TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Does anyone have black box from the 80's that can describe their leather?
I just received a BBK 32 sellier in near perfect condition however I am feeling a bit disappointed in the leather. I know...the horror!
It is different than my BB HAC from the 90's. The K has a sheen but feels thinner, has a fine grain and almost feels like there is a coating where the HAC is smooth and glossy. Is this a variation of the leather from different eras?
Not having luck getting a good close up pic, I will try tomorrow in natural light to try to show the difference.
I had a Bbk from the 80's and the leather is thinner and shinier. I can confirm that. I also have box calf from the 60's (the thickest) and the 90's (more matte) and the 80's Bbk feels flimsy compared to the other 2.
I had a Bbk from the 80's and the leather is thinner and shinier. I can confirm that. I also have box calf from the 60's (the thickest) and the 90's (more matte) and the 80's Bbk feels flimsy compared to the other 2.
Hopefully this works. It is from 1982 and as I look closely at the grain, I am starting to wonder whether H embossed this. That may account for the slightly strange feel too. There is no evidence of a coating, seams are clean and there is no over-spray or masking.The texture is smooth and very consistent and running horizontally across the bag. K is left HAC is right
![]()
![]()
Hopefully this works. It is from 1982 and as I look closely at the grain, I am starting to wonder whether H embossed this. That may account for the slightly strange feel too. There is no evidence of a coating, seams are clean and there is no over-spray or masking.The texture is smooth and very consistent and running horizontally across the bag. K is left HAC is right
![]()
![]()
I thought that too, but on the K it is so perfect and consistent across the entire bag, not just at the points where there is stress - such as the flap opening. On my HAC, the wrinkles are all over and look random, they go all different directions. But the K, the grain pattern is perfectly straight horizontally and exactly the same on the front as it is on the back, and all over the entire bag, even the sangles. To make it more interesting, the bottom has the same grain pattern but running vertically. I don't plan on returning it, just as I look more at it, it seems there might have been a change in manufacturing during the 80's.
Just like Keren, I like to hear you out on your opinion on 70s boxcalf. I have 60s,70s, 90s. No 80s. So far I'm really liking the 70s best. 90s is indeed less shiny.
Come to think of it, I have a box calf draw from the 50's, a kelly from the 60's, constance from the 70's, bbk from the 80's and a dalvy from the 90's!
Love Box Calf from the 70's. I have Rouge H Constance and I love the thickness. It's shinier than the 90's but not as shiny as the 80's. I think the box calf from the 50's-70's were the best!!