The Atlantic: Something Odd Is Happening With Handbags

tulipfield

O.G.
Dec 11, 2007
1,334
1,482
Another banger from Amanda Mull at the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/03/luxury-fashion-handbag-trends/673558/

Something Odd Is Happening With Handbags​

Where do shoppers turn when an industry built on novelty runs out of new ideas?
By Amanda Mull

Nearly half a decade has elapsed since I last worked in the fashion industry, but one thing from my previous career remains a compulsion to this day: I look at people’s purses. In the brain space that might otherwise be occupied by dear childhood memories or the dates and times of future doctor appointments, I tend to an apparently undeletable mental spreadsheet of who is carrying what. Bottega Veneta Cassette, green padded leather, Soho, 20-something woman. Louis Vuitton Pochette Métis, logo canvas, Hoyt-Schermerhorn subway stop, 40-ish woman. For 10 years, these data points informed my obsessive, detailed coverage of the luxury-handbag market. Now they just accumulate. Rarely do I see something I can’t place.

Over the past year or two, though, something largely unprecedented has been happening on people’s shoulders. Old bags are back. A significant—and growing—number of fashion-conscious people appear to be mining the depths of their closets or scouring secondhand marketplaces for designs released in the past decade or so. These women aren’t merely hunting down vintage styles of historical fashion significance, or the timeless classics that a wealthy mom might pass down to her daughter. Instead, many of them are carrying precisely the bags that should be at the nadir of popularity: one-off seasonal releases, designs whose trendiness peaked in the 2010s, and other bags that would otherwise scan as outdated to anyone in the know. One of fashion’s most basic rules is that nothing is less cool than the recent past, yet here are trendy people parading around like it’s 2015.

Signs of wear on these bags are no dealbreaker. As The New York Times recently noted, some Hermès Birkin buyers are now looking for older, broken-in bags in order to cultivate a more relaxed vibe. They’re also a (relative) bargain. Data from the secondhand luxury marketplace The RealReal suggest that this trend extends across the handbag market. Demand for like-new versions of recent releases has eased in favor of older, used designs, including those with obvious imperfections. Sales of designer bags in “fair” condition, which can have scuffed corners or other highly visible markers of use, nearly doubled in 2022.

This shift in consumer desire would be easy to dismiss as a whim of the market—we’re talking about the vagaries of fancy handbags, after all, and fashion is a cyclical business that constantly refers to its own history in new products. Within this shift in demand, though, is a signal that something larger may be afoot. Fashion, as an industry, may have started to butt up against the limits of a buying public that it has pushed to exhaustion. What does it mean when people begin to tire of novelty itself?

Handbags have a unique place in the fashion industry because they are so ludicrously marketable. They’re what you might call a trophy purchase: something easily recognizable to people who have even a passing interest in fashion, which enhances their desirability as potent status markers. (Though as one unfortunate Tinder date learned on the most recent episode of Succession, it is entirely possibleto spend three grand on a purse and signal precisely the wrong status, depending on your audience.) Bags are also more practical than party dresses or high heels, and they avoid the fit issues of clothing. A $3,000 bag is still impossibly expensive for the average person, but it’s something that many, many more people can (and do) mentally justify putting on their credit card than a similarly expensive sweater. As a result, handbags are among the most important financial engines of the luxury sector, with a growing global market worth tens of billions of dollars annually. For many designer brands—and especially those with wide name recognition outside the industry—bags are the business, no matter how many other kinds of products they might produce.

For years, this has been a splendid state of affairs for luxury brands, but things between brands and buyers have lately become a little tense. The first major problem is that prices have skyrocketed. Designer handbags have always been very expensive—that is sort of their defining feature, if we’re all being honest—but according to a 2022 market analysis by Business of Fashion, the average price for a designer handbag in the United States had increased by 27 percent since 2019. For some of the most highly prized bags, the number is even more outrageous—the Chanel Classic Flap bag, for example, saw a price hike of 60 percent in roughly the same period. Those sudden, sharp hikes come after years of smaller, steadier increases, which had already doubled the price of some bags in the space of about a decade.

The second major problem: Even as prices climb, the handbag market has become oversaturated and its products overexposed. Designers are pushed to produce more frequent and larger product releases—the old industry standard was two collections a year, in spring and fall, and now most big brands produce five or six. And brands have become more risk averse when it comes to new design ideas; bags’ centrality to the businesses’ bottom line means there’s vanishingly little patience for designers who create things that are too forward-thinking to catch on instantaneously.

The way these problems were created is largely a story of consolidation—a phenomenon not unique to the fashion industry. Once upon a time, high-end fashion was the province of family-owned businesses that employed skilled artisans in European workshops, piecing together leather goods according to the old methods. Now most major brands are owned by luxury conglomerates that mass-produce much of their inventory, the biggest and most valuable of which are LVMH and Kering. Those two companies oversee almost all the heavy hitters in the accessories industry: Louis Vuitton, Dior, Gucci, Bottega Veneta, Fendi, Celine, Balenciaga, and Saint Laurent, among others.

When a business becomes a subsidiary of a public company, which LVMH and Kering are, some expectations are predictable. Shareholders want profitability and growth, so designers produce more and take fewer risks. To goose sales figures, there’s nothing quite as quick and dirty as simply raising prices, which can have the benefit of making a bag seem all the more exclusive. Although brands offer various rationales for their increases—fluctuations in currency exchange, higher manufacturing prices, supply issues—in my experience, the most common reason for an increase is the belief that the market will bear it.

So far, this belief has panned out. During the pandemic, well-off people in most global fashion markets saved money by taking a year or two off from travel, dining, and other expensive pursuits, and many of them, bored at home and looking for a little stimulation, used the extra cash to buy things like expensive watches and designer handbags. But as consumer markets have begun to normalize, we now have a fire hose of inescapably common, exorbitantly priced handbags that aren’t particularly singular or compelling. There is an unresolvable tension between being told that the thing you’re buying is expensive because it is rare and special and will last a lifetime, and seeing that thing become near-instantly ubiquitous among celebrities, Instagram influencers, and half the girlies at brunch, just to get ditched wholesale a few months later for something newer and shinier, if only slightly different. This tension has always existed, but social media and online shopping have accelerated the trend cycle so much that one of the industry’s best sleights of hand no longer feels quite so magical. At this point, showing people that it still works on you might even feel a little embarrassing.

It’s no wonder that shoppers are summoning the ghosts of handbags past. For a business predicated on moving people efficiently forward to new ideas and new products, fashion seems content to do little more than play the hits right now. Meanwhile, shoppers at all price levels are in thrall to a years-long retro revival, mining resale platforms and thrift stores for things more unique or whimsical than what’s newly available. Designer bags have been part of that trend, particularly those from the It Bag era of the mid-2000s, when Chloé’s Paddington and Silverado bags inspired long waitlists and the Fendi Baguette bag and Hermès Birkin both got their own story lines on Sex and the City. Many of that period’s designs were genuinely interesting attempts to rethink the category’s aesthetic conventions—in other words, precisely the kinds of designs that big brands now generally decline to create, mortgaging their long-term relevance in a bid for short-term financial returns.

You can tell that this phenomenon is more than just an era-specific trend, because growing interest in older bags extends far beyond that time to similarly distinctive pieces from much of the past 20 years, including bags such as the Proenza Schouler PS1 and PS11, which hit their peak popularity in the mid-2010s—much too recently to be retro. Most of these styles are abundantly available on resale websites for a couple hundred bucks, a far cry from the thousands of dollars that the same designers charge for new pieces.

As shoppers have made older bags popular, brands have looked at this phenomenon and learned the wrong lessons. In the past few years, they’ve reissued many of these old designs in an attempt to capture existing nostalgia, but most of the pieces, which were never affordable to begin with, are now far more expensive. And even if the reissued bags help keep sales up for another quarter or two, they’re not a solution for malaise among buyers, who seem to be growing tired of both gimmicky logo-mania and the same old timeless, neutral classics. More than anything, they might be sick of the relentless pressure to keep buying, and to spend ever more money to do little beyond prove that they still can. For fashion customers, there’s something to be gained from the industry’s creative stalemate, even if it’s just the realization that the things you actually want to wear or carry right now might already be in your closet.


Amanda Mull is a staff writer at The Atlantic.
 
Another banger from Amanda Mull at the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/03/luxury-fashion-handbag-trends/673558/

Something Odd Is Happening With Handbags​

Where do shoppers turn when an industry built on novelty runs out of new ideas?
By Amanda Mull

Nearly half a decade has elapsed since I last worked in the fashion industry, but one thing from my previous career remains a compulsion to this day: I look at people’s purses. In the brain space that might otherwise be occupied by dear childhood memories or the dates and times of future doctor appointments, I tend to an apparently undeletable mental spreadsheet of who is carrying what. Bottega Veneta Cassette, green padded leather, Soho, 20-something woman. Louis Vuitton Pochette Métis, logo canvas, Hoyt-Schermerhorn subway stop, 40-ish woman. For 10 years, these data points informed my obsessive, detailed coverage of the luxury-handbag market. Now they just accumulate. Rarely do I see something I can’t place.

Over the past year or two, though, something largely unprecedented has been happening on people’s shoulders. Old bags are back. A significant—and growing—number of fashion-conscious people appear to be mining the depths of their closets or scouring secondhand marketplaces for designs released in the past decade or so. These women aren’t merely hunting down vintage styles of historical fashion significance, or the timeless classics that a wealthy mom might pass down to her daughter. Instead, many of them are carrying precisely the bags that should be at the nadir of popularity: one-off seasonal releases, designs whose trendiness peaked in the 2010s, and other bags that would otherwise scan as outdated to anyone in the know. One of fashion’s most basic rules is that nothing is less cool than the recent past, yet here are trendy people parading around like it’s 2015.

Signs of wear on these bags are no dealbreaker. As The New York Times recently noted, some Hermès Birkin buyers are now looking for older, broken-in bags in order to cultivate a more relaxed vibe. They’re also a (relative) bargain. Data from the secondhand luxury marketplace The RealReal suggest that this trend extends across the handbag market. Demand for like-new versions of recent releases has eased in favor of older, used designs, including those with obvious imperfections. Sales of designer bags in “fair” condition, which can have scuffed corners or other highly visible markers of use, nearly doubled in 2022.

This shift in consumer desire would be easy to dismiss as a whim of the market—we’re talking about the vagaries of fancy handbags, after all, and fashion is a cyclical business that constantly refers to its own history in new products. Within this shift in demand, though, is a signal that something larger may be afoot. Fashion, as an industry, may have started to butt up against the limits of a buying public that it has pushed to exhaustion. What does it mean when people begin to tire of novelty itself?

Handbags have a unique place in the fashion industry because they are so ludicrously marketable. They’re what you might call a trophy purchase: something easily recognizable to people who have even a passing interest in fashion, which enhances their desirability as potent status markers. (Though as one unfortunate Tinder date learned on the most recent episode of Succession, it is entirely possibleto spend three grand on a purse and signal precisely the wrong status, depending on your audience.) Bags are also more practical than party dresses or high heels, and they avoid the fit issues of clothing. A $3,000 bag is still impossibly expensive for the average person, but it’s something that many, many more people can (and do) mentally justify putting on their credit card than a similarly expensive sweater. As a result, handbags are among the most important financial engines of the luxury sector, with a growing global market worth tens of billions of dollars annually. For many designer brands—and especially those with wide name recognition outside the industry—bags are the business, no matter how many other kinds of products they might produce.

For years, this has been a splendid state of affairs for luxury brands, but things between brands and buyers have lately become a little tense. The first major problem is that prices have skyrocketed. Designer handbags have always been very expensive—that is sort of their defining feature, if we’re all being honest—but according to a 2022 market analysis by Business of Fashion, the average price for a designer handbag in the United States had increased by 27 percent since 2019. For some of the most highly prized bags, the number is even more outrageous—the Chanel Classic Flap bag, for example, saw a price hike of 60 percent in roughly the same period. Those sudden, sharp hikes come after years of smaller, steadier increases, which had already doubled the price of some bags in the space of about a decade.

The second major problem: Even as prices climb, the handbag market has become oversaturated and its products overexposed. Designers are pushed to produce more frequent and larger product releases—the old industry standard was two collections a year, in spring and fall, and now most big brands produce five or six. And brands have become more risk averse when it comes to new design ideas; bags’ centrality to the businesses’ bottom line means there’s vanishingly little patience for designers who create things that are too forward-thinking to catch on instantaneously.

The way these problems were created is largely a story of consolidation—a phenomenon not unique to the fashion industry. Once upon a time, high-end fashion was the province of family-owned businesses that employed skilled artisans in European workshops, piecing together leather goods according to the old methods. Now most major brands are owned by luxury conglomerates that mass-produce much of their inventory, the biggest and most valuable of which are LVMH and Kering. Those two companies oversee almost all the heavy hitters in the accessories industry: Louis Vuitton, Dior, Gucci, Bottega Veneta, Fendi, Celine, Balenciaga, and Saint Laurent, among others.

When a business becomes a subsidiary of a public company, which LVMH and Kering are, some expectations are predictable. Shareholders want profitability and growth, so designers produce more and take fewer risks. To goose sales figures, there’s nothing quite as quick and dirty as simply raising prices, which can have the benefit of making a bag seem all the more exclusive. Although brands offer various rationales for their increases—fluctuations in currency exchange, higher manufacturing prices, supply issues—in my experience, the most common reason for an increase is the belief that the market will bear it.

So far, this belief has panned out. During the pandemic, well-off people in most global fashion markets saved money by taking a year or two off from travel, dining, and other expensive pursuits, and many of them, bored at home and looking for a little stimulation, used the extra cash to buy things like expensive watches and designer handbags. But as consumer markets have begun to normalize, we now have a fire hose of inescapably common, exorbitantly priced handbags that aren’t particularly singular or compelling. There is an unresolvable tension between being told that the thing you’re buying is expensive because it is rare and special and will last a lifetime, and seeing that thing become near-instantly ubiquitous among celebrities, Instagram influencers, and half the girlies at brunch, just to get ditched wholesale a few months later for something newer and shinier, if only slightly different. This tension has always existed, but social media and online shopping have accelerated the trend cycle so much that one of the industry’s best sleights of hand no longer feels quite so magical. At this point, showing people that it still works on you might even feel a little embarrassing.

It’s no wonder that shoppers are summoning the ghosts of handbags past. For a business predicated on moving people efficiently forward to new ideas and new products, fashion seems content to do little more than play the hits right now. Meanwhile, shoppers at all price levels are in thrall to a years-long retro revival, mining resale platforms and thrift stores for things more unique or whimsical than what’s newly available. Designer bags have been part of that trend, particularly those from the It Bag era of the mid-2000s, when Chloé’s Paddington and Silverado bags inspired long waitlists and the Fendi Baguette bag and Hermès Birkin both got their own story lines on Sex and the City. Many of that period’s designs were genuinely interesting attempts to rethink the category’s aesthetic conventions—in other words, precisely the kinds of designs that big brands now generally decline to create, mortgaging their long-term relevance in a bid for short-term financial returns.

You can tell that this phenomenon is more than just an era-specific trend, because growing interest in older bags extends far beyond that time to similarly distinctive pieces from much of the past 20 years, including bags such as the Proenza Schouler PS1 and PS11, which hit their peak popularity in the mid-2010s—much too recently to be retro. Most of these styles are abundantly available on resale websites for a couple hundred bucks, a far cry from the thousands of dollars that the same designers charge for new pieces.

As shoppers have made older bags popular, brands have looked at this phenomenon and learned the wrong lessons. In the past few years, they’ve reissued many of these old designs in an attempt to capture existing nostalgia, but most of the pieces, which were never affordable to begin with, are now far more expensive. And even if the reissued bags help keep sales up for another quarter or two, they’re not a solution for malaise among buyers, who seem to be growing tired of both gimmicky logo-mania and the same old timeless, neutral classics. More than anything, they might be sick of the relentless pressure to keep buying, and to spend ever more money to do little beyond prove that they still can. For fashion customers, there’s something to be gained from the industry’s creative stalemate, even if it’s just the realization that the things you actually want to wear or carry right now might already be in your closet.


Amanda Mull is a staff writer at The Atlantic.
Thanks for this, very interesting article.

"Sales of designer bags in “fair” condition, which can have scuffed corners or other highly visible markers of use, nearly doubled in 2022." I think this is also in part because of economics. The cost of living has risen so sharply post-covid that some people may be settling for less than perfect bags because of price. Although even those have gone up noticeably. (I just saw an older Stam listed for $1500 in the wake of MJ bring the style back).
 
I love this observation of hers: "...we now have a fire hose of inescapably common, exorbitantly priced handbags that aren’t particularly singular or compelling. There is an unresolvable tension between being told that the thing you’re buying is expensive because it is rare and special and will last a lifetime, and seeing that thing become near-instantly ubiquitous among celebrities, Instagram influencers, and half the girlies at brunch, just to get ditched wholesale a few months later for something newer and shinier, if only slightly different. This tension has always existed, but social media and online shopping have accelerated the trend cycle so much that one of the industry’s best sleights of hand no longer feels quite so magical. At this point, showing people that it still works on you might even feel a little embarrassing."

"Fire hose of inescapably common, exorbitantly priced handbags that aren't particularly singular or compelling." Yeah, that's what we have.

Thank you for posting this great article.
 
Edit thanks admin for moving! Sorry I didn’t see the thread before.

I saw an article in the Atlantic today by Amanda Mull entitled Something odd is happening with handbags today. Some thoughts expressed in the article aren’t entirely new - eg discussion about how old bags are once again trending.

But what was interesting and refreshing is the writer’s discussion of the tension between brand and clients today as a result of 1) price increases and 2) over saturation in the hand bag market place.

Regarding the latter issue she said:

“we now have a fire hose of inescapably common, exorbitantly priced handbags that aren't particularly singular or compelling. There is an unresolvable tension between being told that the thing you're buying is expensive because it is rare and special and will last a lifetime, and seeing that thing become near-instantly ubiquitous among celebrities, Instagram influencers, and half the girlies at brunch, just to get ditched wholesale a few months later for something newer and shinier, if only slightly different. . . .”

Anyone else have thoughts on the current state of luxury? Has it become boring? Ubiquitous? Has it changed your shopping habits?


I used to look forward to new releases but these days whatever is churned out looks tired and repetitive. Moreover, in both social media and in real life these supposedly “rare and special” pieces are everywhere and this includes Hermes and Chanel bags. Vintage Alhambra bracelets and cartier bangles also ubiquitous.

Just look at Dior. How many times can you change colors and designs and materials of the lady Dior? You see it in sequins, shearling, leather, canvas in different prints and colors. Sorry to say but boring. Same with Chanel though I do think there has been more creativity here than other luxury houses. But think about it - every season the Chanel 19 or mini bags churned out in different colors.

But I suppose what can one expect when some of these brands are under an overarching brands where the number one goal is revenue. While they tell us luxury is special and unique and exclusive, it really isn’t is it when they are churning out mass produced items and spending billions on advertising to appeal to the masses.

I stopped following most sa accounts on photo circle and iPhotos. I got tired of seeing the same old same old. And everything is just so much more expensive than it was even three years ago. My eyes glaze over when I see many designs whether bags, shoes or jewelry. I appreciate what I have but I think luxury is in a rut and have little interest in buying luxury these days. What actually peaks my interest is seeing an exclusive release or collab with something as mundane as long champ. I don’t care if I own something that appeals to the masses or is mass produced as long as I’m not spending a small fortune.:lol:
 
Last edited:
I saw an article in the Atlantic today by Amanda Mull entitled Something odd is happening with handbags today. Some thoughts expressed in the article aren’t entirely new - eg discussion about how old bags are once again trending.

But what was interesting and refreshing is the writer’s discussion of the tension between brand and clients today as a result of 1) price increases and 2) over saturation in the hand bag market place.

Regarding the latter issue she said:

“we now have a fire hose of inescapably common, exorbitantly priced handbags that aren't particularly singular or compelling. There is an unresolvable tension between being told that the thing you're buying is expensive because it is rare and special and will last a lifetime, and seeing that thing become near-instantly ubiquitous among celebrities, Instagram influencers, and half the girlies at brunch, just to get ditched wholesale a few months later for something newer and shinier, if only slightly different. . . .”

Anyone else have thoughts on the current state of luxury? Has it become boring? Ubiquitous? Has it changed your shopping habits?

I used to look forward to new releases but these days whatever is churned out looks tired and repetitive. Moreover, in both social media and in real life these supposedly “rare and special” pieces are everywhere and this includes Hermes and Chanel bags. Vintage Alhambra bracelets and cartier bangles also ubiquitous.

Just look at Dior. How many times can you change colors and designs and materials of the lady Dior? You see it in sequins, shearling, leather, canvas in different prints and colors. Sorry to say but boring. Same with Chanel though I do think there has been more creativity here than other luxury houses. But think about it - every season the Chanel 19 or mini bags churned out in different colors.

But I suppose what can one expect when some of these brands are under an overarching brands where the number one goal is revenue. While they tell us luxury is special and unique and exclusive, it really isn’t is it when they are churning out mass produced items and spending billions on advertising to appeal to the masses.

I stopped following most sa accounts on photo circle and iPhotos. I got tired of seeing the same old same old. And everything is just so much more expensive than it was even three years ago. My eyes glaze over when I see many designs whether bags, shoes or jewelry. I appreciate what I have but I think luxury is in a rut and have little interest in buying luxury these days. What actually peaks my interest is seeing an exclusive release or collab with something as mundane as long champ. I don’t care if I own something that appeals to the masses or is mass produced as long as I’m not spending a small fortune.:lol:
Yes, I loved Amanda's piece, and it resonated with me - we've now reached the point, IMO, where there are too many choices, too much of the time, for everybody. It's like the cereal aisle in the grocery store. I'm just about ... done with it. I've got 8 bags in a couple different styles and you know what, I think they (heck, I KNOW) they'll last me a lifetime.
 
Anyone else have thoughts on the current state of luxury? Has it become boring? Ubiquitous? Has it changed your shopping habits?
I’m sure @Christofle will have great insights on this topic, so I hope he sees my tag :biggrin:

I get bored of current collection, so I mix in my own older items, deadstock vintage, and custom or MtM

The latter two are sometimes but not always less expensive, but the combinations can be a fun new look.

DH shops more custom or MTM from everything from leather goods; shoes; shirts; suits, and I tend to order custom or MtM items from tailors or artisans that DH has tried first. I do draw the line at glasses from Maison Bonnet. He doesn’t like carrying or wearing the same thing as many others on the street.

I shop less custom or MtM and more mid century vintage

ETA: I have turnEd to items for the home when I’m tired of fashion. Since OP’s post was moved to the Amanda MI’ll article thread, I think my response to her query as to how luxury shopping habits have changed (I buy other categories, like furniture) is better suited to this thread. So I’ve reposted here: https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/designer-and-other-furniture.1036331/page-27, post 413 :biggrin:

ETA: while I’m bored with chanel handbags, Chanel‘s bathroom provided some great inspiration re a toilet paper holder :smile:
3EC5AE36-59F2-44CE-B52A-4AB7E210FEB2.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I’m sure @Christofle will have great insights on this topic, so I hope he sees my tag :biggrin:

I get bored of current collection, so I mix in my own older items, deadstock vintage, and custom or MtM

The latter two are sometimes but not always less expensive, but the combinations can be a fun new look.

DH shops more custom or MTM from everything from leather goods; shoes; shirts; suits, and I tend to order custom or MtM items from tailors or artisans that DH has tried first. I do draw the line at glasses from Maison Bonnet. He doesn’t like carrying or wearing the same thing as many others on the street.

I shop less custom or MtM and more mid century vintage
Thanks for the tag! I fully agree about what’s happening in the design world with regards to what Amanda pointed out in her article. But it’s not just fashion that has suffered but I think design in general. You can see it in the car world where models and brands are producing cars that seem to be more similar with each passing year.

There seems to be less acceptance for artistic liberties and a greater need to chase commercial success. If x brand has a successful bag then suddenly every big brand is offering one too. In an industry that used to be chasing novelty now it seems to be chasing safe & large profit margins for corporations and investors.

However while the large fashion brands appear to have stagnated there appears to have been an explosion of offerings from smaller studios who now offer MTM/Bespoke with higher quality materials, craftsmanship and design.

Therefore it’s not all bad! For those that seek craftsmanship and novelty; it is still there with more options than ever just not from the traditional sources.
 
I think yes and no.

Personally, the more I have the less interested I get (and the more picky I become). So, yea, it feels a little oversaturated to me at the moment. I do miss the past when collections were more straightforward with 2 collections a year (SS, FW). I can't keep track of Chanel's many seasonal collections, and over the years other brands now additionally have a resort/summer only collection, or special collaboration collections with other brands, artists, etc. and I don't really care too much about them tbh. (Still interested in seeing what they do but not crazy about it and little to no interest in buying.)

As for running out of ideas:
Humans, we, are creatures of habit. For the most part, we like a routine and as we age and settle into our tastes and personal preferences, we know what we like and generally go for the same things.
Companies and brands know this as well, and stats and sales do not lie :biggrin:. They know what sells well in the long run, and it's going to be mostly those "boring" "same-same" designs. Maybe updated/modernized to fit with the times, but pretty much the same.
Fashion is also cyclical, there are always throwbacks to previous generations, a look into the archives and bringing them back with an update or a twist.

I can see for longstanding handbag lovers and those who have a deeper and more thorough understanding of the luxury houses (basically many on TPF haha), it can get boring and feel like there's nothing new, innovative, or exciting.
It reminds me of Miranda in the Devil Wears Prada when she has a meeting with her team, and as they give her ideas, she shoots them down, reminding them that either these things have been done recently "no. we did that 2 years ago" or that they were boring "florals for spring? ground breaking :P".

However, I do feel that a throwback to Y2K was a little early, being a millennial, I still very clearly remember 2000s and being in my 30s, I'm not that old lol. Like, it's nostalgic I suppose, but I don't know if that's in a good way. :lol:

Technology has also changed the game on how much we "see". It can definitely look and feel like a lot. And I'm sure there are more people buying luxury now than in the past. But the caveat would be, of those photos, videos, unboxings, etc. What is real and what is fake? What is truly owned? Actually bought vs given? Hard to say!

Just kind of rambling here and there though. Interesting points and I hope to see more input and insight from others!
 
Yes, handbags and luxury in general has lost it novelty for me. I am now over stimulated of so much stuff being offered out in the market. Many things look uninteresting and don’t have the spark of novelty of a luxury good.
It's just not feeling 'special' anymore to me and quite frankly it's overwhelming with a new launch every minute. And then the price increases don't help matters. Oh and the quality. I find I'm expending too much mental energy on this stuff - I'm probably going to stay off YouTube for a while. The constant unboxings are making me ill. I know we've talked about this before but I'm like, "what the hell do you do for a living, buying 20k worth of handbags in a week?
 
It's just not feeling 'special' anymore to me and quite frankly it's overwhelming with a new launch every minute. And then the price increases don't help matters. Oh and the quality. I find I'm expending too much mental energy on this stuff - I'm probably going to stay off YouTube for a while. The constant unboxings are making me ill. I know we've talked about this before but I'm like, "what the hell do you do for a living, buying 20k worth of handbags in a week?
Price increases with no changes to products have really deter me from luxury as well.