I feel so stylish when I carry her, it elevates even the simplest outfitI have the same bag!! :thumbup: isn't it Great?
So, it's me again....
when I look at the onlienshops, I see more chloe Marcie bags in "nut" than in "tan".... what do you think? Is "tan" a colour that actually that is no more as "up to date" than "nut"?? Or, with other words: Will "nut" be the new "tan" regarding the popularity?
I've always been an LV & Gucci girl, but over the last year I've been eyeing the Chloe Marcie bag. I've been more and more attracted to it, yet I kept buying my annual LV & Gucci bags. This last month I've been to Nordstrom's probably 10 times & each time I had to go pick up the Marcie, try it on, stand in the mirror with it on my shoulder & in the crook of my arm. Then it occurs to me that over the years my taste has become more and more conservative, more and more mature, more and more classic. I've gone from the exclusive loud bags, to the iconic LV/Gucci logo bags, to again LV/Gucci no logo bags, to now the Marcie. It's classy and understated and timeless. The leather is like butter & the quality is top notch. Like the previous posts said, you can't go wrong with a Chloe bag. Even though I'm only on my first, it definitely will not be my last. I still love all of my LV's & Gucci bags, they stay in rotation, but now I have a new love. I don't know what took me so long to get one, but I'm soooooo glad I did.
Totally agree with you! I go through phases where I'd whip out my logo bags then put them away to hibernate and opt for my Chloe's and Balenciaga's. Lately I've been buying mostly discreetly pricey bags instead of logo bags because honestly, I feel more comfortable carrying them now (especially in NYC subway cars!).
Women who are "in the know" give me that knowing look when they see my bags but for the most part, I enjoy people liking my bags because they're gorgeous not because they scream out "LV" or "Chanel".
I like Chloe bags for their original design, understated branding and high quality leather.