TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I'm not feeling the love for that bag but the pictures are awful. Without knowing the style, I'd want to see a full creed picture.
You're all correct. The plaque is way too low on the front and the "leather" isn't leather. The plaque has the wrong font and I'm not sure what style it's trying to be.
The seller is really careless in her listings.
Originally Posted by Hyacinth http://static.purseblog.com/tpf2.0/buttons/viewpost.gif "...The major change came in 1994. Production codes and the bags style number now became part of the serial. The first digit was the month code, always a letter of the alphabet and supposed to include only A through M, although a few mistakes were made and a rare N might slip through. (The letter i was avoided because it was too easy to confuse it with the number 1.) The second digit, always a number, was the year the bag was made. Since the new formatting began in 1994, 4 was the first year code used, and single digits would continue to be used for a decade - 0 for the year 2000, 3 for 2003, etc. In 2004 a Zero was added to differentiate between 1994 and 2004 and to match the actual year abbreviation, and that continues to the present with the Zero changing to a One in 2010 so that the code for 2010 is 10. The year code is still the 2 center digits in the first half of the serial number. 
It appears to be okay but as a new seller, she should know that it's better to post the HTML embedded pictures directly into the listing rather than using a stolen stock photo and a link to photobucket. Many buyers don't like to click on links since they worry about viruses, plus, it's easier for buyers to see the pictures when they're right there in the listing.
So I was not informed correctly. And the same person told me this about the serial numbers....
