There have been plenty of threads about the return policy at Hermes, but I'd like to throw out this idea to you all... (and please don't flame me!)
After observing the following, I'm beginning to think that Hermes should not allow returns at all:
1. Saw a beautiful Kelly at the boutique, really lovely, then opened it up and saw a long blonde hair inside. Don't tell me the hair managed to get inside the bag while at the boutique.
2. Reveal threads where the "owner" photographs a new bag on the ground outdoors, on a kitchen table (with food!) or next to a pet, asking "should I keep it?"
3. Threads showing a new bag or scarf out on the town and then a few days later, a thread asking "should I return it?"
Fellow H devotees, what do you think?
It would be nice, I think, to know that an item purchased at the boutique did not have a prior life outside the boutique. It's not a germ issue. The question is: Is it fair to the eventual owner to pay retail for what is essentially a used item?
I realize that the fact that Hermes has a limited supply of items promotes tendencies to "buy now, ask questions later." And then there are those people who are serial returners (perhaps a subset of those who suffer from oniomania?).
Since we can't change human behavior, perhaps we need to take drastic policy measures.
Therefore, I vote for "final sale only". Other ideas?
This seems kind of ironic because in the past I've seen people go the H reseller route and pay more than store prices for used bags.
Particularly if something is rare/no-one knows if it'll ever be seen again/won't get it for that price anywhere else etc I think most people are willing to turn a blind eye to determining exactly whether the bag is used or not, if there are no visible marks stating otherwise.
Last edited: