Nordstrom Return Policy Thread!!

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Question after reading this thread. I am mainly curious to your thoughts after reading all the comments

Do you think there is a fine line between people that abuse the policy mentioned in some stories in this thread and the loyal customers that mainly buy from Nordstrom knowing that if an item does not work for them that they can bring it back used or not? I think for the latter it is what keeps loyal customers coming back and mainly buying from Nordstrom. Thoughts?

To be clear I mean mainly people that know that if they buy a pair of shoes that causes them pain after wearing them that they can return them or the person that buys a sweater, wears it and notices it sheds all over their black pants. Situations like that.

Thanks and I do not mean to stir up anything I am just super curious to your thoughts.

I am just curious after reading all these comments.

I do think this is an interesting discussion, but I do agree with Lulilu.

I am absolutely guilty of returning things that I order online, but I do in a reasonable amount of time. I try it on, it fits, or it doesn't. If it doesn't. it's back to the store within a few days. Someone wrote about having a bag under their bed for a few years. I can't believe anyone would have the nerve to attempt a return like that. Why should the store be stuck with your item that is 3 years out of style? You made a decision to buy it and keep it. If that decision proved wrong, you take responsibility for your choice.

If something is defective, it should indeed go back to a store. But uncomfortable and defective are two very different things. The idea that someone wears something and returns it because it is uncomfortable is completely appalling to me. I would be mortified to attempt it. What is the store supposed to do with used shoes? It's not their fault, not the manufacturers' fault, why should they take a loss?

We have threads where people lament the quality of the Anniversary Sale and the Rack, or complain about employees, but then we have threads where people say they found a pair of 2 year jeans with the tags on - they don't fit now, so they will return them. People want to figure out how to beat the system, but also expect the stores to be to operate with the same quality of merchandise and staff as they always have.
 
Last edited:
The judgement and pearl clutching is ridiculous. If people don't like the return policy, especially store employees, work from the inside to influence (fair) change in said policy. But the bold letters in these responses reek of looking down on a person with disgust, and that just ain't cool. Make your point without all that. It drives people away. I'm appalled for the person with the Prada bag and the shoes for all of the nasty tones in the replies! How anyone could expect to enlighten either poster on the (perceived) ills of their actions and expectations is beyond me. If I were either of them all of the rude replies would have fallen on deaf ears. I mean really, Nordstrom has a policy. It's theirs. It's public. They honor it. If it's not favored then work to change it. Until it changes, it should be honored. As far as losses, stores have contingencies to mitigate loss yearly. And let's not pretend that Nordstrom doesn't refurbish plenty of merchandise and re-sell it...often. Also, I could give a rats behind about stuff being worn or receipts not matching, being treated like crap is absolutely awful and should be intolerable by any customer. I would not have stood for it with the person processing the return of the shoes. Point. Blank. Period. Go to the break room and trash talk about me with your co-worker, I could couldn't care any less, but you will not scold/preach/ridicule/belittle me at all. I will rip you a nice-nasty new one! I have a pair of Christian Louboutin flats that I have NEVER put a toe in. Brand new. Still wrapped and boxed. Receipt inside the box. Proof of purchase sticker still affixed. From time to time I think about returning them. I bought them 3 years ago. (For the record I have about 5/6 pair of CL flats and these just haven't made it into my rotation.) If I take the plung and decide to return them, please believe my expectation is that I am received without fanfare. I expect to be treated in the same manner as when I made the purchase. Please don't reply and tell me that my story differs from the other members in that her shoes were worn, for I again direct you to the company's policy. And I further implore you to work to change said policy if you don't like it - not berate someone who used it.

Allow me to share one additional story that just came to mind. This past July, I purchased a pair of leather Ugg boots that are exclusive to Nordstrom. I shop at Nordstrom a lot. I do so on purpose. And I do so as a result of being heavily influenced by and in favor of their return policy. To my point, I have not made a purchase from Saks or NM in many, many years (my plan is to never give Saks another cent of my money, but I digress). You see, because I almost and practically exclusively shop at Nordstrom, especially for designer purchases, you can bet your bottom dollar that I feel as though I can/should/will take the store up on ITS LIBERAL return policy. The company almost exclusively and practically get my dollars. Any-who, back to the Ugg boot. My personal shopper hunted the last pair down for me and found them at another store. I had to buy them without prior knowledge about fit (even though I read reviews). Once the arrived I tried one boot on one boot. Looking back, I think because I "had" to have them I decided to keep them. Fast forward to October, I put them on one morning and didn't have an easy time getting them on. I drove directly to work uncomfortable the entire time. As soon as I got to my office and snatched the boots off and NEVER put them on again. Guess what I'm doing tomorrow (as long as their isn't a blizzard). I am returning the boots. Say what you will. Say what you want. The boots are not in brand new condition, but that are in excellent condition. They can be resold. Now in contrast, I have some knit Ugg boots that I purchased lord knows how long ago. They aren't even in condition to be donated to goodwill. I wouldn't dream of taking them back. I had some brown suede Ugg boots that I stupidly washed after reading reviews of other who claimed to washed theirs. They shrunk. Again, those I accepted as a loss (and did donate those to the goodwill...I hope someone bought them for their daughter, lol, the only issue was they were too small). My point in sharing those two anecdotes is to demonstrate my OWN philosophy on shopping at Nordstrom and enacting their return policy. I'm not looking for approval or agreement with MY philosophy. I believe, however people differ, the company and its representatives, should follow the guidelines that are in place free from judgment until the policy changes. If the representatives can't bear fulfilling the policy with a smile and hello (outwardly) they should probably seek a new employer or work in another capacity behind the scenes.

Let me be clear, feel how you feel. We're all entitled. But my goodness, if people can't come to these subforums and share experiences or seek guidance without the judgment, then where can they go...AND LEARN. What many may not realize is often times the judgement and tone and nasty/vile language turns people off to the point where a teachable moment is missed. Perhaps, your perspective (not necessarily right because it's the store policy...I'm going to beat that like it's a dead horse) could have cause both members to reflect and possibly change their perspectives and practices. I know if it were me, I would have replied, and it wouldn't have been "right", with, 'I couldn't care less so kick rocks'!

In summary, share your ideas and perspectives without looking down on members with utter outrage and sheer disgust because you choose to not utilize Nordstrom's return policy they way that it is written and set forth for all customers who make purchases.
 
You should be able to determine if something doesn't fit or is not comfortable relatively close to the purchase date. To wait 6 months or a year is too much IMO and seems like gaming the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qteepiec
The judgement and pearl clutching is ridiculous. If people don't like the return policy, especially store employees, work from the inside to influence (fair) change in said policy. But the bold letters in these responses reek of looking down on a person with disgust, and that just ain't cool. Make your point without all that. It drives people away. I'm appalled for the person with the Prada bag and the shoes for all of the nasty tones in the replies! How anyone could expect to enlighten either poster on the (perceived) ills of their actions and expectations is beyond me. If I were either of them all of the rude replies would have fallen on deaf ears. I mean really, Nordstrom has a policy. It's theirs. It's public. They honor it. If it's not favored then work to change it. Until it changes, it should be honored. As far as losses, stores have contingencies to mitigate loss yearly. And let's not pretend that Nordstrom doesn't refurbish plenty of merchandise and re-sell it...often. Also, I could give a rats behind about stuff being worn or receipts not matching, being treated like crap is absolutely awful and should be intolerable by any customer. I would not have stood for it with the person processing the return of the shoes. Point. Blank. Period. Go to the break room and trash talk about me with your co-worker, I could couldn't care any less, but you will not scold/preach/ridicule/belittle me at all. I will rip you a nice-nasty new one! I have a pair of Christian Louboutin flats that I have NEVER put a toe in. Brand new. Still wrapped and boxed. Receipt inside the box. Proof of purchase sticker still affixed. From time to time I think about returning them. I bought them 3 years ago. (For the record I have about 5/6 pair of CL flats and these just haven't made it into my rotation.) If I take the plung and decide to return them, please believe my expectation is that I am received without fanfare. I expect to be treated in the same manner as when I made the purchase. Please don't reply and tell me that my story differs from the other members in that her shoes were worn, for I again direct you to the company's policy. And I further implore you to work to change said policy if you don't like it - not berate someone who used it.

Allow me to share one additional story that just came to mind. This past July, I purchased a pair of leather Ugg boots that are exclusive to Nordstrom. I shop at Nordstrom a lot. I do so on purpose. And I do so as a result of being heavily influenced by and in favor of their return policy. To my point, I have not made a purchase from Saks or NM in many, many years (my plan is to never give Saks another cent of my money, but I digress). You see, because I almost and practically exclusively shop at Nordstrom, especially for designer purchases, you can bet your bottom dollar that I feel as though I can/should/will take the store up on ITS LIBERAL return policy. The company almost exclusively and practically get my dollars. Any-who, back to the Ugg boot. My personal shopper hunted the last pair down for me and found them at another store. I had to buy them without prior knowledge about fit (even though I read reviews). Once the arrived I tried one boot on one boot. Looking back, I think because I "had" to have them I decided to keep them. Fast forward to October, I put them on one morning and didn't have an easy time getting them on. I drove directly to work uncomfortable the entire time. As soon as I got to my office and snatched the boots off and NEVER put them on again. Guess what I'm doing tomorrow (as long as their isn't a blizzard). I am returning the boots. Say what you will. Say what you want. The boots are not in brand new condition, but that are in excellent condition. They can be resold. Now in contrast, I have some knit Ugg boots that I purchased lord knows how long ago. They aren't even in condition to be donated to goodwill. I wouldn't dream of taking them back. I had some brown suede Ugg boots that I stupidly washed after reading reviews of other who claimed to washed theirs. They shrunk. Again, those I accepted as a loss (and did donate those to the goodwill...I hope someone bought them for their daughter, lol, the only issue was they were too small). My point in sharing those two anecdotes is to demonstrate my OWN philosophy on shopping at Nordstrom and enacting their return policy. I'm not looking for approval or agreement with MY philosophy. I believe, however people differ, the company and its representatives, should follow the guidelines that are in place free from judgment until the policy changes. If the representatives can't bear fulfilling the policy with a smile and hello (outwardly) they should probably seek a new employer or work in another capacity behind the scenes.

Let me be clear, feel how you feel. We're all entitled. But my goodness, if people can't come to these subforums and share experiences or seek guidance without the judgment, then where can they go...AND LEARN. What many may not realize is often times the judgement and tone and nasty/vile language turns people off to the point where a teachable moment is missed. Perhaps, your perspective (not necessarily right because it's the store policy...I'm going to beat that like it's a dead horse) could have cause both members to reflect and possibly change their perspectives and practices. I know if it were me, I would have replied, and it wouldn't have been "right", with, 'I couldn't care less so kick rocks'!

In summary, share your ideas and perspectives without looking down on members with utter outrage and sheer disgust because you choose to not utilize Nordstrom's return policy they way that it is written and set forth for all customers who make purchases.

All due respect but it sounds like the pot calling kettle black here......you placing judgement on others opinions. We all have one, just move on if you don't like it. For those who are offended by others and have a thin skin then I guess maybe a public forum is not the place for them.
Most of us are raised with values that become ingrained in us, right and wrong, fair and unfair......etc. Neither you or probably anyone else on this forum will change the mind of those who feel that certain returns are wrong.

I do agree that no employee should EVER make a customer feel uncomfortable in front of other employees or customers. I think our agreement ends there, however.

I worked for Nordstrom for many years so have a bit of experience dealing with those crazy-a$$ returns. Some of them would absolutely surprise you. Until you've walked a mile in those shoes (pun intended) please be more gentle with the employees and the stuff they see and have to return. I'm lucky because I was in management and the buck stopped with me. And yes, there were times I absolutely said NO to a return.
 
The judgement and pearl clutching is ridiculous. If people don't like the return policy, especially store employees, work from the inside to influence (fair) change in said policy. But the bold letters in these responses reek of looking down on a person with disgust, and that just ain't cool. Make your point without all that. It drives people away. I'm appalled for the person with the Prada bag and the shoes for all of the nasty tones in the replies! How anyone could expect to enlighten either poster on the (perceived) ills of their actions and expectations is beyond me. If I were either of them all of the rude replies would have fallen on deaf ears. I mean really, Nordstrom has a policy. It's theirs. It's public. They honor it. If it's not favored then work to change it. Until it changes, it should be honored. As far as losses, stores have contingencies to mitigate loss yearly. And let's not pretend that Nordstrom doesn't refurbish plenty of merchandise and re-sell it...often. Also, I could give a rats behind about stuff being worn or receipts not matching, being treated like crap is absolutely awful and should be intolerable by any customer. I would not have stood for it with the person processing the return of the shoes. Point. Blank. Period. Go to the break room and trash talk about me with your co-worker, I could couldn't care any less, but you will not scold/preach/ridicule/belittle me at all. I will rip you a nice-nasty new one! I have a pair of Christian Louboutin flats that I have NEVER put a toe in. Brand new. Still wrapped and boxed. Receipt inside the box. Proof of purchase sticker still affixed. From time to time I think about returning them. I bought them 3 years ago. (For the record I have about 5/6 pair of CL flats and these just haven't made it into my rotation.) If I take the plung and decide to return them, please believe my expectation is that I am received without fanfare. I expect to be treated in the same manner as when I made the purchase. Please don't reply and tell me that my story differs from the other members in that her shoes were worn, for I again direct you to the company's policy. And I further implore you to work to change said policy if you don't like it - not berate someone who used it.

Allow me to share one additional story that just came to mind. This past July, I purchased a pair of leather Ugg boots that are exclusive to Nordstrom. I shop at Nordstrom a lot. I do so on purpose. And I do so as a result of being heavily influenced by and in favor of their return policy. To my point, I have not made a purchase from Saks or NM in many, many years (my plan is to never give Saks another cent of my money, but I digress). You see, because I almost and practically exclusively shop at Nordstrom, especially for designer purchases, you can bet your bottom dollar that I feel as though I can/should/will take the store up on ITS LIBERAL return policy. The company almost exclusively and practically get my dollars. Any-who, back to the Ugg boot. My personal shopper hunted the last pair down for me and found them at another store. I had to buy them without prior knowledge about fit (even though I read reviews). Once the arrived I tried one boot on one boot. Looking back, I think because I "had" to have them I decided to keep them. Fast forward to October, I put them on one morning and didn't have an easy time getting them on. I drove directly to work uncomfortable the entire time. As soon as I got to my office and snatched the boots off and NEVER put them on again. Guess what I'm doing tomorrow (as long as their isn't a blizzard). I am returning the boots. Say what you will. Say what you want. The boots are not in brand new condition, but that are in excellent condition. They can be resold. Now in contrast, I have some knit Ugg boots that I purchased lord knows how long ago. They aren't even in condition to be donated to goodwill. I wouldn't dream of taking them back. I had some brown suede Ugg boots that I stupidly washed after reading reviews of other who claimed to washed theirs. They shrunk. Again, those I accepted as a loss (and did donate those to the goodwill...I hope someone bought them for their daughter, lol, the only issue was they were too small). My point in sharing those two anecdotes is to demonstrate my OWN philosophy on shopping at Nordstrom and enacting their return policy. I'm not looking for approval or agreement with MY philosophy. I believe, however people differ, the company and its representatives, should follow the guidelines that are in place free from judgment until the policy changes. If the representatives can't bear fulfilling the policy with a smile and hello (outwardly) they should probably seek a new employer or work in another capacity behind the scenes.

Let me be clear, feel how you feel. We're all entitled. But my goodness, if people can't come to these subforums and share experiences or seek guidance without the judgment, then where can they go...AND LEARN. What many may not realize is often times the judgement and tone and nasty/vile language turns people off to the point where a teachable moment is missed. Perhaps, your perspective (not necessarily right because it's the store policy...I'm going to beat that like it's a dead horse) could have cause both members to reflect and possibly change their perspectives and practices. I know if it were me, I would have replied, and it wouldn't have been "right", with, 'I couldn't care less so kick rocks'!

In summary, share your ideas and perspectives without looking down on members with utter outrage and sheer disgust because you choose to not utilize Nordstrom's return policy they way that it is written and set forth for all customers who make purchases.

Sorry not sorry. People who post about scamming a system do not deserve to be treated with kid gloves. Others are entitled to tell them exactly what they think. And in no way do I believe that, had these special snowflakes been told gently and sweetly that they are stealing from a business that they will change their ways.
How are customers supposed to work "within the system" to change a store's policy? We are trying to keep the store from changing its policy so as to prohibit reasonable, eithical returns -- as a result of people scamming their system.
I think you are wrong to return worn shoes. I am entitled to my opinion. And I don't wear pearls.
 
Update:

I was able to return the boots with NO PROBLEM. I arrived at the store. It was seasonably crowded so there was a wait. The next available associate who helps me was a little older. I told him I wanted to see if the boots were available. He went to look, then came back and said they were completely sold out. Fine. I asked him to try another Ugg boot. He came back and said they were out of my size. I asked him to see another color. He again said they were out. I told him I wanted to think about weather I would return the boots I had or not since they were out of stock. I sat unattended for a few minutes debating taking them to a cobbler to attempt stretching. While toiling with the decision I watched the same salesman be a little short with another customer. I decided to call my personal shopper, who happened to be off yesterday, to her know that I was returning the boots and she said, "Go for it! If they don't fit quite right then bring them back and I'll have someone get you a size that works better." I let her know what had already happened. She hung up with me and called the store. She text me back to let me know that she had arranged for someone else to help me and told me who to ask for. The new SA searched the system and found one pair of the boots in my size at a different store. She called that store, twice. That store told her the boots could not be located. I was disappointed, but I was even more pissed off that the gentleman didn't do due diligence. I asked the young woman helping me to check to see if the second boot was available in the store in my size in any color. She came back within a few minutes with my size in black (not the original color I wanted but still a pair no less which is more than what the previous person had done. I immediately asked for the department manager. After sharing my encounter with her, and letting her know of my dilemma with the boots I had, she profusely apologized. She even returned to the stockroom again to double check inventory for both boots for me, but to no avail. She came back to me and told me that she would be happy to return the boots I had and order the second pair for me. I reminded her that the boots I had were worn once. Her reply after inspecting the boots, "Had you not told us they were worn we would not have known as there is no signs of wear. But even if there were signs of wear and tear, it is our policy to accept returns that customers are not happy with, and it is every employee's job to make sure you're satisfied with a smile!" It was at that point that I pulled out my phone and asked her to read the recent post in this thread. She said and I quote, "Everyone has a right to their opinions...but don't forget what opinions are likened to!" She winked at me, smiled, and gave me her card. She let me know that if I ever encountered difficulty with a return, regardless of the department, to ask for her immediately.

I'm so freaking ecstatic that I've been blessed and fortunate to have only run into one salesperson with the type of disposition (related to this topic) as some of the members here. It was years ago. He attempted to put me through the third degree and I ripped him a new, then reported him to the store manager. My problem was not that he had a personal issue with my return (the item was not worn or used, it was high end designer and he apparently was perplexed by that and something else). My problem was with him revealing his indignation to me. His personal opinion, while on the clock, should not have superseded his responsibility of carrying out the store policy, as written, as an agent of the company.

I won't take too much time responding to the replies my post garnered. But I will address a few points, in general versus direct quotes so that I don't slip up and call anyone an idiot.

1) My use of the description about pearl clutching was to describe the indignation and how appalled people seemed to be. I love pearls and wear them daily. I added a new necklace to my never-ending want list. Sorry to all the actual pearl wearers out there, ROTFL!

2) Only small minds are unable to conceptualize the possibility of being able to influence another's opinion or stance regarding something as none life threatening as this topic. I mean we are not talking about politics here are we? Of course not. Perhaps others here have honestly functioned with using the store's policy simply because the policy exists. Not because of some ill intentions. And perhaps they, like me, have been encouraged by store representatives to actually use it. Could it possibly be that they never considered the opposite? Of course it could be. But the pleasure for some is to be able to sit high on that horse of theirs and look down on others. You know, exercising the self righteousness they tend to do often or can't do in their actual real lives.

3) Scamming and gaming a system? How so Sway? It's Nordstrom's policy. Gaming and scamming would be to get passed a policy of not being able to return used merchandise at all or not being able to do so after a certain number of days (in many cases 30). Nordstrom has neither policy. So again that's judgment. But whatever...I returned my boots. And I was welcomed to do so six month after purchasing $315 boots that I wore one time. I guess I need to adopt the "kid in the candy store" mentality and start wearing/using stuff right away instead of waiting until I ready (*heads to closet to pull out Chanel clutch and zippy wallet that's been collecting a little dust since 2013).

4) Snowflakes? I didn't necessarily speak for the other posters. I spoke for myself and in response to the outrage that reeked with judgement. No need to be condescending to them. But there's no surprise or expectation that such behavior would be tamed. Self righteousness kinda does that to people.

5) Ethical? [emoji19] Get real! It's amazing that using a store's policy now has ethical standards/principles attached to it. Certainly, I have heard of stories where people have returned stuff to Nordstrom that had be purchased elsewhere. That is stealing. That is abuse of its policy. But when it comes from the store...not hardly. This thread is specifically about Nordstrom, but several stores have similarly lenient policies. Trader Joe's, Sephora and Whole Foods to name a few. The salad dressing I purchased two weeks ago in my refrigerator which smells like rubbing alcohol should just be thrown out? I think not!

6) Just because the policy exists doesn't mean it has to/should be used (in all cases). Just because a thought comes to mind or a feeling surfaces doesn't mean that it needs to/should be shared or posted. Especially when it's mean-spirited and rude. Let me be clear, some, if not much, of the responses were riddled with implications about the poster (now including myself) that had to do with not only with returns, but the individuals. There have been direct and indirect accusations of stuff that far exceeds making legitimate returns. BTW, my advice goes for me too. I'll try start taking it after this post, HA!

7) Again, only small minded people whine, complain, and damn near attempt to virtually bully others with such below the belt judgmental berating, scolding, chastising, name calling posts instead of contacting Nordstrom and saying, "I am distraught by people using the company's return policy the way it was intended to be used! It's unfair to the company as the company takes losses when people utilize the LIBERAL return policy LIBERALLY. But more importantly, continuing to allow customers to employ the policy the company has had in place since its inception simply is not in line with what makes me feel good each day. Never mind that it is the company's policy and has garnered a massive customer based of people who loyally and exclusively shop with the company because of it AND it's excellent red-carpet like customer service. Never mind that, if the policy is changed, I'll have to find something else to deem a cause so I'll have something else to bark about. No, no, I'll worry about and deal with that later. Right now, I want my voice heard and want the policy to be changed so that it's 'ethical' and reasonable for returns. As a matter of fact, make me the return police[emoji61]!"

Welp, that's pretty much it. No attempt to change perceptions from me. Just calling out the BS with the pearl clutching. Oops, there I go again. Well, I'm off to a [emoji458] football party.

Have a great holiday...and happy return season [emoji6][emoji6][emoji6][emoji6]!
 
i just bought a brand new pair of shoes from nordstrom never worn, but found out it didnt fit me. Nordstrom can't seem to find my transaction purchase will they still take it back?
 
Last edited:
i just bought a brand new pair of shoes from nordstrom never worn, but found out it didnt fit me. Nordstrom can't seem to find my transaction purchase will they still take it back?
If you "just" bought them, I'd assume you have a receipt, right? Or if you used a c.c., they can look it up.
If you paid cash and don't have a receipt, how would you prove they came from Nordstrom? Or even prove that you bought them? Or that they didn't come from another store the sells the same brand?

Most stores either only give merchandise credit (at best) or deny returns (at worst) without a receipt.
 
Update:

I was able to return the boots with NO PROBLEM. I arrived at the store. It was seasonably crowded so there was a wait. The next available associate who helps me was a little older. I told him I wanted to see if the boots were available. He went to look, then came back and said they were completely sold out. Fine. I asked him to try another Ugg boot. He came back and said they were out of my size. I asked him to see another color. He again said they were out. I told him I wanted to think about weather I would return the boots I had or not since they were out of stock. I sat unattended for a few minutes debating taking them to a cobbler to attempt stretching. While toiling with the decision I watched the same salesman be a little short with another customer. I decided to call my personal shopper, who happened to be off yesterday, to her know that I was returning the boots and she said, "Go for it! If they don't fit quite right then bring them back and I'll have someone get you a size that works better." I let her know what had already happened. She hung up with me and called the store. She text me back to let me know that she had arranged for someone else to help me and told me who to ask for. The new SA searched the system and found one pair of the boots in my size at a different store. She called that store, twice. That store told her the boots could not be located. I was disappointed, but I was even more pissed off that the gentleman didn't do due diligence. I asked the young woman helping me to check to see if the second boot was available in the store in my size in any color. She came back within a few minutes with my size in black (not the original color I wanted but still a pair no less which is more than what the previous person had done. I immediately asked for the department manager. After sharing my encounter with her, and letting her know of my dilemma with the boots I had, she profusely apologized. She even returned to the stockroom again to double check inventory for both boots for me, but to no avail. She came back to me and told me that she would be happy to return the boots I had and order the second pair for me. I reminded her that the boots I had were worn once. Her reply after inspecting the boots, "Had you not told us they were worn we would not have known as there is no signs of wear. But even if there were signs of wear and tear, it is our policy to accept returns that customers are not happy with, and it is every employee's job to make sure you're satisfied with a smile!" It was at that point that I pulled out my phone and asked her to read the recent post in this thread. She said and I quote, "Everyone has a right to their opinions...but don't forget what opinions are likened to!" She winked at me, smiled, and gave me her card. She let me know that if I ever encountered difficulty with a return, regardless of the department, to ask for her immediately.

I'm so freaking ecstatic that I've been blessed and fortunate to have only run into one salesperson with the type of disposition (related to this topic) as some of the members here. It was years ago. He attempted to put me through the third degree and I ripped him a new, then reported him to the store manager. My problem was not that he had a personal issue with my return (the item was not worn or used, it was high end designer and he apparently was perplexed by that and something else). My problem was with him revealing his indignation to me. His personal opinion, while on the clock, should not have superseded his responsibility of carrying out the store policy, as written, as an agent of the company.

I won't take too much time responding to the replies my post garnered. But I will address a few points, in general versus direct quotes so that I don't slip up and call anyone an idiot.

1) My use of the description about pearl clutching was to describe the indignation and how appalled people seemed to be. I love pearls and wear them daily. I added a new necklace to my never-ending want list. Sorry to all the actual pearl wearers out there, ROTFL!

2) Only small minds are unable to conceptualize the possibility of being able to influence another's opinion or stance regarding something as none life threatening as this topic. I mean we are not talking about politics here are we? Of course not. Perhaps others here have honestly functioned with using the store's policy simply because the policy exists. Not because of some ill intentions. And perhaps they, like me, have been encouraged by store representatives to actually use it. Could it possibly be that they never considered the opposite? Of course it could be. But the pleasure for some is to be able to sit high on that horse of theirs and look down on others. You know, exercising the self righteousness they tend to do often or can't do in their actual real lives.

3) Scamming and gaming a system? How so Sway? It's Nordstrom's policy. Gaming and scamming would be to get passed a policy of not being able to return used merchandise at all or not being able to do so after a certain number of days (in many cases 30). Nordstrom has neither policy. So again that's judgment. But whatever...I returned my boots. And I was welcomed to do so six month after purchasing $315 boots that I wore one time. I guess I need to adopt the "kid in the candy store" mentality and start wearing/using stuff right away instead of waiting until I ready (*heads to closet to pull out Chanel clutch and zippy wallet that's been collecting a little dust since 2013).

4) Snowflakes? I didn't necessarily speak for the other posters. I spoke for myself and in response to the outrage that reeked with judgement. No need to be condescending to them. But there's no surprise or expectation that such behavior would be tamed. Self righteousness kinda does that to people.

5) Ethical? [emoji19] Get real! It's amazing that using a store's policy now has ethical standards/principles attached to it. Certainly, I have heard of stories where people have returned stuff to Nordstrom that had be purchased elsewhere. That is stealing. That is abuse of its policy. But when it comes from the store...not hardly. This thread is specifically about Nordstrom, but several stores have similarly lenient policies. Trader Joe's, Sephora and Whole Foods to name a few. The salad dressing I purchased two weeks ago in my refrigerator which smells like rubbing alcohol should just be thrown out? I think not!

6) Just because the policy exists doesn't mean it has to/should be used (in all cases). Just because a thought comes to mind or a feeling surfaces doesn't mean that it needs to/should be shared or posted. Especially when it's mean-spirited and rude. Let me be clear, some, if not much, of the responses were riddled with implications about the poster (now including myself) that had to do with not only with returns, but the individuals. There have been direct and indirect accusations of stuff that far exceeds making legitimate returns. BTW, my advice goes for me too. I'll try start taking it after this post, HA!

7) Again, only small minded people whine, complain, and damn near attempt to virtually bully others with such below the belt judgmental berating, scolding, chastising, name calling posts instead of contacting Nordstrom and saying, "I am distraught by people using the company's return policy the way it was intended to be used! It's unfair to the company as the company takes losses when people utilize the LIBERAL return policy LIBERALLY. But more importantly, continuing to allow customers to employ the policy the company has had in place since its inception simply is not in line with what makes me feel good each day. Never mind that it is the company's policy and has garnered a massive customer based of people who loyally and exclusively shop with the company because of it AND it's excellent red-carpet like customer service. Never mind that, if the policy is changed, I'll have to find something else to deem a cause so I'll have something else to bark about. No, no, I'll worry about and deal with that later. Right now, I want my voice heard and want the policy to be changed so that it's 'ethical' and reasonable for returns. As a matter of fact, make me the return police[emoji61]!"

Welp, that's pretty much it. No attempt to change perceptions from me. Just calling out the BS with the pearl clutching. Oops, there I go again. Well, I'm off to a [emoji458] football party.


Have a great holiday...and happy return season [emoji6][emoji6][emoji6][emoji6]!


I majored in Retail Marketing and worked as a retail manager after college. I have first hand experienced horror stories including returns with blood, sweat and sun tan lotion on it. Had to quit and change professions after 6 years of customer service hell and treated less than human at times...

My point is that personal ethics should go above entitlement and abuse of return policies. The first store I worked at was founded in San Francisco in the 1960's had a lenient return policy. Unfortunately it also had thousands of theft. It is no longer in business. Will be sad if other shops go out of business and start closing stores too due to loss or revenue..
 
"Wow, thank you mama13drama99 for that saga.......
As long as you got what you want and feel justified in your actions who/what else could possibly matter?
Merry Christmas and many more happy returns to you. (BTW, I happen to own pearls but make sure I only wear them when returning items to Nordstrom)"


Saga? Maybe it's the lawyer inside of me...but you're welcomed nonetheless! I'll remember to use that description when I read one of your many post (that aren't always so short).

You're quite welcome. And thank you! It'll be rare that I say this to you, but you're right I got what I wanted and feel justified (especially since the manager reminded me of what we all know about Nordstrom). I'm happy with the outcome and I STILL find it pleasant that you gave your (sarcastic) approval.

I can't wait to see so many folks doing returns at many stores come December 26th...don't you just love the extended return periods afforded to us during Christmas [emoji319]!?!?

Merry Holidays!
 
Top