Looking at who wrote it, Germain, I'm not surprised. Germain just isn't that good. One of my FB friends commented about i09 the other day, he thinks it's gone downhill quite a bit in the last few months. Sadly, I can't say that I disagree with him.
After reading many reviews I think that the film couldn't win because almost every reviewer had in his head his own version of Tarzan. One didn't like 'this' and 'this' but thought that the film had to have more 'that' and 'that', the other didn't want to see at all 'that' and 'that' but 'this' and 'this' would be for him interestnig. Too little or too much old story, too little or too much origin story, Tarzan isn't 'wild', strong and dominant, he's human or he's like any superhero, not human, Jane is a dimsel or is too modern etc... Everyone had his on scenario and didn't want to see something different for it.
this film seems something of a Rorschach test for some reviewers: what do you think you are watching when you saw this movie?
One of the writers for Forbes has a good article on the marketing, and a review of the film: he liked it.
...Which is a shame, since a more confident investment in marketing that really sold the film accurately could’ve significantly boosted its prospects internationally and at least helped it score on the higher end of domestic estimates. The ad campaign (to the extent there was one) seemed to suggest this is a “dark and gritty” movie full of shadows, death, and somberness, when in fact it’s mostly brightly lit, filled with humor, and features a supporting cast who are really the main characters after all.
While it might never have been a blockbuster hit, there is plenty of reason to think the right marketing and a better release date could’ve positioned
The Legend of Tarzan as a fun popcorn action-adventure for the family to enjoy, a sort of period-setting superhero movie with lots of cool animals. “What if the kid from
The Jungle Book grew up to be a superhero, in a frequently amusing story based on the actual historic resistance to slavery in Africa?” seems to me to be a decent concept around which to build an ad campaign to get the film closer to the $500 million (along with a release date farther away from
Finding Dory) it needs to avoid being a costly misfire.
Regardless of coulda-woulda-shoulda about the marketing and release date, the film’s fate appears set at this point, so let’s turn our attention to the full review. Is
The Legend of Tarzan really as bad as the advance buzz and current slate of critical reviews suggest it is? Read on and find out!
The first few things you should know about
The Legend of Tarzan is that it’s better than you’re hearing, the negative buzz and “troubled production” claims were exaggerated, and I suspect a lot of the negative reactions to the film are at least somewhat influenced by preconceptions caused by those earlier bad reports. Another thing you should know is, the marketing really doesn’t show you what the film is really like and all about, and in fact sort of paints an image that’s sort of the opposite of what it is.
The first few things you should know about
The Legend of Tarzan is that it’s better than you’re hearing, the negative buzz and “troubled production” claims were exaggerated, and I suspect a lot of the negative reactions to the film are at least somewhat influenced by preconceptions caused by those earlier bad reports. Another thing you should know is, the marketing really doesn’t show you what the film is really like and all about, and in fact sort of paints an image that’s sort of the opposite of what it is...
There’s good chemistry between Skarsgård and Jackson, the former making an excellent Tarzan who has spent enough time in the Western world to be conscious of how crazy and extreme his origins are, and yet to still take it all matter-of-factly. Jackson, meanwhile, is aware of the legends but clearly disbelieved the more outrageous claims without realizing the legends don’t even begin to do justice to the truth behind the legend. The film in fact embraces the outrageousness of it all with no attempt to rationalize it, nor any pretense toward apology or embarrassment about the sillier aspects of Tarzan’s origin and legend. The more you embrace it all along with the film, the more you’re going to enjoy it.
Helping in that enjoyment is, as I’ve said, the sense of humor in the story. Much of that humor is derived from George’s interactions with Tarzan, and their pairing is mirrored by the humorous interactions between Jane and Rom. Rom of course is an evil, cruel man, but the film also uses him as a target for jokes that mock his posturing and reputation, allowing Jane to belittle him and make him so self-conscious he repeatedly loses his composure and becomes embarrassed about how easily she sees through his charades. These scenes benefit greatly from Robbie’s and Waltz’s chemistry and individual charms, and while it’s indeed unfortunate that Jane is in “damsel in distress” mode for most of the film, it’s also true that she is clearly no damsel and never seems actually in “distress” as far as danger to her life is concerned. She is portrayed as able to escape relatively easily, and likewise willing and able to fight back and defend herself...
The movie moves from one big action set piece to another, propelled by old-fashioned action-adventure sequences that are the stuff of solid summer popcorn fun. There’s a history lesson, themes about morality and equality, and a few sudden bursts of violence and angst, but none of it ever gets in the way of the first and foremost goal of telling a rousing good story with thrills and laughs. And it looks terrific, with gorgeous footage both real and computer animated.
I saw the film twice, once on a regular screen and once at the Dolby Theatre for its LA premiere. The Dolby Vision dual-4K projection and Atmos sound at the Dolby Theatre is always a treat to experience, but some films especially benefit from Dolby’s laser projection and
The Legend of Tarzan was definitely one of them. The CGI looks far superior in Dolby Vision than it did in standard projection, and the mix of brightness and darkness in the film’s colors and lighting really deserve the superior treatment...
s a Tarzan fan who read my older brothers’ novels and watched the Saturday morning cartoon as a kid, who watched many (but admittedly not all) of the Tarzan pictures over the years, and who loved the 1984
Greystoke origin film, I can say I thoroughly enjoyed
The Legend of Tarzan and found it to be among the more faithful cinematic incarnations of the character. It’s the sort of modern retelling that should’ve worked and should’ve played well with audiences. So it’s unfortunate that all evidence suggests
The Legend of Tarzan won’t generate enough critical praise and box office receipts to at least successfully establish the franchise and win consideration for a sequel...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhug...-and-crazy-summer-popcorn-fun/2/#15cbee697803