hello everyone
found this on dr. lasangan(spelling?) site.
"however there is growing evidence nowadays on the deposition of calcium crystals on a prolonged implant (red arrow). The crystals causes nasal bridge irregularity and in one study (Kim et.al) shows evidence to be pre-carcinogenic, suggesting to change the implant every 20 years – similar to breast cohesive gel implants."
http://www.shimmianmanila.com/side-effects-of-silicone-implant
is this true? omg...
also with gortex, i heard that the implant eventually shrinks. as much as 40 %.. is this true as well?
thanks for any input!
That website has some truly horrific photos of silicone implants gone wrong.....but it seems that most are L-shaped implants which are prone to extrusion (not I-silicone ones with tons of cartilage underneath for the tip). When I email-consulted with Dr. Charles Lee and asked him about silicone implants and calcification, he wrote: "The modern silicone implants don't have the same problems such as calcification or translucency as before. Both gortex and silicone are very good, and the material is not as important as the shape of the implant. I will keep in mind your concerns; they both can be very permanent. With silicone, small holes can be placed so there is tissue ingrowth into the silicone implant; and if placed above the covering of the bone, there is not as much resorption of the underlying bone." Hopefully that info is reliable......
BTW I have to say that Shimmian Manila website's bottom ad photo (scroll to the bottom of that page) is pretty bad, if that's their standard of "beauty" or a beautiful nose.....

.....I showed my surgeons this photo as an example of the bulbous nose tip that I definitely wanted to avoid.