Reading about the current spend levels gives me agita (for others). While I'm not naive enough to think spend is irrelevant, it's scary to read how much people are spending in the hopes of procuring a bag (and then not being offered anything).
Caveat: I'm a long time H client (~20 years) so I've seen the gradual changes over the years, and am likely not immune to these changes either.
However, I come from the camp where I feel pure spend isn't the only defining factor, it's just one metric amongst many, such as: your repertoire with your SA, SM, the store as a whole, whether the store sees potential in you as a long time client or will you disappear after getting what you want, and do you come across as a cash cow (as in someone who clearly just wants a bag and will buy everything in sight).
I truly believe that H is still looking for that genuine client who appreciates the brand and will buy at their leisure, but with the inventory issues of the last 2 years, AND the influx of new clients, I get how $$ has become one of the defining factors.
What newer clients need to learn is that you can never perfectly plot out your shopping experience, and you're never fully in control of it. Datapoint: I received a QB earlier in the year, and ended up spending 4:1 in the following months. It was on items that are rarer and show up infrequently at my home store. Would I like another bag? Sure. Do I feel entitled to one just because I've spent that amount? Absolutely not.