TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
But you have to admit that there is a touch of the surreally comedic to the exchange which only adds to the intrigue and caché that is Hermès :
"I'm afraid I can't discuss that at this time. We'd have to check with Paris at some point"
"Okay . . . how do we get to the step where you check with Paris?"
"I'm not able to discuss that at this time."
"Okay, is there someone else we can talk to about custom orders?"
"That would be me. I'm the corporate representative in the store. If someone wants to do a custom order, all the questions come to me."
"So, can you help us? I would like to do this order today."
"It all depends."
The next line in my fantasy version of this story would have been, "If I tell you, then I'm afraid I'd have to kill you."
![]()
BEFORE THE LAW stands a doorkeeper on guard. To this doorkeeper there comes a man from the country and prays for admittance to the Law. But the doorkeeper says that he cannot grant admittance at the moment. The man thinks it over and then asks if he will be allowed in later. "It is possible," says the doorkeeper, "but not at the moment."
But you have to admit that there is a touch of the surreally comedic to the exchange which only adds to the intrigue and caché that is Hermès :
"I'm afraid I can't discuss that at this time. We'd have to check with Paris at some point"
"Okay . . . how do we get to the step where you check with Paris?"
"I'm not able to discuss that at this time."
"Okay, is there someone else we can talk to about custom orders?"
"That would be me. I'm the corporate representative in the store. If someone wants to do a custom order, all the questions come to me."
"So, can you help us? I would like to do this order today."
"It all depends."
The next line in my fantasy version of this story would have been, "If I tell you, then I'm afraid I'd have to kill you."
![]()
I thought Hermes owned John Lobb. I haven't purchased anything from John Lobb, and am wondering if one runs into the same difficulties with their SAs that one sometimes encounters with Hermes' SAs?
omg I missed the joke on "Did you tell the salespeople who you are?"!
they are making fun of the OP at that thread! it seems like he's a "star" over there.
:lolots::lolots:
that's it, I'm making an account. LOL
![]()
The next line in my fantasy version of this story would have been, "If I tell you, then I'm afraid I'd have to kill you."
![]()
Maverick to Charlie:" I can tell you but then I have to kill you."It's like Franz Kafka's story, 'Before the Law ':
![]()
This thread is just too good, I could not resist! If you would've told me yesterday that I'd be making an account on a forum where women talk about purses, I would've slapped you!
Where to start where to start...my mouth is salivating...
I guess this could have been trolled some more for the lulz, but at some point you have to stop the madness.
1. Clearly, none of you understand forum humor over there. I cannot believe you actually thought the person posting "did you tell them who you were" posted that with a straight face. But since you thought it was serious, I will add some fuel to the fire by playing devils advocate. There was a good chance Old foo actually was an important person, as you see, in the real world, men acquire the means to purchase expensive things by gaining power and money through business dealings, as opposed to marrying someone with it. So yes, they should have cared who he was or could have been. I guess they are more-so concerned with not offending some celebrity or wife-of-someone-important.
2. I love how some of you talk about some sort of secret Hermes handshakes (No I did not take that literally). There is virtually nothing exclusive about any of the luxury brands you drool over, they exist to fleece people trying to purchase status. Walking into Dunkin Donuts and walking into Hermes is fundamentally the same thing. They have an unlimited supply of goods, and they should offer the base service possible.
3. The craftsmanship and limited availability some of you talk about is a figment of your imagination. I've been in the factories of every major luxury brand (House? LOL), and it's the same thing now: Immigrants from northen africa and eastern europe working for near minimum wage. Only the tiny custom order workshops actually employ French people, not that they're any better at what they do than anyone else. As far as availability, 10,000 skins of wet blue cow (waits for, "my bag isn't blue!") are only a phonecall away for me or anyone else who know the brokers number, and getting them processed is a piece of cake with every tannery in France working way below capacity because their tanning methods can and are replicated in the "third world", ie Spain (ha) or India and come out costing 60% less.
If I had to put a number to it, I would sau 0.001% of Hermes items are hand sewn, so there is no shortage of labor that can operate a sewing machine, and hand sewing is so easy I'm sure any of your mothers could do it, all you need is thread/bristle and an awl.
4. John Lobb had two branches along with a RTW line. Hermes bought the Paris branch and the RTW line. Lobb still gets royalties. Paris/Hermes owned DOES make bespoke shoes, the Lobb London is not the only one.
5. I love what are listed as "luxury brands". LV makes plastic coated canvas bags sewn by immigrants, what is luxurious about that? I guess you wanted to show how much you know about "luxury brands" by mentioning "breitling". For those who know even the bare minimum about watches and the watch industry, breitling is regarded as one of the worst "swiss" brands, using chinese parts in their ETA movements. Real "luxury" watch brands do the entire engineering of the movement themselves. I did not expect women to know much about watches however, as the only watches sold to them for the most part (99%) are cheap quartz garbage. All the Hermes, LV, etc watches fit the bill here.
6. How could brands made by uneducated minimum wage labor be luxurious? How did this perception start? Some smart businessMEN, like the one who founded this website, had no interest in these things but knew by dumping millions on marketing they could convince the "Jones'" that they need their goods to display their new "status". They were right.
7. The car analogy is inept. There is an enormous amount of original engineering innovation in makers like bmw, benz, etc that justifies their prices somewhat. They spend billions on r&d and need to recoup that amount. "Luxury brands" have nothing to r&d, except marketing, and that's what they spend money on. A better analogy would be spending $100,000 on a Daewoo because they created faux exclusivity by limiting output. Ie, you're a mental midget if you buy into that. There is no fundamental difference between a $50 dollar and $5000 purse.
8. So what is luxury? Once upon a time, my family had 2 seamstresses and a shoemaker as part of their staff. This is not the case anymore, but the places where I purchase my shoes, suits, shirts, etc make my things only by "special order" (what is this, a department store?), and do not require any kind of idiotic "secret handshake". They treat people coming in for their first suit or their 50th with the same level of attention and respect. In the event that they don't, there are a dozen more places that will, and knowing that, they do not make that mistake. With my tailor having my pattern, and shoemakers having my mold, etc. I can call them up and place an order for a pair of shoes or a belt in any color of the rainbow. Even if I did not have a relationship with them, they would oblige all the same.