“I was invited to come out and see him,” remembered the elder Skarsgard. “But when I got to where he was supposed to be, there was no one there. He was under a couple of bushes in wet snow. He had been lying there for three days without talking.”

It was brutal, but it opened his eyes to adventure. Since, he’s skiied to the South Pole for charity with a team of wounded veterans and Prince Harry. In fact, that was where he was when he found out he got “Tarzan”: a remote Russian base on the coast of Antarctica.

“I’d done my screen test and then left for this monthlong expedition,” said Skarsgard. “When it was over, we returned to this shipping container with a computer from the ’80s and super-slow dial-up internet. And I had an email from David saying Warner Bros. liked what they saw and, ‘I think we’re gonna do this next summer.’”

According to the director, the studio “would have been very happy with a complete unknown,” given Tarzan’s name recognition. “But I always really fancied Alex for the role very early on in the process,” said Yates. “I wanted to find someone who had a real grace and presence and sense of otherness. He’s a very vertical actor with great length and shape. I wanted to get away from that he-man, squared look with the big, strapping leading man.”

Still, after celebrating the news with the prince that night, Skarsgård knew he had to get in shape. The 6-foot-4 actor cut out gluten, sugar, dairy and alcohol. For three months, he ate 6,000 calories a day and lifted weights. Once he’d gained enough body mass, he moved to a stricter diet to keep the muscle but get rid of the fat. Ultimately, he put on 25 pounds of muscle.

In “The Legend of Tarzan,” we find the character eight years removed from the jungle, living in an austere British castle as Lord Greystoke. He’s abandoned vine-swinging for tea-sipping until he’s called to return to the Congo as a trade emissary. He and Jane, played by Margot Robbie, return to Africa only to find its people and wildlife ravaged by colonialism and pressed into slavery by the sinister Leon Rom, played by Christoph Waltz.

Though he was unable to visit the African jungle before filming got underway, Skarsgard did spend time with some wild animals – lions in California, gorillas in England – to observe their movement. He binged David Attenborough nature documentaries. He started working with a choreographer to figure out how a character raised by gorillas would walk. And he thought a lot about human nature – the animalistic urges we all fight to keep at bay in the modern world.

“We are civilized human beings, but we’re all animals deep down, and that creates a certain friction in all of us,” he said. “When you’re in the public eye, we all feel like we’re constantly observed, so we don’t let things out. Anger, sadness, happiness – when does that come out? Maybe when you’re in traffic, because you’re in the safety of your little metallic bubble.”

As if on cue, a driver in a town car idling nearby summoned Skarsgard – it was time for him to depart for the airport. The actor apologized profusely for cutting the interview short and said he would call from the car.

Five minutes later, he rang. He was heading back to New York and then off to Tokyo, where he would embark on the worldwide press tour for the movie. He said he wasn’t nervous about the global unveiling – except for a screening in Stockholm, where his friends and family would see the movie for the first time.

“I just want my dad to like it,” he sighed.

Days before that screening, Stellan Skarsgard – who is regarded in Sweden as a George Clooney, of sorts – said he was looking forward to seeing his son portray his idol.

“It’s very impressive,” he said, “but fame is such a silly thing. It’s so short. It’s the solidity of his work that is more important. He’s done so many good roles in small, independent films. And it’s the body of his work that is the great thing – and the thing that will also give him a much longer career than Johnny Weissmuller.”

alex-latimes-1.jpg

alex-latimes-2.jpg

Source: LATimes.com

http://www.latimes.com/entertainmen...er-skarsgard-profile-20160621-snap-story.html

+

Another pic:

Will @legendoftarzan turn #AlexanderSkarsgard into a movie star? Does he want to be one? http://fw.to/E6Ojx4

CmN3beeUgAEM8m0.jpg


https://twitter.com/latimesent/status/748573311936786433
 
Last edited:
I think that's a defensive attitude to think people are only seeking out negative reviews. There's reviews from audience members as well that say similar things and the reviews posted are from industry heavyweights not JoeBlog.

This isn't an anti-Alex thing. It's a movie review thing.

I want this film to do well (and it could still pull $$$$) and thought it might get better reviews. But that's just not the case.

ETA: @BuckeyeChicago I love Van Helsing and it got really sh*tty reviews.....LOL

Who's defensive? I was just asking is searching and posting negative reviews just an Askars routine and why is Alex thread always flooded with negative reviews by the same people who follow Alex's countrymen, castmates or siblings. That happened with Straw Dogs and Battleship as well. Sometimes I feel like some people are gloating at bad press and reviews. I wouldn't use a word "anti-alex" but now when you brought it on, it really makes me wonder what's going on :confused1:

And why I asked? Well because this seems to happen just on Askars threads. For example Robocop got plenty of criticism at the time but none of the bad reviews ended up to the Joel's thread. The Huntsman got some bad feedback as well but no one bothered to post bad reviews to Charlize's or Chris Hemsworth's threads.

So, if it was just about reviews you would think you'll find mixed reviews posted on the other threads too? :cool:

Thank you for the new photos and article Santress. They are amazing:heart: I need to figure out how to post on the new forum. Next time I may come bearing gifts :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedTopsy
The review I posted above is from the Tarzan Files. He went to the premiere with ERB's family. He knows what should be in a Tarzan film that is true to it's source material. I think the problem with most of the other reviews is that they don't really know the source material. They think the movie should be a campy, silly movie without much depth. I'm so confused by the reviews. They are all over the board. Some say too much origin story, some say not enough. Some say the CGI is awful, others say it's incredible. Some like Margot, some say she's missed cast. Christoph is the perfect Villian or his performance is tired. SLJ is just playing himself, SLJ is the comic relief and the bright spot. Alex is stiff with no emotion, Alex is brilliant and embodies the spirit of Tarzan. There is no chemistry between Tarzan and Jane. The chemistry is off the charts insane. There is no real majority on a reason why they don't like the film. I think too many had preconceived ideas on what they thought it should be or not be and that it's not meeting those ideas is what's upsetting them. Also I find that the entertainment world is getting way too politically correct. I've heard stand up comedians say this. Many no longer want to tour college campuses because of it. No one can address any subject that might make someone else feel uncomfortable. Well if it's never mentioned or shown, how do you get people to have a dialogue that creates understanding, knowledge and compassion for what other cultures have experienced.

I'm going to see it Saturday. I can't wait and I'm sure that we'll continue to get many positive feedbacks from movie goers.

True enough, audiences are very PC - but you can hardly blame them in a climate where Scarlett Johannssen gets cast in an iconic Japanese role, that awful film Gods of Egypt gets cast with all-white actors, they try to pass Emma Stone off as part Hawaiian/part Japanese in Aloha and Daniel Craig has just been cast as the protagonist in a film with Halle Berry about the LA Riots.

I digress but there's no doubting the original ERB books had a fair amount of "better than thou" attitude when it came to indigenous populations and with the obvious wrong of that, people's first hurdle of a film like Tarzan has to be to overcome what could look like from the outside a white-saviour film, even though the film itself is sensitive to that and changes the angle. And I totally get that, and it's not irrelevant.

However the same could be said for the Indiana Jones films and people really love those. It's an adventure re-telling of an unfortunate time in history for many indigenous people.

I don't doubt that they've handled it well. For me, it's more a concern regarding commentary on the CGI and the actors.

And like I said - I'm still going to watch it.

The 'too PC' complaints, and not just for LOT: I think the original reason for so-call political correctness has been forgotten, I'll let Neil Gaiman say it:
"I was reading a book (about interjections, oddly enough) yesterday which included the phrase 'In these days of political correctness…' talking about no longer making jokes that denigrated people for their culture or for the colour of their skin. And I thought, 'That’s not actually anything to do with "political correctness". That’s just treating other people with respect.'Which made me oddly happy. I started imagining a world in which we replaced the phrase 'politically correct' wherever we could with 'treating other people with respect', and it made me smile."
http://www.upworthy.com/what-political-correctness-does-and-doesnt-mean
So while there is some hypersensitivity, particular on college campuses, a lot of complaints I see about things being too PC are from people who are annoyed that it's harder for them to openly racist, sexist, etc., and they don't like it.
And there is a place for being out there and saying those things and pushing the boundaries, and I think most audience can tell what the intent is for it, is the intent malevolent, or to make you think? Or laugh at it? War On Everyone apparently insults pretty much every, and yet in the reviews I've read it's not as offensive as it could be because the intent, in the end, isn't really to cause harm. Or to be totally clueless.
I just read the synopsis for the Daniel Craig movie, oh boy, talk about being totally clueless. And I don't think the people behind the movie really understand why people are upset with this
I think with regards to LOT they were very aware of this, and we've mentioned this before, they were going to have a fine line to walk in being sensitive the issues of the White Savior trope, the slavery, etc. For some it's worked, and for others it's too much.

That is too bad about the reviews. I did not expect them to be great but I'll admit I had concerns about the plot too (which seems to be the main complaint aside from the CGI). It still basically seems to be (from the trailers) a Tarzan saves Jane plot despite Jane not being a damsel in distress. We'll see how it does at the box office - 98% wanting to see it is encouraging. Maybe it will find its place despite the poor reviews. It could still be an enjoyable popcorn film.

HQs of Alex arriving at LAX today (June 29, 2016):



Source: AlexanderSkarsgardOnline Tumblr
Thanks for the new pics, it's weird seeing him in pants with an elastic waist, and he's wearing brown loafers. He actually looks like he's dressed for comfort on this flight.
As for the reactions to Jane: she's a DID, she's not a DID. For the reviewers who didn't like that she was a damsel, I wonder what they think of Indiana Jones' Marion Ravenwood, who was feisty, and who also spent a good portion of the first movie as the kidnappee of Belloq.
^Thanks, ladies.:smile:

From ASN:

New interview and photo shoot! Alex is featured in the June 30, 2016 edition (issue # 275) of The Journal, an online weekly magazine for MrPorter.com.

MR ALEXANDER SKARSGÅRD: HOLLYWOOD’S NEW HERO

The 6ft 4in Swede on taking on Tarzan, football and how he got an eight-pack


Photography by Mr Bjorn Iooss

Styling by Mr Allan Kennedy

Words by Mr Dan Rookwood, US Editor, MR PORTER

Mr Alexander Skarsgård stands on the rooftop of a Manhattan skyscraper, looks out onto the urban jungle below and thumps his chest. For a moment, it looks like the man who plays Tarzan might be about to let out the mythical character’s signature call of the wild. Turns out he’s just trying to clear a chesty cough. “Sorry, bad cold,” he croaks. The day before this interview, Mr Skarsgård had flown to LA and back within 24 hours – hence picking up the man-flu.

From up here, the 6ft 4in, 39-year-old Swede can just about see the East Village, where he lives with his girlfriend, Ms Alexa Chung, the British model and It girl. After today’s shoot, he is due to accompany Ms Chung to the CFDA Awards, a gala night on New York’s fashion calendar. In the morning, he’s off to Tokyo for a Tarzan premiere and then, if he can swing it, he’ll fly to France to see Sweden’s football team play in the European Championships.

Such is the life of a leading man. In The Legend of Tarzan, Mr Skarsgård heads up an all-star cast, with Ms Margot Robbie as an anything-but-plain Jane, Mr Samuel L Jackson as Tarzan’s unlikely sidekick and Mr Christoph Waltz doing a wonderful turn as the villain of the piece. The story begins with Mr Skarsgård playing John Clayton, Third Viscount Greystoke, living a humdrum aristocratic life in England with his wife Jane. Things take a decidedly less-genteel turn when they’re called back to the jungles of Africa, where he was raised by gorillas as a feral child called Tarzan.

Mr Skarsgård’s own childhood was wild in a rather different way. He was brought up on the island of Södermalm, a free-thinking community of artists and writers in southern Stockholm, the eldest of six children – five boys and one girl. “It was an incredible childhood, it really was. No one ever locked the doors. We didn’t even have keys,” he recalls. “My cousins were in the apartment above us, so the kids would just run up and down. And Grandma and Grandpa lived across the street.”

Mr Alexander Skarsgård’s father, Mr Stellan Skarsgård, 65, is Sweden’s most famous and best-loved actor who has appeared in Thor, Good Will Hunting, Mamma Mia! and The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo among many others. The legend of Stellan is an entertaining one. By all accounts, his liberal approach to life extended to his wardrobe. He often walked around the house naked despite the presence of guests, which may or may not explain his eldest son’s relaxed attitude towards nudity. (Mr Alexander Skarsgård famously went full frontal in the season six finale of True Blood.)

“My dad is a very social guy. He loves to cook. We always ate together as a family every night,” says Mr Skarsgård. Even after his parents divorced and his father married someone much younger with whom he has two more sons (that’s seven sons and one daughter – are you keeping up?), they remained best friends. So much so that they still dine together as a large and loud extended family most evenings and even bought holiday homes 200 yards away from each other. “It’s very unusual. I’m very aware of that and how lucky we are,” says Mr Skarsgård. “Almost all my siblings live within a four-block radius and every night my dad will cook for whoever swings by. There’s a big dinner party almost every night of the week.”

As a child, young Mr Alexander Skarsgård did some bit-part acting here and there before, at 13, landing a lead role in Swedish TV production Hunden Som Log (The Dog That Smiled), which made him abruptly famous. Uncomfortable with the recognition and the attention, he decided he didn’t want to act anymore – a decision his father supported. “Dad basically said: ‘Well, if you’re not feeling it, don’t do it. Go do other things, have fun, enjoy your life’,” says Mr Skarsgård. “I’m very grateful for that because if he had pushed me, I don’t think I’d be an actor today. I needed a break from it in my teenage years.”

Mr Skarsgård spent those teenage years doing typical teenage things like getting drunk, listening to punk and following his beloved football team Hammarby home and away. Then, at the age of 19, he surprised everyone by announcing he wanted to do his national service.

“I grew up in a very Bohemian hippy-dippy environment,” he says. His entire family are artists and pacifists – wine-drinking, pot-smoking people who hate the idea of the military. “Maybe, age 19, [signing up] was a reaction to that.” Not that he had any intention of seeing active service. “I wasn’t going to get sent to a war zone. In Sweden, our last war was 200 years ago, so it was more of a personal challenge. Obviously if you enlist here in the States, it’s a different conversation.”

Mr Skarsgård isn’t afraid to get out of his comfort zone. After 15 months with the Swedish marines, his next immersive educational experience was to study in England – and at random he picked Leeds, “a tough working-class town”. Why Leeds? “Well, my buddy and I wanted the full British experience. We thought, ‘If we go to London, we’ll just hang out with all our Swedish friends there’. So we looked at a map and I saw Leeds. I didn’t know anything about the city at all apart from Leeds United.” He still supports the team, despite their demise in recent years from the heady Champions League days in 2000-2001.

Eventually, perhaps inevitably, Mr Skarsgård returned to acting. Despite their father not putting any pressure on his children to follow his lead, Messrs Gustaf, Bill and Valter Skarsgård have become actors alongside their brother; it’s clearly in the genes.

Mr Skarsgård’s breakout role was a memorable cameo as a ditzy male model in Zoolander (“Earth to Meekus”). But it was his military training that helped get him his big break as the lead in Generation Kill, an HBO mini-series about the Iraq war. And straight after that, he landed his best known part, that of Eric Northman, a 1,000-year-old bar owner in HBO’s cult vampire series True Blood, which ran for seven hugely successful series from 2008 to 2014.

Although Mr Skarsgård has deliberately tried to avoid being typecast, there is a common theme to most of his roles: he normally has to get his kit off. So, with one full-frontal under his belt, he’s pretty comfortable without any clothes on, then? “Yes,” he concedes. “Although obviously you don’t want it to feel gratuitous.”

In The Legend of Tarzan, Mr Skarsgård spends most of the film running and swinging and grappling without his shirt on. Warner Bros offered to pair him with one of their trainers to get him in shape, but he asked to work instead with his friend Mr Magnus Lygdbäck, a trainer-nutritionist and fellow Swede whom he’d got to know socially while living in LA. “When you have to see the same person every morning at 4.30am, it’s important you get on well with them,” says Mr Skarsgård. Naturally lean of frame, he spent three months bulking up, adding 25lb (more than 11kg) by eating “an insane” 7,000 calories a day (three times his usual intake) and lifting heavy weights. Once he got to the green screens of Warner Bros’ Studios in Leavesden, just outside London, for eight weeks of preparation followed by four months of filming, he embarked on a very strict sugar-, gluten-, wheat-, dairy- and alcohol-free diet of six smaller meals per day alongside his twice-daily training sessions in order to chisel his eight-pack.

Although he hates dieting, Mr Skarsgård loves an intense physical challenge. In 2014, he trekked to South Pole with Prince Harry to raise money for charity. “He’s an incredible storyteller, so I think he’d be a very good actor,” says Mr Skarsgård of the prince. He also spent three weeks at sea a couple of years back, sailing across the Atlantic. So is he more at home in the wild than in the urban jungle? “I’m definitely a city guy, but I love the contrast, to get away for a complete break, with no phone,” he says. “That recharges my batteries.”

Depending on the success of this Tarzan reboot, he may have to get back into the roped-vine swing of things again soon. He has signed a three-movie deal and it doesn’t give too much away to say that everything is set up for a sequel, with Tarzan and Jane living back in the jungle with a new loincloth-diaper-clad arrival.

Having grown up in such a large and close family himself, is Mr Skarsgård planning one of his own? “Yeah. I’m not married, I don’t have kids,” he says, a little ruefully, and then tails off. He turns 40 in August, and would be forgiven some introspection at the imminence of such a landmark. “I feel OK about it,” he shrugs. “No midlife crisis yet.”

The Legend of Tarzan is released on 1 July in the US and 6 July in the UK

http://www.mrporter.com/journal/the-look/mr-alexander-skarsgrd-hollywoods-new-hero/1033

View attachment 3395769 View attachment 3395770 View attachment 3395771 View attachment 3395772 View attachment 3395773 View attachment 3395774
/QUOTE]

Nice photo shoot and interview!

That's a very nice photoshoot and interview.
 
Last edited:
This is very thoughtful review from the New York TImes:
Review: A ‘Tarzan’ With a Few Twists in the Hollywood Vine
“The Legend of Tarzan” has a whole lot of fun, big-screen things going for it — adventure, romance, natural landscapes, digital animals and oceans of rippling handsome man-muscle. Its sweep and easy pleasures come from its old-fashioned escapades — it’s one long dash through the jungle by foot, train, boat and swinging vine — but what makes it more enjoyable than other recycled stories of this type is that the filmmakers have given Tarzan a thoughtful, imperfect makeover. That must have been tough given the origin story’s white supremacy problems.

Tarzan has always had bad optics — white hero, black land — to state the excessively obvious. Probably the only real way to avoid his negative image would be to let him molder on the shelf and in our cultural memory. Except that this wild child raised by apes turned wild man forever caught between civilization and nature is a great mythic character — a rich, dense tangle of narrative, philosophical and political meanings. That partly explains why he’s been such a commercially reliable property since Edgar Rice Burroughs cut him loose in 1912, the year Tarzan roared into existence in a pulp magazine that evolved into an empire of books, comics, plays and films.

The image of Alexander Skarsgard crashing bare-chested through the jungle as the latest big-screen Tarzan, his long hair and diamond-cut muscles gently fluttering, gets at another aspect of this character’s attraction. Like a lot of Tarzan stories, this one teems with striking flora and fauna, much of it skillfully computer generated, some of it captured on location in green, green Gabon. But its most special and spectacular effect is Tarzan, one of those characters who have always complicated the familiar argument that visual pleasure in Hollywood cinema is hinged on women being objects of male desire. Johnny Weissmuller, the most famous screen Tarzan, was an exemplary fetishized object of desire.

The casting of Mr. Skarsgard, who spent a lot of time baring his body, along with vampire fangs, on the HBO show “True Blood,” indicates that the filmmakers understand a primal part of Tarzan’s allure. This isn’t strictly a question of Mr. Skarsgard’s considerable physical charms, though these are central to the character. (He isn’t playing nerd boy of the jungle.) Mr. Skarsgard is also a fine actor with an enigmatic melancholy, a quality that has been put to expressive use in small roles in movies like “What Maisie Knew” and that here suggests Tarzan carries a profound burden that makes him more complex than the usual beefcake in loincloth.

And Tarzan needs a burden, something heavy enough to justify the exhumation of such a difficult fantasy figure. He gets one by proxy in “The Legend of Tarzan,” which opens with some historically informed text about King Leopold II of Belgium (1835-1909), known as the butcher of Congo for his role in murdering millions. It’s a grim start to this make-believe, but the mood lifts at Greystoke Manor, Tarzan’s ancestral pad in Britain, where he’s broodily prowling about like a caged animal. Already married to Lady Jane (Margot Robbie, holding her own), Tarzan now goes by John Clayton, having years earlier returned to nominal civilization and its discontents.
Directed by David Yates, from an action-and-incident-packed script by Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer, “The Legend of Tarzan” takes a while to get going. After announcing its grave bona fides, it continues to engage in a lot of narrative throat clearing, much of it dedicated to seeding Burroughs’s foundational story with historical facts. To this end, John receives an invitation from King Leopold to return to Congo to witness the king’s putative good works. John rejects the offer, only to change his mind after an entreaty from an American, George Washington Williams (Samuel L. Jackson), who suspects that the Belgian king is enslaving the region’s people.

Mr. Jackson’s character is very loosely based on an extraordinary real historical hero named George Washington Williams, who occupies a chapter in Adam Hochschild’s magisterial book “King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror and Heroism in Colonial Africa.” Mr. Hochschild writes that Williams, whom he calls “the first heretic,” was the earliest dissenter to speak out “fully and passionately and repeatedly” on Leopold’s atrocities. Williams deserves a grand cinematic adventure of his own, and perhaps Mr. Jackson’s comfortable, affable performance, which like the movie itself oscillates between seriousness and gentle comedy, will help make that case.

Here, though, Williams is basically an elevated sidekick as well as a physician, war veteran and crack shot who’s as proficient at suturing wounds with insects as he is mowing down swaths of white mercenaries. More interesting, especially given how routine colonialist fantasies tend to play out, it is Williams who voices the complexities, catastrophic errors and redemptive efforts of the so-called civilized world, a screen job usually given to white saviors. Williams’s polar opposite is the resident villain, Leon Rom (Christoph Waltz, predictably good), a silky, uncomplicated sadist who embodies rapacious evil from his all-white suit to his crosslike weapon.

Tarzan remains the man apart and the man in the middle, the uneasy, sometimes forlorn, sometimes exuberant bridge between civilization and nature, between the human and nonhuman animal world. His origin story from his cradle to his new mother’s hairy arms is related in flashback patchwork that conveys what he lost when he left the jungle — home, world and identity. And when he at last returns to that home, he has much to do, including nuzzle old furred friends and lead a rescue mission that soon involves Jane along with thousands of Africans. Jane scoffs at the word damsel, but she’s in distress as well as a stand-in for the abused, captive black bodies that the movie shows only glancingly.

Mr. Yates, who directed the last four movies in the “Harry Potter” franchise, slips easily between intimacy and grandiosity, and he scales up and scales down as easily as Tarzan scrambles up and down the digitally rendered trees. If he and his team haven’t reinvented Tarzan it’s because they’re working in an industrial context that still puts a premium on heroic white men, even if this one doesn’t make you wince each time he turns up. Tarzan is still the white avatar flying through the African jungle with eerie skills, a mighty yodel and existential issues, yet the terrain he swings over is messier, closer and less of a lie than it once was.

Part of Tarzan’s appeal — at least to some — is that he inhabits a world that resembles ours, but without the unsettling distractions of real suffering. It’s become trickier for pop entertainments to gloss over historical traumas, which may be why so many modern colonial struggles involve deep space or an alien invasion. Perhaps it’s easier to rewrite history through futuristic fictions, where worlds can collide before everyone moves on. There’s something touching about “The Legend of Tarzan,” which as it struggles to offer old Hollywood-style adventure without old Hollywood-style racism, suggests that perhaps other fantasies are possible — you just need some thought and Mr. Jackson.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/m...eview.html?smid=tw-nytimesarts&smtyp=cur&_r=1
 
Top