Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I kindly request that all members participating in the MM and Harry thread dial back the vile rhetoric.

I am not opposed to discussing public personas on TPF, including the constant torrent of news surrounding the couple from this thread. But I find it troubling when their looks are being nitpicked apart to a degree that is just not appropriate.

This thread has drawn criticism over the years, and I discussed it at great length with Megs and the mods. I am not looking to close it down, but the vitriol needs to be dialed back.

My personal feelings about hate threads aside, this ultra-negative vibe is something better suited for other forums, Reddit, or elsewhere. I am holding our community to higher standards.

Thanks for reading.
 
I honestly have my doubts if Andrew is truly guilty of what he's accused of or was just the easy target, BUT him not asking his flavour of the day's age is entirely his fault. As we say in Germany, "Dummheit schützt vor Strafe nicht" (stupidity doesn't save you from punishment).
Andrew’s fault may be much the same as H’s fault. Neither knows when to shut up.
I wanted to say they don’t engage their brains before opening their mouth, but that presumes they have one…
The PRINCIPLE OF WAY TOO MUCH INFORMATION is unknown to these men, they think that saying their truth will cause a brain change in everyone. There are people who will never see their side. Nor do the gentlemen see the long term effects of their confessions …hmmm maybe this will annoy/embarrass the kids/grandkids
 
I don’t think so. Rupert specifically says it was a woman.

"By the way. I know who the woman he lost his virginity to is. And it wasn't behind a pub. And it wasn't in this country," Everett said "with a twinkle in his eye," The Telegraphreported Thursday. "I'm just putting it out there that I know."

Actually I was curious about that too so I went back to find the article and he does say it was a woman.
The 'inglorious' event, mystery solved? :hrmm: Anyway, these guys are funny.


Prince Harry's mystery "older woman" comes forward after book details | Royal | Today Show Australia

 



Just voted and the results show 96% want their titles taken away. Let's hope it happens but KCIII may possibly be involved in the final say? I don't know, but do I know that the Smarkles (Smug Harkles) do not, in any way, deserve the Royal titles they have. Their behaviour is abhorrent; all the lies, amongst everything else, causing the rest of us biliousness and fury. They're in the news but they're not interesting; it's just that we cannot believe our eyes and ears with what they do and say. Under a snake's belly used to be the lowest that one could go, but they've limboed beneath that. Truly singularly unappealing and unattractive individuals.
 
Laying it on thick that she is an actress, so arts-related? And her Judas husband can sing (both tunelessly and like a canary). If Getty does not know about her and she does her poor victim/ brave feminist act, she might charm $$$$ out of him.

That reminds me: just after they "fled" to North America, Sparry was seen having lunch with a wealthy older woman who ran a foundation. Did he ever sleaze money out of her?

She should thank her plastic surgeon and dental aesthetician.
and she should thank her father for paying for all of that...its despicable the way she has markled him
 
Top