I did personally write an email to ask Chanel today. I got the same response as barbie444 got from Chanel, and the additional separate response from Chanel. I highlight and bold the message as following,
[FONT=Tahoma, Verdana]Thank you for taking the time to contact Chanel.
Chanel has always abided by the principle of sourcing raw materials, technology and craftsmanship from wherever they are reputed to be the best in the world (yarn or leather from Italy and France, cashmere from Scotland and watch-making skills in Switzerland), the prêt-a-porter and leather goods being made exclusively in Europe.
Chanel has thus selected Asian suppliers for the manufacture of small accessories or objects that require a skill, a technology or a special manual skill that cannot be found or can no longer be found in Europe. This is why Chanel professional brushes are manufactured in China, birthplace of calligraphy and possessor of a centuries-old reputation for knowledge of hair quality (the best in the world) and hand-assembly.
Whatever the geographical location of our partners, Chanel applies exactly the same selection criteria for quality, excellence and the respect of social rights. What is true for Europe is true for China or Japan. Should you require additional information, please call (800) 550-0005 to speak with a Chanel Customer Service Representative.
Thank you for your continued interest in Chanel.
[/FONT]
Warm Regards,
I have been following this thread for a while and based on the response chanel gave to lovelvburberry don't see where they ever say they are producing handbags in China. They said the leather comes from France or Italy and the leather goods are made exclusively in Europe. Based on this in regards to bags and slg's I can see them maybe getting their hardware such as the chains or closures from China since they don't address those directly. There are so many responses of I can't believe Chanel bags are being made in china or that they are having the majority of parts or assembly coming from there that I am still trying to understand where that conclusion came from?
I have to start with the lines I have put in bold red. I actually did a search for these marvelous makeup brushes, and once again, this is an extremely blurred version of the truth. What are considered the "best" are different for different brushes, but in no case was China brought into the mix. This is the sales pitch, but the facts don't back it up. Also, they kinda fail to mention that these makeup brushes are NOT cruelty free. They make a big deal with the nail polishes of being "3-free" but don't let you know the unpleasantness behind those fur brushes. I'll let you all research this yourselves (but oh how I wish I could un-see what I saw about the furry little squirrels, to say nothing of the minks and other furry critters--synthetic is best from many tests...just sayin'.).
As to the line where they state, Chanel has thus selected Asian suppliers for the manufacture of small accessories or objects that require a skill, a technology or a special manual skill that cannot be found or can no longer be found in Europe., I'm going to suppose, because they didn't state otherwise, that this also includes or could include small items such as are used in small leather goods, small bags, clothing (what is "small" to Chanel I have no idea), costume jewelry, and who knows what all. Gloves to hats, scarves to shoes. If the artisans are no longer available, then all bets are off. If the technology has been outsourced, then there go the items made by this technology. We just saw a bunch of photos of bags made with...yep, technology.
There is too much ambiguity (look at all of the other letters received, and the "jazz ball" responses from the SA's) and not enough transparency. Then there is out and out not being honest. Each person has to decide for themselves which is true and which is an illusion or fantasy.
I wanted to bring up this again since I feel like the response chanel made has been buried in the posts. They responded with:
"Chanel has always abided by the principle of sourcing raw materials, technology and craftsmanship from wherever they are reputed to be the best in the world (yarn or leather from Italy and France, cashmere from Scotland and watch-making skills in Switzerland), the prêt-a-porter and leather goods being made exclusively in Europe. "
Tutu I agree they are not being transparent about a lot of things in terms of the cosmetics, CJ and other items. I wouldn't include slg's in this since their response said leather goods are made exclusively in Europe and even though a slg is small it is still a leather good. If we just focus this discussion on bags which is where the subject line started I think they are being transparent that the leather is from Italy or France and the bags are made in Europe. Would it bother me to know a Turnlock hardware or chain that is on my bag was made in China? No it does not personally bother me. Would it bother me if my bag was mainly assembled in China and had the finishing touches added in Italy so it bears a made in Italy stamp as so many people are alleging? Yes it would. I think that is not the case with *bags* though since they are very clear on that point.