Ah, right, I didn’t connect the lady who had her recommended status taken away with the previous post about the YSL boots that were stopped at QC, I’d forgotten that. Well that would explain losing the status I guess, things have to conform about 90% of the time to have recommended status, maybe if there were other things sold that also had not conformed it adds up to enough to lose it.
@Geert, I’m sorry you lost the status, I couldn’t tell from looking at the pictures in the thread if there were flaws which maybe could have been mentioned specifically in the description? I don’t rely on meeting the criteria for the condition declared alone; avoiding situations where something like your experience happens is why I always supply so many pictures of every detail, especially potential ‘flaws’, and specify any little ‘flaw’ however small in the description, or even pointing out that some variation is normal and not a flaw. I tend to think of the condition criteria as more of a basic guideline for buyer and seller alike. I suppose if some minor flaw was not mentioned in the description it was only fair to the buyer to offer a small price reduction no matter how low the original price, because she thought she’d paid that price for something without a flaw that may not have been evident in the photos. The QC report
@Geert shared specified ‘snags’ so maybe there was a little snag in the leather which wasn’t specifically mentioned? Just a thought. I think it’s unfortunately just a lesson to any of us sellers to be really thorough and exhaustive in the description and photos so there’s no room for doubt; it’s a shame for
@Geert, though.
I don’t really think I’d interpret it that they were being “nasty”. I’m a bit surprised if people feel it’s like that, really; I’ve never experienced anything like it. Maybe I’ve just been luckier but the worst I’ve ever had is they’ve been a bit formulaic or a bit slow in their response but if I’ve followed up I’ve always got the answer I need or the help I need in the end and I’ve definitely had quicker help recently. They were a bit over-keen in thinking a stitch loose on an insignificant internal seam was a flaw just the one time ages ago, but otherwise it’s been ok, and I’ve sold a
lot. In my case, and both this case with the YSL boots and in the one with your nude shoes they were, I suppose, trying to do their quality control job on behalf of the buyer, even if all three of us might disagree with Vestiaire on the interpretation they made? I mean, that’s in our interest as sellers too, in the end, because it helps people feel confident buying. I think I’d rather they were too strict than too lax, from both points of view.