The store sending the product gets the money from the sale but it is rung up under the SA's # who requested the charge send. that way the SA gets credit for the sale since they were the one who helped the client, but the sending store gets the money since it is coming out of their inventory, get it?
This makes absolute sense. What about a global search? I reckon it's the SA who did the search that gets the credit and store gets the money. Does it mean that stores will only give up their merchandise in a global search when they are not confident of selling the merchandise themselves?