There is a lot of noise on the internet (youtube/tiktok,etc.) that buying in the shoe category is the least helpful for building prespend toward a QB. The thing is, I really enjoy H shoes. Of all of the designer shoes I've collected, I find that they hold up the best and are the most versatile. Will it really hurt my chances toward a QB or will I have to spend a lot more in general if the vast majority (say 55%+) of my spend is in shoes with belts as my next most weighted category?
I know that the general advice is to diversify your spending across metiers, but I don't much care for the FJ (prefer Cartier tbh) and while I like some of the RTW I'm often finding the pieces I actually want for 50% or less on TRR.
I buy a lot of shoes (for me) and belts (for me and as gifts). Now I buy more exotic shoes, but always the same models.
It seems they do prefer that customers buy in other categories, as jewelry, RTW, MTM, home and furniture. Many SAs have stated that to different people, not only in the U.S.
I know that one measure of customer engagement on their websites (across regions) is if a person bought on three or more categories in the past 36 months. If you only buy a bag online (for example) in that period, it will show you bought “leather” and there will be a note - “customer bought leather in the past 36 months.”
If you bought a bag and items in two other categories, it will show “customer bought on 3 or more categories, including leather.”
There are people that are scarf collectors and get QB offers, and they buy mostly silk scarves.
H tends not to be very innovative on their shoes; I have dozens of Oasis, Orans, Oz etc., so sometimes I feel I am running out of shoes to buy.
In any event I don’t think you should worry.