"Birking"
Normally I would say get that popcorn out, but alas i am fasting.
Normally I would say get that popcorn out, but alas i am fasting.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
This has to be the best riposte of the dayAll 5 lawyers also have wives that didn’t get a bag lololo
So it's the tying thing. How goes the American or English saying: the proof is in the pudding?This article goes more into the relevant statutes that they are claiming Hermes is violating: https://www.thefashionlaw.com/hermes-scheme-to-sell-birkins-is-anticompetitive-per-new-lawsuit/
The sloppiness of the filing (which other have pointed out here) is very silly…
Of course everybody is going to watch this as a hawk.Right or wrong, agree or disagree, take it seriously or laugh at it; I am eager to see how this plays out.
If it moves further, this could set a groundbreaking precedent in the world of luxury fashion. It'll be negative for some and positive for others.
There may be some disgruntled former employees willing to talk.... Although Hermès Sales Associates receive no commission on the most valuable andsought-after products sold by their employer, they are instructed by Defendants to use Birkinhandbags as a way to coerce consumers to purchase ancillary products sold by Defendants ....
Yeah right. Good luck proving that one.![]()
It would not be hard to prove, just reading the agonizing threads here and on reddit, shows that it is an absolute known tactic.
Is it why the stock is tanking on the Bourse de Paris?
Anyways, this will be settled as the plaintiffs will just be given their choice of bags for little to no cost.
Agree at the end of the day Hermes will blacklist the plaintiffs with no BIRKING ( their word) in hand..I'm thinking this will just be dropped by the court/judge.
And the plaintiffs are just going to be blacklisted.
In order to uphold their system, they should stick with it. Otherwise one exception will lead to another, and it will just fall apart.
Well recently Chanel won a significant ip case that has potential significant impact on how others can use their marks and with reselling. Legal world was surprised the court went so far. California I think tends to favor consumers? It will be interesting to see how this plays out.I'm thinking this will just be dropped by the court/judge.
And the plaintiffs are just going to be blacklisted.
In order to uphold their system, they should stick with it. Otherwise one exception will lead to another, and it will just fall apart.
Correction:The system at least in the US is quite opaque. For every one of us who contribute our own experience to the prespend thread, there are many who say that they walk in and are offered the bag of their dreams.
Plus, a class action of those coerced to buy beautiful luxury items. Good luck with that
Customers speculating online is hardly court worthy proof...Well recently Chanel won a significant ip case that has potential significant impact on how others can use their marks and with reselling. Legal world was surprised the court went so far. California I think tends to favor consumers? It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
For those thinking about joining the suit they very well may get blacklisted if H wins out. Other brands do some level of what H does but H appears to be the most egregious.
Edit:
And for those who think there is lack of evidence on tying bags to prespend aren’t there multiple threads on this topic just on here? Bkc prespend and maintaining a relationship? What to buy? What ratios? Let’s be real.