I am a single, early 50s, heterosexual, male who often is complemented on my outfits, due not in small part to my participation on styleforum (a mens version of purseforum). I wonder, however, whether the lack of female input is a handicap in dressing to attract women. In particular, women may not agree with styleforum dress codes, since I notice that many well-dressed women on this forum are not bound by these conventions. In particular:
1) Womens accessories often prominently display coach, Gucci, LV, Burberry, and other logos, where as such branding is looked down upon in styleforum. Ive wondered whether women might find a Chanel, Gucci, LV scarf attractive on a man because they would see it as complementary of their own fashion choices.
2) Are shirttails out perceived as sloppy or a carefree attitude?
3) Are Ed Hardy-type shirts attractive?
4) How might even well dressed men do differently that women would appreciate?
Thanks
1) Womens accessories often prominently display coach, Gucci, LV, Burberry, and other logos, where as such branding is looked down upon in styleforum. Ive wondered whether women might find a Chanel, Gucci, LV scarf attractive on a man because they would see it as complementary of their own fashion choices.
2) Are shirttails out perceived as sloppy or a carefree attitude?
3) Are Ed Hardy-type shirts attractive?
4) How might even well dressed men do differently that women would appreciate?
Thanks