Wow, you people are amazing. I am learning a lot on this particular thread. Please keep sharing your inspired bags. When I look around, I really do not know of or see any designer that is truly authentic for more than one season before other high end designers start replicating the trend. It is consumers who decide what is "allowable" in their choice of collections. When someone says, "I would never . . . .blah blah blah... " I just have to think, open your eyes and let some light in. There is nothing that is original under the sun. Everything has been inspired by someone or something. I am also reminded on designers video taping city street scenes for days on end to capture what the poor and sometimes homeless people are forced to wear. Then taking those images and redesigning them for the runway. I think collectors already know this as they walk into a high end collection.
I live in a town where every third male is a car collector. I know many males who collect cars. Numerous tenants in my building rent extra underground parking spaces just to store their collections. I never hear any car collector disregard a model as a "fake" because it was inspired by an older model. What I do see is even more chatter and camaraderie about differences in quality, but as part of the joy of collecting, not for the snobbery.
The car club analogy is one example of collector etiquette, and there are hundreds of other examples. I think that handbag snobbery is a fabricated "rule" in an effort to remain relevant in a fickle and ever changing market of marketing fashion. Not to mention to justify the purchase itself. It's a built in safety mechanism to preserve the cost and relevance of a product. It's funny that there is no mention on a thread such as this one, how many people who buy collections from a favorite design house how "insane the prices have become" for certain handbags, along with the reduction in actual quality of the product.
Do we think that the kiss lock on a stam is original? Something can only be "original" for a very short period of time on this dimension before the art is swallowed up by influences. It is simple meta-physics. Nothing exists in a bubble, it expands and morphs into further expressions of itself. That is the "law" of life itself. Sure, denounce the inspired market if that is what your club or group think has you to do, but don't insist that others join your group-think to preserve your own egoic tendencies. I can forgive because of ignorance of cosmic patterns, but can't forgive the snobbery for snobbery itself.